mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:30:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288269018.2649.421.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC965FF.8000601@kernel.org>

Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 14:01 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Hello, Eric.
> 
> On 10/27/2010 10:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > I changed the User/Kernel split from 3G/1G to 1G/3G so that I have
> > LOWMEM on both nodes. Still pcpu allocates all percpu from node0.
> ...
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:64 nr_cpumask_bits:64 nr_cpu_ids:16 nr_node_ids:8
> > [    0.000000] PERCPU: Embedded 16 pages/cpu @bea00000 s41984 r0 d23552 u131072
> > [    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: s41984 r0 d23552 u131072 alloc=1*2097152
> > [    0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=0 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=1 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=2 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=3 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=4 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=5 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=6 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=7 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=8 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=9 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=10 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=11 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=12 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=13 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=14 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [    0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=15 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> 
> So, this is the problem.  percpu uses early_cpu_to_node() to determine
> which cpu belongs to which NUMA node and according to it all CPUs are
> on node 0, so percpu is configured accordingly.  I have no idea why
> early_cpu_to_node() is set up like that tho.  Ingo, Thomas, any ideas?
> 

CONFIG_X86_32

early_cpu_to_node() uses cpu_to_node_map[]

Set in map_cpu_to_node(), _after_ pcpu stuff if you look at my previous
dmesg output.

arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = 0 };

static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node)
{
	printk(KERN_INFO "Mapping cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node);
	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
	cpu_to_node_map[cpu] = node;
}

[    0.013437] Mapping cpu 0 to node 1
[    0.172421] Mapping cpu 1 to node 0
[    0.280357] Mapping cpu 2 to node 1
[    0.388310] Mapping cpu 3 to node 0
[    0.496494] Mapping cpu 4 to node 1
[    0.604182] Mapping cpu 5 to node 0
[    0.712050] Mapping cpu 6 to node 1
[    0.820102] Mapping cpu 7 to node 0
...


I added this bit in acpi_map_cpu2node(), just in case.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index c05872a..f995d3a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -561,6 +561,7 @@ static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle,
int cpu, int physid)
 	numa_set_node(cpu, nid);
 #else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
 	apicid_2_node[physid] = nid;
+	pr_err("cpu_to_node_map(cpu=%d)=%d\n", cpu, nid);
 	cpu_to_node_map[cpu] = nid;
 #endif
 


Seems to be not called.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-28 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45       ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49             ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                           ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45                                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                             ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-28 14:40                       ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06         ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46           ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25             ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50   ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288269018.2649.421.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®