From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Ensure that cpumask set for pools created after boot
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 13:33:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170510173340.GF32165@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a776cff1-1d56-a59a-8336-589a9a2b9fb4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello,
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:48:17AM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
>
> On NUMA systems with dynamic processors, the content of the cpumask
> may change over time. As new processors are added via DLPAR operations,
> workqueues are created for them. This patch ensures that the pools
> created for new workqueues will be initialized with a cpumask before
> the first worker is created, attached, and woken up. If the mask is
> not set up, then the kernel will crash when 'wakeup_process' is unable
> to find a valid CPU to which to assign the new worker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index c74bf39..6091069 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3366,6 +3366,8 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
> pool->node = target_node;
>
> + cpumask_copy(pool->attrs->cpumask, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()));
What prevents a cpu getting added right here tho?
Maybe the right thing to do is protecting the whole thing with hotplug
readlock?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-10 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-10 16:48 Michael Bringmann
2017-05-10 17:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-05-15 15:48 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-16 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-23 19:44 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-23 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-23 20:09 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-23 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-24 16:30 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-24 23:39 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-25 15:03 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-25 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-25 15:30 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-06 16:18 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-06 18:09 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-12 14:47 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-12 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-12 17:10 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-12 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-13 20:04 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-13 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-28 21:15 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-28 21:24 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-26 15:25 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-26 19:16 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 17:04 ` Michael Bringmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170510173340.GF32165@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®