From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:11:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180622081146.GG2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621224203.GA18979@romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:18:19PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 06/21/2018 03:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > >> The control knob for kernel is to choose re-executing the faulting
> > >> instruction (default) or kernel panic. Kernel panic may be useful in hard
> > >> real time which has less tolerant to bad performance.
> > > The kernel should never trigger this, ever. Any #AC is a plain bug and
> > > should be fixed. So unconditional WARN+disable is suffient.
> >
> > It sounds like we need to start with that functionality and then if
> > Fenghua wants to do more, we have add-on patches that can be evaluated
> > by themselves.
>
> For split lock in kernel, by default, I just do warning, disable feature
> in #AC handler, continue to execute the faulting instruction, and re-enable
> #AC for split lock after a delay. This is the default behavior in the
> current patches.
>
> By "WAR+disable", you mean I just do this default behavior and remove the
> control knob?
No, remove all that broken delay crap, remove the knob. Basically remove
everything.
The handler really should be:
do_handle_ac_trap()
{
if (user_mode(regs)) {
send_signal(SIGBUS);
return;
}
WARN_ON(1);
disable_ac_on_all_cpus();
}
done. No broken delay code, no nothing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-27 15:45 Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 11:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 22:41 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 22:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 23:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-23 9:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 4:20 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-23 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 15:05 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-24 0:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24 1:17 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-24 6:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses on all CPUs Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-27 23:35 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-28 7:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 14:23 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-28 14:54 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions in clear_cpufeature() Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in firmware in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 19:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-22 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2018-06-26 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 11:02 ` Alan Cox
2018-06-26 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG to control #AC for split lock at boot time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] x86/split_lock: Add a debugfs interface to allow user to enable or disable #AC for split lock during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 18:43 ` Greg KH
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG to control #AC for split lock from kernel at boot time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] x86/split_lock: Add a debugfs interface to allow user to change how to handle split lock in kernel mode during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] x86/split_lock: Add debugfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] x86/split_lock: Add debugfs interface to show and control firmware setting for split lock Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and debugfs interface for testing #AC for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-05-27 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] x86/split_lock: Add user space split lock test in selftest Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 16:39 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:25 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:40 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-29 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-29 17:38 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 20:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 20:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 22:00 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 22:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-21 22:42 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-06-22 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 23:05 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 22:43 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-21 22:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-23 18:47 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-06-22 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 9:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-22 9:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 20:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180622081146.GG2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome