mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:38:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428153817.GF18776@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804270930.55647.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>


* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> On Saturday, April 26, 2008 2:55 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ok, this is the final chunk of the "big box" topic - the PCI changes.
> >
> > These are the largest, and while i tried to reduce their number it's
> > still 19 commits - but it's all around the same topic. The bulk of the
> > new code is in a single file. The tree can be pulled from:
> >
> >   
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86-bigbox-pci.
> >git for-linus
> >
> > this depends on the bootmem changes which are now upstream. These
> > changes too have been in linux-next for some time and the cross-arch
> > (build) success rate is high, as in:
> >
> >    http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-cgi/index?run=89&tree=1
> >
> > all but the last few patches have been in x86.git for a longer time and
> > more than 95% of the changes are for arch/x86. (see the dates of the
> > patches. The "15 Feb 2008" ones are older than their timestamp - that's
> > when we imported those changes into a date-aware repository.)
> >
> > i booted up this tree 5 times on x86, mixed 64-bit/32-bit.
> 
> Only did a quick scan, but the changes look nice so far.  I'll take a 
> closer look and give it a try locally tomorrow.

ok, great! Let us know if you experience any problems - and please give 
us an Ack if it looks OK so that we can send the final pull request to 
Linus :-)

> On an unrelated note, can you take a look at the "PCI MSI breaks when 
> booting with nosmp" thread?  I posted a patch there that 
> unconditionally enables the local apic with nosmp/maxcpus=0 so that 
> MSI will work correctly.  The other option of course is to disable MSI 
> when nosmp/maxcpus=0 and local apic enable code alone.

yeah - great fix - your patch has been put into x86.git a few minutes 
after you posted the fix ;-) I think that's been a long-standing problem 
(== was broken forever), i noticed it happen on a number of Intel SDV 
boards myself in the past and initially suspected e1000 - it is the 
first driver that throws a fit with non-working MSI interrupts.

I never managed to track it down (there was nothing to bisect to and far 
enough in the past kernels simply stopped booting on that hardware) and 
things like acpi=off regularly dont work on prototype boards anyway. I'm 
glad you figured it out and it's on the way upstream.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-28 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-26 18:55 [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:05 ` Stefan Richter
2008-04-26 19:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 19:41   ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:52     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 20:07       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:08       ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem, #2 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 20:55           ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem, #3 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 22:48     ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Johannes Weiner
2008-04-27 23:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28  0:19         ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28  0:40           ` [patch] mm: node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28  1:48             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:54               ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 19:11                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 19:55                   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-30 10:50                     ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-30 16:22                       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-30 17:52                         ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-30 20:30                           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:49             ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-29 14:25               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 10:52                 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28  0:33       ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:58         ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-26 19:54   ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, boot protocol Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:39     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-26 21:06       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-26 21:10         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-26 21:11         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 21:17           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 23:37       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-27 11:21     ` Ian Campbell
2008-04-27 19:29       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-28 15:27       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:24   ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes, GART Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 21:55   ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 16:30     ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-28 15:38       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-28 20:34     ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-28 22:53       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 23:27       ` [PATCH] x86/pci: remove flag in pci_cfg_space_size_ext Yinghai Lu
2008-04-29 16:14         ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-29 22:05           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 22:34             ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-26 22:17 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes Andi Kleen
2008-04-27  3:14   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-27  8:30     ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-27  8:32     ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes II Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080428153817.GF18776@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yinghai.lu@sun.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome