mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:14:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49y4f4go57.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444793448-9994-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (Ming Lei's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:30:45 +0800")

Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> writes:

> The number of bio->bi_phys_segments is always obtained
> during bio splitting, so it is natural to setup it
> just after bio splitting, then we can avoid to compute
> nr_segment again during merge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

> ---
>  block/blk-merge.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index c4e9c37..22293fd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -11,13 +11,16 @@
>  
>  static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  					 struct bio *bio,
> -					 struct bio_set *bs)
> +					 struct bio_set *bs,
> +					 unsigned *nsegs)
>  {
>  	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
>  	int alignment;
>  	sector_t tmp;
>  	unsigned split_sectors;
>  
> +	*nsegs = 1;
> +
>  	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
>  	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
>  
> @@ -51,8 +54,11 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  
>  static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  					    struct bio *bio,
> -					    struct bio_set *bs)
> +					    struct bio_set *bs,
> +					    unsigned *nsegs)
>  {
> +	*nsegs = 1;
> +
>  	if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> @@ -64,7 +70,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  
>  static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  					 struct bio *bio,
> -					 struct bio_set *bs)
> +					 struct bio_set *bs,
> +					 unsigned *segs)
>  {
>  	struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
>  	struct bvec_iter iter;
> @@ -106,22 +113,30 @@ new_segment:
>  		sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
>  	}
>  
> +	*segs = nsegs;
>  	return NULL;
>  split:
> +	*segs = nsegs;
>  	return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
>  }
>  
>  void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio,
>  		     struct bio_set *bs)
>  {
> -	struct bio *split;
> +	struct bio *split, *res;
> +	unsigned nsegs;
>  
>  	if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)
> -		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs);
> +		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
>  	else if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
> -		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs);
> +		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
>  	else
> -		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split);
> +		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split, &nsegs);
> +
> +	/* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
> +	res = split ? split : *bio;
> +	res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
> +	bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
>  
>  	if (split) {
>  		bio_chain(split, *bio);

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14  3:30 [PATCH 0/4] block: some misc changes Ming Lei
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:14   ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: avoid to merge splitted bio Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:15   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:21   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16  0:26     ` Ming Lei
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: mark ctx as pending at batch in flush plug path Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:26   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16  0:24     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49y4f4go57.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®