Re: [PATCH 0/4] TDX host: kexec() support

["Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>]

On 2/02/2024 2:28 am, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/31/24 05:31, Huang, Kai wrote:
>> Currently kexec() support and TDX host are muturally exclusive in the
>> Kconfig.  This series adds the TDX host kexec support so that they can
>> work together and can be enabled at the same time in the Kconfig.
>>
>> This follows Dave's suggestion to add the CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_INCOHERENT
>> attribute to unify both Intel and AMD, instead of having Intel/AMD
>> specific checks around [1].
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I've tested on my TDX testig machine but I don't have AMD machine to
>> test.  I highly appreciate if you or any AMD guy can help to review
>> and/or test this series to make sure I didn't break anything.
> 
> Hi Kai,
> 
> I'm adding Ashish to the thread to take a look at this as he's been 
> focusing on kexec related things recently.
> 

Thanks Tom.

Hi Ashish,

I appreciate if you can help to review and test the first patch.  Thanks!