mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, gorcunov@gmail.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
	yao.jin@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 12/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all()
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:20:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593195620-116988-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593195620-116988-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The previous model-specific LBR and Architecture LBR (legacy way) use a
similar method to save/restore the LBR information, which directly
accesses the LBR registers. The codes which read/write a set of LBR
registers can be shared between them.

Factor out two functions which are used to read/write a set of LBR
registers.

Add lbr_info into structure x86_pmu, and use it to replace the hardcoded
LBR INFO MSR, because the LBR INFO MSR address of the previous
model-specific LBR is different from Architecture LBR. The MSR address
should be assigned at boot time. For now, only Sky Lake and later
platforms have the LBR INFO MSR.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c  | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 3d5fec4..459f1a5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64(void)
 		wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + i, 0);
 		wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to   + i, 0);
 		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + i, 0);
+			wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + i, 0);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -343,6 +343,11 @@ static inline void wrlbr_to(unsigned int idx, u64 val)
 	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + idx, val);
 }
 
+static inline void wrlbr_info(unsigned int idx, u64 val)
+{
+	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
+}
+
 static inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx)
 {
 	u64 val;
@@ -361,8 +366,44 @@ static inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned int idx)
 	return val;
 }
 
+static inline u64 rdlbr_info(unsigned int idx)
+{
+	u64 val;
+
+	rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static inline void
+wrlbr_all(struct lbr_entry *lbr, unsigned int idx, bool need_info)
+{
+	wrlbr_from(idx, lbr->from);
+	wrlbr_to(idx, lbr->to);
+	if (need_info)
+		wrlbr_info(idx, lbr->info);
+}
+
+static inline bool
+rdlbr_all(struct lbr_entry *lbr, unsigned int idx, bool need_info)
+{
+	u64 from = rdlbr_from(idx);
+
+	/* Don't read invalid entry */
+	if (!from)
+		return false;
+
+	lbr->from = from;
+	lbr->to = rdlbr_to(idx);
+	if (need_info)
+		lbr->info = rdlbr_info(idx);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 {
+	bool need_info = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO;
 	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
 	int i;
 	unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
@@ -371,11 +412,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 	mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < task_ctx->valid_lbrs; i++) {
 		lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
-		wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].from);
-		wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].to);
-
-		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
+		wrlbr_all(&task_ctx->lbr[i], lbr_idx, need_info);
 	}
 
 	for (; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
@@ -383,7 +420,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 		wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, 0);
 		wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, 0);
 		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, 0);
+			wrlbr_info(lbr_idx, 0);
 	}
 
 	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
@@ -423,22 +460,18 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
 {
+	bool need_info = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO;
 	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
 	unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
-	u64 tos, from;
+	u64 tos;
 	int i;
 
 	mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
 	tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
 		lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
-		from = rdlbr_from(lbr_idx);
-		if (!from)
+		if (!rdlbr_all(&task_ctx->lbr[i], lbr_idx, need_info))
 			break;
-		task_ctx->lbr[i].from = from;
-		task_ctx->lbr[i].to = rdlbr_to(lbr_idx);
-		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
 	}
 	task_ctx->valid_lbrs = i;
 	task_ctx->tos = tos;
@@ -667,7 +700,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 		if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO && need_info) {
 			u64 info;
 
-			rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, info);
+			info = rdlbr_info(lbr_idx);
 			mis = !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
 			pred = !mis;
 			in_tx = !!(info & LBR_INFO_IN_TX);
@@ -1313,6 +1346,7 @@ __init void intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl(void)
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos	 = MSR_LBR_TOS;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_from = MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_to   = MSR_LBR_NHM_TO;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_info = MSR_LBR_INFO_0;
 
 	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map  = hsw_lbr_sel_map;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index fd16ed3..5649838 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	/*
 	 * Intel LBR
 	 */
-	unsigned long	lbr_tos, lbr_from, lbr_to; /* MSR base regs       */
+	unsigned long	lbr_tos, lbr_from;	   /* MSR base regs       */
+	unsigned long	lbr_to, lbr_info;	   /* MSR base regs cont. */
 	int		lbr_nr;			   /* hardware stack size */
 	union {
 		u64		lbr_sel_mask;		   /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 18:19 [PATCH V2 00/23] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH V2 01/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-06-29 18:35   ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-26 18:19 ` [PATCH V2 02/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 03/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 04/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 05/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 06/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 07/23] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 08/23] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-06-30 15:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 15:36     ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-30 16:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 09/23] perf/x86/intel: Check Arch LBR MSRs kan.liang
2020-06-30 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 15:29     ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 10/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 11/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Unify the stored format of LBR information kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out intel_pmu_store_lbr kan.liang
2020-06-30 15:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 14/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-06-30 15:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 16:17     ` Liang, Kan
2020-06-30 16:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 15/23] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 16/23] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 17/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 18/23] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 19/23] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 20/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 21/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 22/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH V2 23/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1593195620-116988-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®