From: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Ensure that cpumask set for pools created after boot
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 10:30:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0723547-1383-efa2-a691-eb91ff0620c4@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170525150752.GF23493@htj.duckdns.org>
I will try that patch shortly. I also updated my patch to be conditional
on whether the pool's cpumask attribute was empty. You should have received
V2 of that patch by now.
As to your remark about 'proper subset of possible cpumask for the node',
would that not be the case when we are removing VPs?
On 05/25/2017 10:07 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:03:53AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> wq_update_unbound_numa() should have never called into
>> alloc_unbound_pwq() w/ empty node cpu mask. It should have fallen
>> back to the dfl_pwq. It looks like I just messed up the logic there
>> from the initial commit of the feature. Can you please see whether
>> the following fixes the problem?
>
> Can you please try the following instead. On the second thought, I
> don't think the current logic is wrong. If this fixes the issue,
> somehow your setup is having a situation where online cpumask for a
> node is a proper superset of possible cpumask for the node.
>
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index c74bf39ef764..4da5ff649ff8 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3559,13 +3559,13 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> * stable.
> *
> * Return: %true if the resulting @cpumask is different from @attrs->cpumask,
> - * %false if equal.
> + * %false if equal. On %false return, the content of @cpumask is undefined.
> */
> static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
> int cpu_going_down, cpumask_t *cpumask)
> {
> if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->no_numa)
> - goto use_dfl;
> + return false;
>
> /* does @node have any online CPUs @attrs wants? */
> cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask_of_node(node), attrs->cpumask);
> @@ -3573,15 +3573,13 @@ static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_going_down, cpumask);
>
> if (cpumask_empty(cpumask))
> - goto use_dfl;
> + return false;
>
> /* yeap, return possible CPUs in @node that @attrs wants */
> cpumask_and(cpumask, attrs->cpumask, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
> - return !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
>
> -use_dfl:
> - cpumask_copy(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
> - return false;
> + return !cpumask_empty(cpumask) &&
> + !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
> }
>
> /* install @pwq into @wq's numa_pwq_tbl[] for @node and return the old pwq */
>
>
--
Michael W. Bringmann
Linux Technology Center
IBM Corporation
Tie-Line 363-5196
External: (512) 286-5196
Cell: (512) 466-0650
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-25 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-10 16:48 Michael Bringmann
2017-05-10 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-15 15:48 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-16 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-23 19:44 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-23 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-23 20:09 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-23 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-24 16:30 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-24 23:39 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-25 15:03 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-25 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-25 15:30 ` Michael Bringmann [this message]
2017-06-06 16:18 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-06 18:09 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-12 14:47 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-12 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-12 17:10 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-12 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-13 20:04 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-13 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-28 21:15 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-28 21:24 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-26 15:25 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-26 19:16 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 17:04 ` Michael Bringmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0723547-1383-efa2-a691-eb91ff0620c4@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®