* Re: + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree [not found] <200701250354.l0P3spES005128@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> @ 2007-01-26 3:31 ` David Miller 2007-01-27 0:45 ` Herbert Xu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2007-01-26 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, akpm; +Cc: deweerdt, netdev, frederik.deweerdt, shemminger From: akpm@osdl.org Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:54:51 -0800 > Hi, > > The following code: > [...] > > Causes the following oops: > ... > [ 66.355188] [<c0396c74>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [ 66.355192] [<f8adaf03>] packet_sendmsg+0x147/0x201 [af_packet] > [ 66.355199] [<c030e1c5>] sock_sendmsg+0xf9/0x116 > [ 66.355204] [<c030eb54>] sys_sendto+0xbf/0xe0 > [ 66.355208] [<c030f494>] sys_socketcall+0x1aa/0x277 > [ 66.355212] [<c01041ea>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 > [ 66.355216] ======================= > [ 66.355218] Code: Bad EIP value. > [ 66.355223] EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:f6261d70 > > shaper_header() should check for shaper->dev not being NULL (ie. the > shaper was actually attached) as in the following patch. > This happens in mainline too (tested 2.6.19.2). > > Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Shaper is actually OK. None of these hardware header callbacks should be invoked if the device is down. Yet, this is what is accidently being allowed in the AF_PACKET socket layer. Shaper makes sure to fail ->open() if shaper->dev is NULL, in order to prevent this. But AF_PACKET does it's check of device state too late, after the dev->header() call. That's the bug. I'll fix it like this: diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c index 594c078..6dc01bd 100644 --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c @@ -359,6 +359,10 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, if (dev == NULL) goto out_unlock; + err = -ENETDOWN; + if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) + goto out_unlock; + /* * You may not queue a frame bigger than the mtu. This is the lowest level * raw protocol and you must do your own fragmentation at this level. @@ -407,10 +411,6 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, if (err) goto out_free; - err = -ENETDOWN; - if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) - goto out_free; - /* * Now send it */ @@ -738,6 +738,10 @@ static int packet_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW) reserve = dev->hard_header_len; + err = -ENETDOWN; + if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) + goto out_unlock; + err = -EMSGSIZE; if (len > dev->mtu+reserve) goto out_unlock; @@ -770,10 +774,6 @@ static int packet_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, skb->dev = dev; skb->priority = sk->sk_priority; - err = -ENETDOWN; - if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) - goto out_free; - /* * Now send it */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree 2007-01-26 3:31 ` + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree David Miller @ 2007-01-27 0:45 ` Herbert Xu 2007-01-27 1:01 ` Herbert Xu 2007-01-27 3:10 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Herbert Xu @ 2007-01-27 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, deweerdt, netdev, frederik.deweerdt, shemminger David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > Shaper is actually OK. None of these hardware header callbacks > should be invoked if the device is down. Yet, this is what is > accidently being allowed in the AF_PACKET socket layer. Hmm, what if the device goes down after the check? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree 2007-01-27 0:45 ` Herbert Xu @ 2007-01-27 1:01 ` Herbert Xu 2007-01-27 3:12 ` David Miller 2007-01-27 3:10 ` David Miller 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Herbert Xu @ 2007-01-27 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, deweerdt, netdev, frederik.deweerdt, shemminger On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:45:05AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > > Shaper is actually OK. None of these hardware header callbacks > > should be invoked if the device is down. Yet, this is what is > > accidently being allowed in the AF_PACKET socket layer. > > Hmm, what if the device goes down after the check? In fact, the shaper device doesn't even seem to take a ref count of the device it has attached to. So that device can go away at any time. What's more, there are drivers that can change hard_header at run-time (s390). Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree 2007-01-27 1:01 ` Herbert Xu @ 2007-01-27 3:12 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2007-01-27 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: herbert Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, deweerdt, netdev, frederik.deweerdt, shemminger From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:01:46 +1100 > In fact, the shaper device doesn't even seem to take a ref count of > the device it has attached to. So that device can go away at any time. > What's more, there are drivers that can change hard_header at run-time > (s390). Indeed, it needs to do refcounting or something here, at a minimum, this driver is so buggy and full of problems :-/ Thankfully it's marked OBSOLETE so we'll get rid of it eventually :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree 2007-01-27 0:45 ` Herbert Xu 2007-01-27 1:01 ` Herbert Xu @ 2007-01-27 3:10 ` David Miller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2007-01-27 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: herbert Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, deweerdt, netdev, frederik.deweerdt, shemminger From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:45:05 +1100 > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > > Shaper is actually OK. None of these hardware header callbacks > > should be invoked if the device is down. Yet, this is what is > > accidently being allowed in the AF_PACKET socket layer. > > Hmm, what if the device goes down after the check? For the shaper case it's OK, because once a shaper is associated it's ->dev never goes back to NULL. In general, yes it's a problem :-/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-27 3:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200701250354.l0P3spES005128@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2007-01-26 3:31 ` + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree David Miller
2007-01-27 0:45 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-27 1:01 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-27 3:12 ` David Miller
2007-01-27 3:10 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome