From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:14:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49y4f4go57.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444793448-9994-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (Ming Lei's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:30:45 +0800")
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> writes:
> The number of bio->bi_phys_segments is always obtained
> during bio splitting, so it is natural to setup it
> just after bio splitting, then we can avoid to compute
> nr_segment again during merge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index c4e9c37..22293fd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -11,13 +11,16 @@
>
> static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
> struct bio *bio,
> - struct bio_set *bs)
> + struct bio_set *bs,
> + unsigned *nsegs)
> {
> unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
> int alignment;
> sector_t tmp;
> unsigned split_sectors;
>
> + *nsegs = 1;
> +
> /* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
> granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
>
> @@ -51,8 +54,11 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
>
> static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
> struct bio *bio,
> - struct bio_set *bs)
> + struct bio_set *bs,
> + unsigned *nsegs)
> {
> + *nsegs = 1;
> +
> if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -64,7 +70,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
>
> static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
> struct bio *bio,
> - struct bio_set *bs)
> + struct bio_set *bs,
> + unsigned *segs)
> {
> struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
> struct bvec_iter iter;
> @@ -106,22 +113,30 @@ new_segment:
> sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
> }
>
> + *segs = nsegs;
> return NULL;
> split:
> + *segs = nsegs;
> return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
> }
>
> void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio,
> struct bio_set *bs)
> {
> - struct bio *split;
> + struct bio *split, *res;
> + unsigned nsegs;
>
> if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)
> - split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs);
> + split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
> else if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
> - split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs);
> + split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
> else
> - split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split);
> + split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split, &nsegs);
> +
> + /* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
> + res = split ? split : *bio;
> + res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
> + bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
>
> if (split) {
> bio_chain(split, *bio);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-15 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 3:30 [PATCH 0/4] block: some misc changes Ming Lei
2015-10-14 3:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:14 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2015-10-14 3:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: avoid to merge splitted bio Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:15 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-14 3:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:21 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16 0:26 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-14 3:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: mark ctx as pending at batch in flush plug path Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:26 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16 0:24 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49y4f4go57.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®