From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:30:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288269018.2649.421.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC965FF.8000601@kernel.org>
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 14:01 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Hello, Eric.
>
> On 10/27/2010 10:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > I changed the User/Kernel split from 3G/1G to 1G/3G so that I have
> > LOWMEM on both nodes. Still pcpu allocates all percpu from node0.
> ...
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:64 nr_cpumask_bits:64 nr_cpu_ids:16 nr_node_ids:8
> > [ 0.000000] PERCPU: Embedded 16 pages/cpu @bea00000 s41984 r0 d23552 u131072
> > [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: s41984 r0 d23552 u131072 alloc=1*2097152
> > [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=0 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=1 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=2 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=3 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=4 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=5 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=6 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=7 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=8 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=9 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=10 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=11 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=12 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=13 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=14 early_cpu_to_node()=0
> > [ 0.000000] setup_percpu: cpu=15 early_cpu_to_node()=0
>
> So, this is the problem. percpu uses early_cpu_to_node() to determine
> which cpu belongs to which NUMA node and according to it all CPUs are
> on node 0, so percpu is configured accordingly. I have no idea why
> early_cpu_to_node() is set up like that tho. Ingo, Thomas, any ideas?
>
CONFIG_X86_32
early_cpu_to_node() uses cpu_to_node_map[]
Set in map_cpu_to_node(), _after_ pcpu stuff if you look at my previous
dmesg output.
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = 0 };
static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Mapping cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
cpu_to_node_map[cpu] = node;
}
[ 0.013437] Mapping cpu 0 to node 1
[ 0.172421] Mapping cpu 1 to node 0
[ 0.280357] Mapping cpu 2 to node 1
[ 0.388310] Mapping cpu 3 to node 0
[ 0.496494] Mapping cpu 4 to node 1
[ 0.604182] Mapping cpu 5 to node 0
[ 0.712050] Mapping cpu 6 to node 1
[ 0.820102] Mapping cpu 7 to node 0
...
I added this bit in acpi_map_cpu2node(), just in case.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index c05872a..f995d3a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -561,6 +561,7 @@ static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle,
int cpu, int physid)
numa_set_node(cpu, nid);
#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
apicid_2_node[physid] = nid;
+ pr_err("cpu_to_node_map(cpu=%d)=%d\n", cpu, nid);
cpu_to_node_map[cpu] = nid;
#endif
Seems to be not called.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-28 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45 ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49 ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 5:43 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 6:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33 ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-28 14:40 ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 6:43 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04 ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 6:46 ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:54 ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50 ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288269018.2649.421.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®