From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:27:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288283277.11523.18.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikmNc7qqDzoff_3i_FRbG=pmOC7TG3eeZnmvaTD@mail.gmail.com>
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds a écrit :
> Hmm. More people added to the discussion..
>
> This code seems to go back all the way to commit 19770b32609b: "mm:
> filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask". Which was back in
> April 2008. and got merged into 2.6.26.
>
> And I'd be happy to commit it (in fact, I was going to), but when
> looking for other uses of first_zones_zonelist(), I found
> local_memory_node() which does the exact same thing: ignore the return
> value, and unconditionally dereference the resulting 'zone' variable.
>
> And so does - although less obviously - mm/vmscan.c for the
> wait_iff_confgested() thing.
>
> So are those buggy too, since first_zones_zonelist() can apparently return NULL?
>
> Please advise...
>
local_memory_node() is for ia64 only, and it is a bit different :
(void)first_zones_zonelist(node_zonelist(node, GFP_KERNEL),
gfp_zone(GFP_KERNEL),
NULL,
&zone);
Apparently node_zonelist(node, GFP_KERNEL) returns a pointer to
something that must have a zone suitable for GFP_KERNEL
While the code I tried to fix uses :
zonelist = &NODE_DATA(numa_node_id())->node_zonelists[0];
without any guarantee it contains a LOWMEM zone
Also check commit 7eb54824b76793dd86afb54f182ef9aa64b3a45a
for a similar fix in the past.
About do_try_to_free_pages(), I can not comment on this one, sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-28 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45 ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49 ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 5:43 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 6:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33 ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-28 16:45 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40 ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 6:43 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04 ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 6:46 ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:54 ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50 ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288283277.11523.18.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®