From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428153817.GF18776@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804270930.55647.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, April 26, 2008 2:55 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ok, this is the final chunk of the "big box" topic - the PCI changes.
> >
> > These are the largest, and while i tried to reduce their number it's
> > still 19 commits - but it's all around the same topic. The bulk of the
> > new code is in a single file. The tree can be pulled from:
> >
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86-bigbox-pci.
> >git for-linus
> >
> > this depends on the bootmem changes which are now upstream. These
> > changes too have been in linux-next for some time and the cross-arch
> > (build) success rate is high, as in:
> >
> > http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-cgi/index?run=89&tree=1
> >
> > all but the last few patches have been in x86.git for a longer time and
> > more than 95% of the changes are for arch/x86. (see the dates of the
> > patches. The "15 Feb 2008" ones are older than their timestamp - that's
> > when we imported those changes into a date-aware repository.)
> >
> > i booted up this tree 5 times on x86, mixed 64-bit/32-bit.
>
> Only did a quick scan, but the changes look nice so far. I'll take a
> closer look and give it a try locally tomorrow.
ok, great! Let us know if you experience any problems - and please give
us an Ack if it looks OK so that we can send the final pull request to
Linus :-)
> On an unrelated note, can you take a look at the "PCI MSI breaks when
> booting with nosmp" thread? I posted a patch there that
> unconditionally enables the local apic with nosmp/maxcpus=0 so that
> MSI will work correctly. The other option of course is to disable MSI
> when nosmp/maxcpus=0 and local apic enable code alone.
yeah - great fix - your patch has been put into x86.git a few minutes
after you posted the fix ;-) I think that's been a long-standing problem
(== was broken forever), i noticed it happen on a number of Intel SDV
boards myself in the past and initially suspected e1000 - it is the
first driver that throws a fit with non-working MSI interrupts.
I never managed to track it down (there was nothing to bisect to and far
enough in the past kernels simply stopped booting on that hardware) and
things like acpi=off regularly dont work on prototype boards anyway. I'm
glad you figured it out and it's on the way upstream.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-26 18:55 [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:05 ` Stefan Richter
2008-04-26 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 19:41 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 20:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:08 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem, #2 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 20:55 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem, #3 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 22:48 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Johannes Weiner
2008-04-27 23:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 0:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 0:40 ` [patch] mm: node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 1:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 19:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 19:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-30 10:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-30 16:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-30 17:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-30 20:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-29 14:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 10:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 0:33 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-26 19:54 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, boot protocol Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:39 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-26 21:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-26 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-26 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 23:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-27 11:21 ` Ian Campbell
2008-04-27 19:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-28 15:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:24 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes, GART Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 21:55 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 16:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-28 15:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-28 20:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-28 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 23:27 ` [PATCH] x86/pci: remove flag in pci_cfg_space_size_ext Yinghai Lu
2008-04-29 16:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-29 22:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 22:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-26 22:17 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes Andi Kleen
2008-04-27 3:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-27 8:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-27 8:32 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes II Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080428153817.GF18776@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yinghai.lu@sun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome