From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Ensure that cpumask set for pools created after boot
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 11:03:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170525150353.GE23493@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc40ae7f-8904-4e3b-0205-06c114a056b8@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello, Michael.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:39:49PM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> [ 321.310961] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 321.310997] WARNING: CPU: 184 PID: 13201 at kernel/workqueue.c:3375 alloc_unbound_pwq+0x5c0/0x5e0
> [ 321.311005] Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp dccp_diag dccp tcp_diag udp_diag inet_diag unix_diag af_packet_diag netlink_diag sg pseries_rng ghash_generic gf128mul xts vmx_crypto binfmt_misc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod ibmvscsi ibmveth scsi_transport_srp dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> [ 321.311097] CPU: 184 PID: 13201 Comm: cpuhp/184 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1.wi91275_debug_03.ppc64le+ #8
> [ 321.311106] task: c000000408961080 task.stack: c000000406394000
> [ 321.311113] NIP: c000000000116c80 LR: c000000000116c7c CTR: 0000000000000000
> [ 321.311121] REGS: c0000004063977b0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (4.12.0-rc1.wi91275_debug_03.ppc64le+)
> [ 321.311128] MSR: 8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>
> [ 321.311150] CR: 28000082 XER: 00000000
> [ 321.311159] CFAR: c000000000a2dc80 SOFTE: 1
> [ 321.311159] GPR00: c000000000116c7c c000000406397a30 c0000000013ae900 000000000000003b
> [ 321.311159] GPR04: c000000408961a38 0000000000000006 00000000a49e41e5 ffffffffa4a5a483
> [ 321.311159] GPR08: 00000000000062cc 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c000000408961a38
> [ 321.311159] GPR12: 0000000000000000 c00000000fb38c00 c00000000011e858 c00000040a902ac0
> [ 321.311159] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 321.311159] GPR20: c000000406394000 0000000000000002 c000000406394000 0000000000000000
> [ 321.311159] GPR24: c000000405075400 c000000404fc0000 0000000000000110 c0000000015a4c88
> [ 321.311159] GPR28: 0000000000000000 c0000004fe256000 c0000004fe256008 c0000004fe052800
> [ 321.311290] NIP [c000000000116c80] alloc_unbound_pwq+0x5c0/0x5e0
> [ 321.311298] LR [c000000000116c7c] alloc_unbound_pwq+0x5bc/0x5e0
> [ 321.311305] Call Trace:
> [ 321.311310] [c000000406397a30] [c000000000116c7c] alloc_unbound_pwq+0x5bc/0x5e0 (unreliable)
> [ 321.311323] [c000000406397ad0] [c000000000116e30] wq_update_unbound_numa+0x190/0x270
> [ 321.311334] [c000000406397b60] [c000000000118eb0] workqueue_offline_cpu+0xe0/0x130
> [ 321.311345] [c000000406397bf0] [c0000000000e9f20] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x240/0xcd0
> [ 321.311355] [c000000406397cb0] [c0000000000eab28] cpuhp_down_callbacks+0x78/0xf0
> [ 321.311365] [c000000406397d00] [c0000000000eae6c] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x18c/0x1a0
> [ 321.311376] [c000000406397d30] [c0000000001251cc] smpboot_thread_fn+0x2fc/0x3b0
> [ 321.311386] [c000000406397dc0] [c00000000011e9c0] kthread+0x170/0x1b0
> [ 321.311397] [c000000406397e30] [c00000000000b4f4] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x68
wq_update_unbound_numa() should have never called into
alloc_unbound_pwq() w/ empty node cpu mask. It should have fallen
back to the dfl_pwq. It looks like I just messed up the logic there
from the initial commit of the feature. Can you please see whether
the following fixes the problem?
Thanks.
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c74bf39ef764..e2c248d5223a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3559,29 +3559,21 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
* stable.
*
* Return: %true if the resulting @cpumask is different from @attrs->cpumask,
- * %false if equal.
+ * %false if equal. On %false return, the content of @cpumask is undefined.
*/
static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
int cpu_going_down, cpumask_t *cpumask)
{
if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->no_numa)
- goto use_dfl;
+ return false;
/* does @node have any online CPUs @attrs wants? */
cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask_of_node(node), attrs->cpumask);
if (cpu_going_down >= 0)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_going_down, cpumask);
- if (cpumask_empty(cpumask))
- goto use_dfl;
-
- /* yeap, return possible CPUs in @node that @attrs wants */
- cpumask_and(cpumask, attrs->cpumask, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
- return !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
-
-use_dfl:
- cpumask_copy(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
- return false;
+ return !cpumask_empty(cpumask) &&
+ !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
}
/* install @pwq into @wq's numa_pwq_tbl[] for @node and return the old pwq */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-25 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-10 16:48 Michael Bringmann
2017-05-10 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-15 15:48 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-16 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-23 19:44 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-23 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-23 20:09 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-23 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-24 16:30 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-24 23:39 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-05-25 15:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-05-25 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-25 15:30 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-06 16:18 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-06 18:09 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-12 14:47 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-12 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-12 17:10 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-12 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-13 20:04 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-13 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-28 21:15 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-06-28 21:24 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-26 15:25 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-26 19:16 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 17:04 ` Michael Bringmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170525150353.GE23493@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome