mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Rafael Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86" <x86@kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/16] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses on all CPUs
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 08:45:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527435965-202085-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527435965-202085-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

#AC for split lock is set up when each CPU is brought up. By default,
kernel disables the feature bit 29 in TEST_CTL MSR on each CPU.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h     |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c   |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index 083ef6d05c45..00f453fd44ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ unsigned int x86_stepping(unsigned int sig);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC
 void detect_split_lock_ac(void);
 bool do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code);
+void setup_split_lock(void);
 #else /* CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC */
 static inline void detect_split_lock_ac(void) {}
 static inline bool
@@ -50,5 +51,7 @@ do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
 {
 	return false;
 }
+
+static inline void setup_split_lock(void) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC */
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index b02d90320ec6..af3f23170503 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1382,6 +1382,8 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	/* Init Machine Check Exception if available. */
 	mcheck_cpu_init(c);
 
+	setup_split_lock();
+
 	select_idle_routine(c);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c
index 82f110759662..c72c0517c6ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct delayed_work, reenable_delayed_work);
 static unsigned long disable_split_lock_jiffies;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(reexecute_split_lock_mutex);
 
+static int split_lock_ac_kernel = DISABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC;
+
 /* Detete feature of #AC for split lock by probing bit 29 in MSR_TEST_CTL. */
 void detect_split_lock_ac(void)
 {
@@ -84,6 +86,18 @@ static void _setup_split_lock(int split_lock_ac_val)
 	wrmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTL, val);
 }
 
+void setup_split_lock(void)
+{
+	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC))
+		return;
+
+	_setup_split_lock(split_lock_ac_kernel);
+
+	pr_info_once("#AC execption for split lock is %sd\n",
+		     split_lock_ac_kernel == ENABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC ? "enable"
+		     : "disable");
+}
+
 static void wait_for_reexecution(void)
 {
 	while (time_before(jiffies, disable_split_lock_jiffies +
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-27 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-27 15:45 [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 10:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 11:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 22:41       ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 22:57         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 23:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 23:18       ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-23  9:08         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23  4:20     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-23  9:17       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 15:05         ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-24  0:55           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24  1:17             ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-24  6:43               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-27 15:45 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 20:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-27 23:35     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-28  7:53       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 14:23         ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-28 14:54           ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions in clear_cpufeature() Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in firmware in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 15:11     ` Alan Cox
2018-06-26  9:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26  9:40         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 11:02         ` Alan Cox
2018-06-26 11:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG to control #AC for split lock at boot time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] x86/split_lock: Add a debugfs interface to allow user to enable or disable #AC for split lock during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 18:43   ` Greg KH
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG to control #AC for split lock from kernel at boot time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] x86/split_lock: Add a debugfs interface to allow user to change how to handle split lock in kernel mode during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] x86/split_lock: Add debugfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] x86/split_lock: Add debugfs interface to show and control firmware setting for split lock Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and debugfs interface for testing #AC for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] x86/split_lock: Add user space split lock test in selftest Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:25   ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 17:28     ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:40       ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:38   ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 20:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 20:18   ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 20:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 22:00       ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 22:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:18           ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-21 22:42             ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22  8:11               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22  9:30               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 22:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 23:05           ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22  8:19             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:11         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:43           ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 22:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-23 18:47           ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22  9:18         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22  9:22         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22  9:25         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22  9:28         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 20:36     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1527435965-202085-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome