From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Subject: [RFC 0/8] CPU reclaiming for SCHED_DEADLINE
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:24:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452785094-3086-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it> (raw)
Hi all,
this patchset implements CPU reclaiming (using the GRUB algorithm[1])
for SCHED_DEADLINE: basically, this feature allows SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
to consume more than their reserved runtime, up to a maximum fraction
of the CPU time (so that other tasks are left some spare CPU time to
execute), if this does not break the guarantees of other SCHED_DEADLINE
tasks.
I send this RFC because I think the code still needs some work and/or
cleanups (or maybe the patches should be splitted or merged in a different
way), but I'd like to check if there is interest in merging this feature
and if the current implementation strategy is reasonable.
I added in cc the usual people interested in SCHED_DEADLINE patches; if
you think that I should have added someone else, let me know (or please
forward these patches to interested people).
The implemented CPU reclaiming algorithm is based on tracking the
utilization U_act of active tasks (first 5 patches), and modifying the
runtime accounting rule (see patch 0006). The original GRUB algorithm is
modified as described in [2] to support multiple CPUs (the original
algorithm only considered one single CPU, this one tracks U_act per
runqueue) and to leave an "unreclaimable" fraction of CPU time to non
SCHED_DEADLINE tasks (the original algorithm can consume 100% of the CPU
time, starving all the other tasks).
I tried to split the patches so that the whole patchset can be better
understood; if they should be organized in a different way, let me know.
The first 5 patches (tracking of per-runqueue active utilization) can
be useful for frequency scaling too (the tracked "active utilization"
gives a clear hint about how much the core speed can be reduced without
compromising the SCHED_DEADLINE guarantees):
- patches 0001 and 0002 implement a simple tracking of the active
utilization that is too optimistic from the theoretical point of
view
- patch 0003 is mainly useful for debugging this patchset and can
be removed without problems
- patch 0004 implements the "active utilization" tracking algorithm
described in [1,2]. It uses a timer (named "inactive timer" here) to
decrease U_act at the correct time (I called it the "0-lag time").
I am working on an alternative implementation that does not use
additional timers, but it is not ready yet; I'll post it when ready
and tested
- patch 0005 tracks the utilization of the tasks that can execute on
each runqueue. It is a pessimistic approximation of U_act (so, if
used instead of U_act it allows to reclaim less CPU time, but does
not break SCHED_DEADLINE guarantees)
- patches 0006-0008 implement the reclaiming algorithm.
[1] http://retis.sssup.it/~lipari/papers/lipariBaruah2000.pdf
[2] http://disi.unitn.it/~abeni/reclaiming/rtlws14-grub.pdf
Juri Lelli (1):
sched/deadline: add some tracepoints
Luca Abeni (7):
Track the active utilisation
Correctly track the active utilisation for migrating tasks
Improve the tracking of active utilisation
Track the "total rq utilisation" too
GRUB accounting
Make GRUB a task's flag
Do not reclaim the whole CPU bandwidth
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
include/trace/events/sched.h | 69 ++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +-
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 214 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched/sched.h | 12 +++
6 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 15:24 Luca Abeni [this message]
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 1/8] Track the active utilisation Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 6:37 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 8:07 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 2/8] Correctly track the active utilisation for migrating tasks Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 3/8] sched/deadline: add some tracepoints Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 4/8] Improve the tracking of active utilisation Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 6:48 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 9:27 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-19 12:20 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-19 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-27 13:36 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-27 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-27 14:45 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-28 13:08 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <CAKfTPtAt0gTwk9aAZN238NT1O-zJvxVQDTh2QN_KxAnE61xMww@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-28 13:48 ` luca abeni
2016-01-28 13:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2016-01-28 11:14 ` luca abeni
2016-01-28 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-28 13:41 ` luca abeni
2016-01-28 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-28 21:15 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 8:10 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 5/8] Track the "total rq utilisation" too Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 8:04 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 6:50 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 9:15 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-29 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-29 21:21 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 6/8] GRUB accounting Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 8:05 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 7/8] Make GRUB a task's flag Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 8:15 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 9:08 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 8/8] Do not reclaim the whole CPU bandwidth Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 8:21 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15 9:49 ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-26 12:52 ` luca abeni
2016-01-27 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-02 20:53 ` Luca Abeni
2016-02-03 11:30 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-03 13:28 ` luca abeni
2016-01-19 10:11 ` [RFC 0/8] CPU reclaiming for SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2016-01-19 11:50 ` Luca Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452785094-3086-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®