mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, <luto@kernel.org>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <chao.gao@intel.com>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
	<nik.borisov@suse.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/kexec(): Reset TDX private memory on platforms with TDX erratum
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 22:35:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a139b1e0-7737-4c20-842c-64457dba17ca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12a927df-e437-40ff-ba4d-ceca5446c5b1@intel.com>



On 1/02/2024 5:21 am, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/31/24 03:31, Huang, Kai wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>   #include <asm/setup.h>
>>   #include <asm/set_memory.h>
>>   #include <asm/cpu.h>
>> +#include <asm/tdx.h>
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>   /*
>> @@ -298,9 +299,24 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
>>   	void *control_page;
>>   	int save_ftrace_enabled;
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * For platforms with TDX "partial write machine check" erratum,
>> +	 * all TDX private pages need to be converted back to normal
>> +	 * before booting to the new kernel, otherwise the new kernel
>> +	 * may get unexpected machine check.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * But skip this when preserve_context is on.  The second kernel
>> +	 * shouldn't write to the first kernel's memory anyway.  Skipping
>> +	 * this also avoids killing TDX in the first kernel, which would
>> +	 * require more complicated handling.
>> +	 */
> 
> This is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much information to stick in a generic
> function.  Just call tdx_reset_memory() and make the argument about

Hi Dave,

Thanks for review.

Agreed too much info here.  But I don't quite understand your second 
sentence here.  Can I have your suggestion again?

> 
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP
>>   	if (image->preserve_context)
>>   		save_processor_state();
>> +	else
>> +		tdx_reset_memory();
>> +#else
>> +	tdx_reset_memory();
>>   #endif
> 
> Wow, that's awfully hard to read.  I really wish folks' gag reflex would
> kick in when they see stuff like this to get them to spend an additional
> 15 seconds to turn this into:
> 
> 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP) && image->preserve_context)
> 		save_processor_state();
> 	else
> 		tdx_reset_memory();
> 

Yeah this is way better, but as Kirill pointed out we will have build 
error when both SUSPEND and HIBERNATION is off.

Maybe below?

#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP
	if (image->preserve_context)
		save_processor_state();
	else
#endif
	tdx_reset_memory();


>>   	save_ftrace_enabled = __ftrace_enabled_save();
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
>> index 9f1fed458a32..0537b1b76c2b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>   #include <linux/suspend.h>
>>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/reboot.h>
>>   #include <asm/page.h>
>>   #include <asm/special_insns.h>
>>   #include <asm/msr-index.h>
>> @@ -54,6 +55,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(tdx_module_lock);
>>   /* All TDX-usable memory regions.  Protected by mem_hotplug_lock. */
>>   static LIST_HEAD(tdx_memlist);
>>   
>> +static bool tdx_rebooting;
>> +
>>   typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args);
>>   
>>   static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args)
>> @@ -1187,6 +1190,9 @@ static int __tdx_enable(void)
>>   {
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> +	if (tdx_rebooting)
>> +		return -EAGAIN;
> 
> This whole 'tdx_rebooting' deserves to at least be in its own patch.
> Also -EAGAIN seems to be a really odd return code for a permanent failure.

Will move to a separate patch.

How about just -EINVAL?

> 
>>   	ret = init_tdx_module();
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		pr_err("module initialization failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> @@ -1420,6 +1426,90 @@ static struct notifier_block tdx_memory_nb = {
>>   	.notifier_call = tdx_memory_notifier,
>>   };
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Convert TDX private pages back to normal on platforms with
>> + * "partial write machine check" erratum.
>> + *
>> + * Called from machine_kexec() before booting to the new kernel.
>> + */
>> +void tdx_reset_memory(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TDX_HOST_PLATFORM))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Kernel read/write to TDX private memory doesn't
>> +	 * cause machine check on hardware w/o this erratum.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TDX_PW_MCE))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Called from kexec() when only rebooting cpu is alive */
>> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(num_online_cpus() != 1);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * tdx_reboot_notifier() waits until ongoing TDX module
>> +	 * initialization to finish, and module initialization is
>> +	 * rejected after that.  Therefore @tdx_module_status is
>> +	 * stable here and can be read w/o holding lock.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (tdx_module_status != TDX_MODULE_INITIALIZED)
>> +		return;
> 
> kexec() can't happen until after reboot notifiers are called.
> tdx_reboot_notifier() makes 'tdx_module_status' stable, so no lock is
> needed.
> 
> Right?

Yes.  I can replace the comment with your words.

> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Flush cache of all TDX private memory _before_ converting
>> +	 * them back to avoid silent memory corruption.
>> +	 */
>> +	native_wbinvd();
> 
> Since this is single-threaded, it also needs to mention where all the
> other CPU caches got flushed.

OK will point out.

> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Convert PAMTs back to normal.  All other cpus are already
>> +	 * dead and TDMRs/PAMTs are stable.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Ideally it's better to cover all types of TDX private pages
>> +	 * here, but it's impractical:
>> +	 *
>> +	 *  - There's no existing infrastructure to tell whether a page
>> +	 *    is TDX private memory or not.
>> +	 *
>> +	 *  - Using SEAMCALL to query TDX module isn't feasible either:
>> +	 *    - VMX has been turned off by reaching here so SEAMCALL
>> +	 *      cannot be made;
>> +	 *    - Even SEAMCALL can be made the result from TDX module may
> 
> 		    ^ if     ^ a          ^,
> 

Thanks.  Will add.

>> +	 *      not be accurate (e.g., remote CPU can be stopped while
>> +	 *      the kernel is in the middle of reclaiming TDX private
>> +	 *      page and doing MOVDIR64B).
>> +	 *
>> +	 * One temporary solution could be just converting all memory
>> +	 * pages, but it's problematic too, because not all pages are
>> +	 * mapped as writable in direct mapping.  It can be done by
>> +	 * switching to the identical mapping for kexec() or a new page
>> +	 * table which maps all pages as writable, but the complexity is
>> +	 * overkill.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Thus instead of doing something dramatic to convert all pages,
>> +	 * only convert PAMTs here.  Other kernel components which use
>> +	 * TDX need to do the conversion on their own by intercepting the
>> +	 * rebooting/shutdown notifier (KVM already does that).
>> +	 */
> 
> I'd leave the extended alternatives discussion in the changelog, not here.
> 
> Focus on what _this_ is doing and why it is imperfect:
> 
>   1. Just reset the PAMDs
>   2. This leaves A, B, and C undealt with
>   3. The risk of leaving those is ...
> 

Agreed. Will do.

> 
>> +	tdmrs_reset_pamt_all(&tdx_tdmr_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tdx_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long mode,
>> +			       void *unused)
>> +{
>> +	/* Wait ongoing TDX initialization to finish */
>> +	mutex_lock(&tdx_module_lock);
>> +	tdx_rebooting = true;
>> +	mutex_unlock(&tdx_module_lock);
>> +
>> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
>> +}
> 
> Why is 'tdx_rebooting' a new variable instead of a new state in
> tdx_module_status?
> 

I think we can but I believe using tdx_rebooting is more clear.

For instance, if we want to add a new state TDX_MODULE_ABORT for this 
case, when tdx_reboot_notifier() is called after module initialization, 
then the tdx_module_status (which is already TDX_MODULE_INITIALIZED) 
will be overwritten and we will lose the information that module 
initialization has been done successfully.

We may be able to avoid these using more complicated logic but I think 
using a separate tdx_rebooting is straightforward.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31 11:31 [PATCH 0/4] TDX host: kexec() support Huang, Kai
2024-01-31 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/coco: Add a new CC attribute to unify cache flush during kexec Huang, Kai
2024-02-19 16:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-19 19:45     ` Tom Lendacky
2024-02-19 20:32       ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-19 22:09         ` Tom Lendacky
2024-02-20  2:57           ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-20 14:40             ` Tom Lendacky
2024-02-20 14:28           ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-20 14:47             ` Tom Lendacky
2024-02-20 20:07               ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-20 22:30                 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-02-21  1:38                   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-21  9:28                   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22 11:49                     ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-23  3:13                       ` Dave Young
2024-02-23 10:41                     ` Dave Young
2024-02-28  2:54                       ` Dave Young
2024-02-28  9:21                         ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 11:02                           ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-28 22:21                             ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 10:44                         ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-20  3:12     ` Huang, Kai
2024-01-31 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/virt/tdx: Advertise the CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_INCOHERENT for TDX host Huang, Kai
2024-01-31 17:11   ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-01 14:42     ` Huang, Kai
2024-01-31 11:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/kexec(): Reset TDX private memory on platforms with TDX erratum Huang, Kai
2024-01-31 21:21   ` Dave Hansen
2024-01-31 22:03     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-01 14:22       ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-01 14:39         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-01 14:47           ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-01 16:57           ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-05  6:49             ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-01 14:35     ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2024-02-02  0:54   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-02-05  6:44     ` Huang, Kai
2024-01-31 11:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/virt/tdx: Remove the !KEXEC_CORE dependency Huang, Kai
2024-02-01 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/4] TDX host: kexec() support Tom Lendacky
2024-02-05  6:50   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-06 18:56     ` Kalra, Ashish
2024-02-07  1:43       ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a139b1e0-7737-4c20-842c-64457dba17ca@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®