From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Rafael Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@linux.intel.com>,
"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86" <x86@kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/16] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 08:45:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527435965-202085-8-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527435965-202085-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
During suspend or hibernation, system enters firmware. To avoid potential
firmware issue that may generate #AC exception for split locked accesses,
handle the #AC as fatal exception, and block suspend or hibernation,
the setting of #AC for split lock is restored to firmware setting during
suspend or hibernation. When resuming from suspend or hibernation, the
split lock setting is restored to kernel setting.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index 45fec729c470..f2ca84deccc6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ void detect_split_lock_ac(void);
bool do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code);
void setup_split_lock(void);
void restore_split_lock_ac_firmware(void);
+void restore_split_lock_ac_kernel(void);
#else /* CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC */
static inline void detect_split_lock_ac(void) {}
static inline bool
@@ -55,5 +56,6 @@ do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
static inline void setup_split_lock(void) {}
static inline void restore_split_lock_ac_firmware(void) {}
+static inline void restore_split_lock_ac_kernel(void) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c
index 9e47f8174a47..82440740b2b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/test_ctl.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
+#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
#define DISABLE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC 0
@@ -112,6 +113,15 @@ void restore_split_lock_ac_firmware(void)
restore_split_lock_ac(split_lock_ac_firmware);
}
+/* Restore kernel setting for #AC enable bit for split lock. */
+void restore_split_lock_ac_kernel(void)
+{
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_AC))
+ return;
+
+ restore_split_lock_ac(split_lock_ac_kernel);
+}
+
static void split_lock_cpu_reboot(void *unused)
{
restore_split_lock_ac_firmware();
@@ -247,11 +257,29 @@ static int split_lock_online(unsigned int cpu)
static int split_lock_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ restore_split_lock_ac_firmware();
cancel_delayed_work(&per_cpu(reenable_delayed_work, cpu));
return 0;
}
+static int split_lock_bsp_suspend(void)
+{
+ restore_split_lock_ac_firmware();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void split_lock_bsp_resume(void)
+{
+ restore_split_lock_ac_kernel();
+}
+
+static struct syscore_ops split_lock_syscore_ops = {
+ .suspend = split_lock_bsp_suspend,
+ .resume = split_lock_bsp_resume,
+};
+
static int __init split_lock_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -264,6 +292,8 @@ static int __init split_lock_init(void)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ register_syscore_ops(&split_lock_syscore_ops);
+
register_reboot_notifier(&split_lock_reboot_nb);
return 0;
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-27 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-27 15:45 [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 11:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 22:41 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 22:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 23:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-23 9:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 4:20 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-23 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 15:05 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-24 0:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24 1:17 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-24 6:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses on all CPUs Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-27 23:35 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-28 7:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 14:23 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-28 14:54 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions in clear_cpufeature() Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in firmware in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2018-06-26 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 11:02 ` Alan Cox
2018-06-26 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-27 15:45 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG to control #AC for split lock at boot time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] x86/split_lock: Add a debugfs interface to allow user to enable or disable #AC for split lock during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 18:43 ` Greg KH
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG to control #AC for split lock from kernel at boot time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] x86/split_lock: Add a debugfs interface to allow user to change how to handle split lock in kernel mode during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] x86/split_lock: Add debugfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] x86/split_lock: Add debugfs interface to show and control firmware setting for split lock Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and debugfs interface for testing #AC for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] x86/split_lock: Add user space split lock test in selftest Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:25 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:40 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:38 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 20:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 20:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 22:00 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 22:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-21 22:42 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 23:05 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:43 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 22:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-23 18:47 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 9:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 9:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 20:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1527435965-202085-8-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome