2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon

2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon

[Andy Jefferson]

In the 2.4.20 kernel changelog I see comments about having consistent
DRM modules with XFree4.2.0. I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a Dell
laptop and would like to get DRI working. Whenever I use any 2.4.*
(including 2.4.20) kernel I get the following messages in
/var/log/XFree86.0.log, and DRM is not enabled. Is this supposed to be
working in 2.4.20 ? I am using a Mandrake 8.2 system (except for the
kernel).


(II) RADEON(0): [drm] loaded kernel module for "radeon" driver
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "PCI:1:0:0"
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xd1bb1000
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xd1bb1000 to 0x40026000
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xe0000000
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a version
mismatch.
[dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.2.x is
needed.
[dri] see http://gatos.sf.net/ for an updated module
[dri] Disabling DRI.
(EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel

Thx
-- 
Andy

Re: 2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon

[Andy Jefferson]

> > In the 2.4.20 kernel changelog I see comments about having consistent
> > DRM modules with XFree4.2.0. I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a Dell
> > laptop and would like to get DRI working. Whenever I use any 2.4.*
> > (including 2.4.20) kernel I get the following messages in
> > /var/log/XFree86.0.log, and DRM is not enabled. Is this supposed to be
> > working in 2.4.20 ? I am using a Mandrake 8.2 system (except for the
> > kernel).
> > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
> > [dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.2.x is needed.
> > [dri] see http://gatos.sf.net/ for an updated module
> > [dri] Disabling DRI.


> Works for me.
> Debian GNU/Linux unstable distribution
> 
> You did enable radeon DRM drivers in the kernel config right? For your
> chipset and for the Radeon, right?

Well, yes. I'm getting VERSION CONFLICT messages, and not that there is no radeon.o module. For the record, 
what I get from dmesg is

Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
[drm] AGP 0.99 on Unknown @ 0xd0000000 256MB
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.1.1 20010405 on minor 0

FWIW I have in the kernel

/dev/agpgart set to Module
I830M support set to Yes
Build old DRM 4.0 drivers set to No
DRM 4.1 ATI Radeon set to Module

So the version of the kernel module is 1.1.1 20010405 (with 2.4.19, AND 2.4.20) , yet the XFree86 drivers need 1.2.* as per the original message in the XFree86.0.log. Why is the kernel using 1.1.1 and not 1.2.* ?

Thx

--
Andy

_______________________________________________________________________
Freeserve AnyTime, only £13.99 per month with one month's FREE trial!
For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on 0800 970 8890

Re: 2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon

[Frank Jacobberger]

Andy Jefferson wrote:

>>>In the 2.4.20 kernel changelog I see comments about having consistent
>>>DRM modules with XFree4.2.0. I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a Dell
>>>laptop and would like to get DRI working. Whenever I use any 2.4.*
>>>(including 2.4.20) kernel I get the following messages in
>>>/var/log/XFree86.0.log, and DRM is not enabled. Is this supposed to be
>>>working in 2.4.20 ? I am using a Mandrake 8.2 system (except for the
>>>kernel).
>>>(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
>>>[dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.2.x is needed.
>>>[dri] see http://gatos.sf.net/ for an updated module
>>>[dri] Disabling DRI.
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>  
>
>>Works for me.
>>Debian GNU/Linux unstable distribution
>>
>>You did enable radeon DRM drivers in the kernel config right? For your
>>chipset and for the Radeon, right?
>>    
>>
>
>Well, yes. I'm getting VERSION CONFLICT messages, and not that there is no radeon.o module. For the record, 
>what I get from dmesg is
>
>Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
>agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
>agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
>agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
>[drm] AGP 0.99 on Unknown @ 0xd0000000 256MB
>[drm] Initialized radeon 1.1.1 20010405 on minor 0
>
>FWIW I have in the kernel
>
>/dev/agpgart set to Module
>I830M support set to Yes
>Build old DRM 4.0 drivers set to No
>DRM 4.1 ATI Radeon set to Module
>
>So the version of the kernel module is 1.1.1 20010405 (with 2.4.19, AND 2.4.20) , yet the XFree86 drivers need 1.2.* as per the original message in the XFree86.0.log. Why is the kernel using 1.1.1 and not 1.???
>
You need to grab the later drm kernel.

>  
>

Re: 2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon

[Joshua Kwan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2400 bytes --]

I'm stumped, really. Try building it INTO the kernel (ie Y instead of
M.) This is what I did and it works. Or maybe you should get XFree86
4.2.1, which is what I have: 

XFree86 Version 4.2.1.1 (Debian 4.2.1-4 20021123003806
branden@debian.org) / X Window System

Hope things work out.

-Josh

Rabid cheeseburgers forced Andy Jefferson <andy@ajsoft.freeserve.co.uk>
to write this on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 14:32:33 +0000:	

> > > In the 2.4.20 kernel changelog I see comments about having
> > > consistent DRM modules with XFree4.2.0. I have a Radeon Mobility
> > > M6 LY in a Dell laptop and would like to get DRI working. Whenever
> > > I use any 2.4.*(including 2.4.20) kernel I get the following
> > > messages in/var/log/XFree86.0.log, and DRM is not enabled. Is this
> > > supposed to be working in 2.4.20 ? I am using a Mandrake 8.2
> > > system (except for the kernel).
> > > (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a
> > > version mismatch.[dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but
> > > version 1.2.x is needed.[dri] see http://gatos.sf.net/ for an
> > > updated module[dri] Disabling DRI.
> 
> 
> > Works for me.
> > Debian GNU/Linux unstable distribution
> > 
> > You did enable radeon DRM drivers in the kernel config right? For
> > your chipset and for the Radeon, right?
> 
> Well, yes. I'm getting VERSION CONFLICT messages, and not that there
> is no radeon.o module. For the record, what I get from dmesg is
> 
> Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
> agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
> agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
> agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
> [drm] AGP 0.99 on Unknown @ 0xd0000000 256MB
> [drm] Initialized radeon 1.1.1 20010405 on minor 0
> 
> FWIW I have in the kernel
> 
> /dev/agpgart set to Module
> I830M support set to Yes
> Build old DRM 4.0 drivers set to No
> DRM 4.1 ATI Radeon set to Module
> 
> So the version of the kernel module is 1.1.1 20010405 (with 2.4.19,
> AND 2.4.20) , yet the XFree86 drivers need 1.2.* as per the original
> message in the XFree86.0.log. Why is the kernel using 1.1.1 and not
> 1.2.* ?
> 
> Thx
> 
> --
> Andy
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> __ Freeserve AnyTime, only £13.99 per month with one month's FREE
> trial! For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or
> call free on 0800 970 8890
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: 2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon

[Joshua Kwan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]

I think it makes sense, since DRI is designed to work on top of agpgart.
Can someone confirm this guess for me? Or make me look like a moron?

BTW, the following quoted message was not posted to lkml previously, so
I am attaching it in its entirety.

-Josh

Rabid cheeseburgers forced Eric Blade<eblade@blackmagik.dynup.net> to
write this on 01 Dec 2002 19:56:42-0500:	

> On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 15:42, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > I'm stumped, really. Try building it INTO the kernel (ie Y instead
> > of M.) This is what I did and it works. Or maybe you should get
> > XFree86 4.2.1, which is what I have: 
> 
> 
> This has little to do with the topic at hand, but I figured since we
> were discussing the Radeon and DRM/DRI, I thought I'd ask this one.
> 
>  Am I correct in my assumption that the Radeon DRI code does not work
> with PCI versions of the Radeon?  I have a Radeon 7500 PCI (since this
> box that's designed as a "server" doesn't have AGP ports), and have
> been completely unable to get DRI to work at all.  I didn't have any
> problems on my other box, which has an AGP Voodoo 3 in it.
> 
>   Thanks,
>       - Eric
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]