mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] Make GRUB a task's flag
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:15:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5698AAAB.9040606@unitn.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160114195651.GG6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 01/14/2016 08:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote:
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -48,5 +48,6 @@
>>    * For the sched_{set,get}attr() calls
>>    */
>>   #define SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK	0x01
>> +#define SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM		0x02
>
> With an eye towards unpriv usage of SCHED_DEADLINE, this isn't something
> we could allow unpriv tasks, right? Since (IIRC) GRUB will allow eating
> all !deadline time.
The original algorithm, yes, it allowed to use 100% of the CPU time, starving
all !deadline tasks.
But in this patchset I modified the algorithm to allow reclaiming only a
fraction U_max of the CPU time... So, 1-U_max can be left free for !deadline.


> Something with an average runtime/budget that also puts limits on the
> max (say 2*avg) would be far more amenable to be exposed to unpriv
> tasks, except since that would directly result in an average tardiness
> bound this might be non-trivial to combine with tasks not opting for
> this.
I'll try to think about this... The advantage of GRUB is that a theoretically
sound algorithm already existed; here, we would need to design the algorithm
so that it does not break the SCHED_DEADLINE guarantees. Anyway, this is an
interesting challenge, I'll work on it :)



			Thanks,
				Luca

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-14 15:24 [RFC 0/8] CPU reclaiming for SCHED_DEADLINE Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 1/8] Track the active utilisation Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 16:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  6:37     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  8:07     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 2/8] Correctly track the active utilisation for migrating tasks Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 3/8] sched/deadline: add some tracepoints Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 4/8] Improve the tracking of active utilisation Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 17:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  6:48     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  9:27     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-19 12:20     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-19 13:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-27 13:36         ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-27 14:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-27 14:45             ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-28 13:08               ` Vincent Guittot
     [not found]               ` <CAKfTPtAt0gTwk9aAZN238NT1O-zJvxVQDTh2QN_KxAnE61xMww@mail.gmail.com>
2016-01-28 13:48                 ` luca abeni
2016-01-28 13:56                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-01-28 11:14             ` luca abeni
2016-01-28 12:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-28 13:41                 ` luca abeni
2016-01-28 14:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-28 21:15                     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  8:10     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15  8:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 5/8] Track the "total rq utilisation" too Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  8:04     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  6:50     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15  8:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  9:15         ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-29 15:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-29 21:21             ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 6/8] GRUB accounting Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  8:05     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 7/8] Make GRUB a task's flag Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  8:15     ` Luca Abeni [this message]
2016-01-15  8:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  9:08         ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 15:24 ` [RFC 8/8] Do not reclaim the whole CPU bandwidth Luca Abeni
2016-01-14 19:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  8:21     ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-15  8:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-15  9:49         ` Luca Abeni
2016-01-26 12:52         ` luca abeni
2016-01-27 14:44           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-02 20:53             ` Luca Abeni
2016-02-03 11:30               ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-03 13:28                 ` luca abeni
2016-01-19 10:11 ` [RFC 0/8] CPU reclaiming for SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2016-01-19 11:50   ` Luca Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5698AAAB.9040606@unitn.it \
    --to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome