From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:12:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804261205490.2813@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080426185516.GA32364@elte.hu>
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So we need a bit of help wrt. how mergable this is, and what else is
> needed to make it mergable. These changes have been booted all across
> the x86 spectrum, small and large boxes alike, so i'd be seriously
> surprised if they caused any widespread breakage.
I'd like to see this sent as perhaps four independent pulls (where
"independent" doesn't necessarily mean that they don't depend on each
other and have some ordering, but is more of a "this is the bootup
changes" vs "these are bootmem-related" etc, if at all possible.
Quite frankly, from a review standpoint, very few people should need to
(or want to) review individual commits when there are 50 of them (they
might only care about the changes that 3 or 4 of them make, but they get
lost in the noise), but at the same time, if you have a single diffstat
like this:
45 files changed, 2071 insertions(+), 362 deletions(-)
then you're also going to have people not able to give good feedback.
In contrast, if you send out an email like this one, but that has the
combined diff of say 10 commits in one area, and the diff is a couple of
hundred lines of changes rather than almost 2,500 lines, then you'll
definitely get people who are able and willing to look at four chunks like
that.
IOW, they'd be big enough that people hopefully don't start nitpicking
about some *totally* uninteresting small detail, but small enough that
people can read it through without losing concentration about a quarter of
the way in.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-26 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-26 18:55 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:05 ` Stefan Richter
2008-04-26 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-04-26 19:41 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 20:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:08 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem, #2 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 20:55 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem, #3 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 22:48 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Johannes Weiner
2008-04-27 23:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 0:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 0:40 ` [patch] mm: node-setup agnostic free_bootmem() Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 1:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 19:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 19:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-30 10:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-30 16:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-30 17:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-30 20:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-29 14:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 10:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-28 0:33 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, bootmem/sparsemem Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 16:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-26 19:54 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, boot protocol Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:39 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-26 21:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-26 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-26 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-26 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 23:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-27 11:21 ` Ian Campbell
2008-04-27 19:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-28 15:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:24 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes, GART Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 20:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-26 21:55 ` [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 16:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-28 15:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 20:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-28 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-28 23:27 ` [PATCH] x86/pci: remove flag in pci_cfg_space_size_ext Yinghai Lu
2008-04-29 16:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-29 22:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 22:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-26 22:17 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes Andi Kleen
2008-04-27 3:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-27 8:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-27 8:32 ` [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes II Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0804261205490.2813@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yinghai.lu@sun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®