Re: [PATCH 0/4] TDX host: kexec() support

["Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>]

On 2/5/2024 12:50 AM, Huang, Kai wrote:

>
>
> On 2/02/2024 2:28 am, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 1/31/24 05:31, Huang, Kai wrote:
>>> Currently kexec() support and TDX host are muturally exclusive in the
>>> Kconfig.  This series adds the TDX host kexec support so that they can
>>> work together and can be enabled at the same time in the Kconfig.
>>>
>>> This follows Dave's suggestion to add the CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_INCOHERENT
>>> attribute to unify both Intel and AMD, instead of having Intel/AMD
>>> specific checks around [1].
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> I've tested on my TDX testig machine but I don't have AMD machine to
>>> test.  I highly appreciate if you or any AMD guy can help to review
>>> and/or test this series to make sure I didn't break anything.
>>
>> Hi Kai,
>>
>> I'm adding Ashish to the thread to take a look at this as he's been 
>> focusing on kexec related things recently.
>>
>
> Thanks Tom.
>
> Hi Ashish,
>
> I appreciate if you can help to review and test the first patch. Thanks!

Hello Kai,

Yes, i am currently working on SNP guest kexec support on top of 
Kirill's TDX guest kexec patches, i will have a look your patch-set and 
test and review it.

Thanks, Ashish