mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:33:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288186405.2709.117.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288173442.15336.1490.camel@twins>

Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 11:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 08:07 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > -     irqctx = &per_cpu(hardirq_stack, cpu);
> > > +     irqctx = (union irq_ctx *)__get_free_pages(THREAD_FLAGS, THREAD_ORDER);
> > 
> > Hmm, then we lose NUMA affinity for stacks. 
> 
> I guess we could use:
> 
>   alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), THREAD_FLAGS, THREAD_ORDER);
> 
> 

Anyway, I just discovered per_cpu data on my machine (NUMA capable) all
sit on a single node, if 32bit kernel used.

# cat /proc/buddyinfo 
Node 0, zone      DMA      0      1      0      1      2      1      1      0      1      1      3 
Node 0, zone   Normal     94    251     81     16      3      2      1      2      1      2    187 
Node 0, zone  HighMem    113     88     47     36     18      5      4      3      2      0    268 
Node 1, zone  HighMem    154     97     43     16      9      4      3      2      3      2    482 

# dmesg | grep pcpu
[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: s41920 r0 d23616 u65536 alloc=1*2097152
[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 


dual socket machine (E5540  @ 2.53GHz), total of 8 cores, 16 threads.

# dmesg | grep irqstack
[    0.000000] CPU 0 irqstacks, hard=f4a00000 soft=f4a02000
[    0.173397] CPU 1 irqstacks, hard=f4a10000 soft=f4a12000
[    0.284939] CPU 2 irqstacks, hard=f4a20000 soft=f4a22000
[    0.392908] CPU 3 irqstacks, hard=f4a30000 soft=f4a32000
[    0.500757] CPU 4 irqstacks, hard=f4a40000 soft=f4a42000
[    0.608713] CPU 5 irqstacks, hard=f4a50000 soft=f4a52000
[    0.716665] CPU 6 irqstacks, hard=f4a60000 soft=f4a62000
[    0.828668] CPU 7 irqstacks, hard=f4a70000 soft=f4a72000
[    0.936555] CPU 8 irqstacks, hard=f4a80000 soft=f4a82000
[    1.044525] CPU 9 irqstacks, hard=f4a90000 soft=f4a92000
[    1.152470] CPU 10 irqstacks, hard=f4aa0000 soft=f4aa2000
[    1.260367] CPU 11 irqstacks, hard=f4ab0000 soft=f4ab2000
[    1.368313] CPU 12 irqstacks, hard=f4ac0000 soft=f4ac2000
[    1.476313] CPU 13 irqstacks, hard=f4ad0000 soft=f4ad2000
[    1.584167] CPU 14 irqstacks, hard=f4ae0000 soft=f4ae2000
[    1.692222] CPU 15 irqstacks, hard=f4af0000 soft=f4af2000


With a 64bit kernel its fine :

[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: s76992 r8192 d21312 u131072 alloc=1*2097152
[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 
[    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [1] 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 

I presume node 1 having only HighMem could be the reason ?




  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45       ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49             ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-27 13:42                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                           ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45                                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40                       ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06         ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46           ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50   ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288186405.2709.117.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®