mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	David.Kaplan@amd.com, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	nik.borisov@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:44:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814121148.842775684@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814114426.057251214@infradead.org>

Use the existing configurable return thunk. There is absolute no
justification for having created this __x86_return_thunk alternative.

To clarify, the whole thing looks like:

Zen3/4 does:

  srso_alias_untrain_ret:
	  nop2
	  lfence
	  jmp srso_alias_return_thunk
	  int3

  srso_alias_safe_ret: // aliasses srso_alias_untrain_ret just so
	  add $8, %rsp
	  ret
	  int3

  srso_alias_return_thunk:
	  call srso_alias_safe_ret
	  ud2

While Zen1/2 does:

  srso_untrain_ret:
	  movabs $foo, %rax
	  lfence
	  call srso_safe_ret           (jmp srso_return_thunk ?)
	  int3

  srso_safe_ret: // embedded in movabs instruction
	  add $8,%rsp
          ret
          int3

  srso_return_thunk:
	  call srso_safe_ret
	  ud2

While retbleed does:

  zen_untrain_ret:
	  test $0xcc, %bl
	  lfence
	  jmp zen_return_thunk
          int3

  zen_return_thunk: // embedded in the test instruction
	  ret
          int3

Where Zen1/2 flush the BTB entry using the instruction decoder trick
(test,movabs) Zen3/4 use instruction aliasing. SRSO adds RSB (RAP in
AMD speak) stuffing to force speculation into a trap an cause a
mis-predict.

Pick one of three options at boot (evey function can only ever return
once).

Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h |    6 ++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c           |    8 ++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S        |    2 -
 arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S             |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c      |    2 -
 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -342,9 +342,15 @@ extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_
 extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_jump_thunk_array[];
 
 extern void __x86_return_thunk(void);
+
+extern void zen_return_thunk(void);
+extern void srso_return_thunk(void);
+extern void srso_alias_return_thunk(void);
+
 extern void zen_untrain_ret(void);
 extern void srso_untrain_ret(void);
 extern void srso_untrain_ret_alias(void);
+
 extern void entry_ibpb(void);
 
 extern void (*x86_return_thunk)(void);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitig
 	case RETBLEED_MITIGATION_UNRET:
 		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
 		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
+		x86_return_thunk = zen_return_thunk;
 
 		if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
 		    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
@@ -2451,10 +2452,13 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigatio
 			 */
 			setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
 
-			if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19)
+			if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19) {
 				setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS);
-			else
+				x86_return_thunk = srso_alias_return_thunk;
+			} else {
 				setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO);
+				x86_return_thunk = srso_return_thunk;
+			}
 			srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET;
 		} else {
 			pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with CPU_SRSO.\n");
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RETHUNK
-. = ASSERT((__ret & 0x3f) == 0, "__ret not cacheline-aligned");
+. = ASSERT((zen_return_thunk & 0x3f) == 0, "zen_return_thunk not cacheline-aligned");
 . = ASSERT((srso_safe_ret & 0x3f) == 0, "srso_safe_ret not cacheline-aligned");
 #endif
 
--- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
@@ -151,22 +151,20 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__x86_indirect_jump_thunk_a
 	.section .text..__x86.rethunk_untrain
 
 SYM_START(srso_untrain_ret_alias, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
+	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
 	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
 	ASM_NOP2
 	lfence
-	jmp __x86_return_thunk
+	jmp srso_alias_return_thunk
 SYM_FUNC_END(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
 __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
 
 	.section .text..__x86.rethunk_safe
 #endif
 
-/* Needs a definition for the __x86_return_thunk alternative below. */
 SYM_START(srso_safe_ret_alias, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SRSO
 	lea 8(%_ASM_SP), %_ASM_SP
 	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
-#endif
 	ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
 	ret
 	int3
@@ -174,9 +172,16 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
 
 	.section .text..__x86.return_thunk
 
+SYM_CODE_START(srso_alias_return_thunk)
+	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
+	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
+	call srso_safe_ret_alias
+	ud2
+SYM_CODE_END(srso_alias_return_thunk)
+
 /*
  * Safety details here pertain to the AMD Zen{1,2} microarchitecture:
- * 1) The RET at __x86_return_thunk must be on a 64 byte boundary, for
+ * 1) The RET at zen_return_thunk must be on a 64 byte boundary, for
  *    alignment within the BTB.
  * 2) The instruction at zen_untrain_ret must contain, and not
  *    end with, the 0xc3 byte of the RET.
@@ -184,7 +189,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
  *    from re-poisioning the BTB prediction.
  */
 	.align 64
-	.skip 64 - (__ret - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
+	.skip 64 - (zen_return_thunk - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
 SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
 	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
 	/*
@@ -192,16 +197,16 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
 	 *
 	 *   TEST $0xcc, %bl
 	 *   LFENCE
-	 *   JMP __x86_return_thunk
+	 *   JMP zen_return_thunk
 	 *
 	 * Executing the TEST instruction has a side effect of evicting any BTB
 	 * prediction (potentially attacker controlled) attached to the RET, as
-	 * __x86_return_thunk + 1 isn't an instruction boundary at the moment.
+	 * zen_return_thunk + 1 isn't an instruction boundary at the moment.
 	 */
 	.byte	0xf6
 
 	/*
-	 * As executed from __x86_return_thunk, this is a plain RET.
+	 * As executed from zen_return_thunk, this is a plain RET.
 	 *
 	 * As part of the TEST above, RET is the ModRM byte, and INT3 the imm8.
 	 *
@@ -213,13 +218,13 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
 	 * With SMT enabled and STIBP active, a sibling thread cannot poison
 	 * RET's prediction to a type of its choice, but can evict the
 	 * prediction due to competitive sharing. If the prediction is
-	 * evicted, __x86_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
+	 * evicted, zen_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
 	 * which will be contained safely by the INT3.
 	 */
-SYM_INNER_LABEL(__ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
+SYM_INNER_LABEL(zen_return_thunk, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
 	ret
 	int3
-SYM_CODE_END(__ret)
+SYM_CODE_END(zen_return_thunk)
 
 	/*
 	 * Ensure the TEST decoding / BTB invalidation is complete.
@@ -230,7 +235,7 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__ret)
 	 * Jump back and execute the RET in the middle of the TEST instruction.
 	 * INT3 is for SLS protection.
 	 */
-	jmp __ret
+	jmp zen_return_thunk
 	int3
 SYM_FUNC_END(zen_untrain_ret)
 __EXPORT_THUNK(zen_untrain_ret)
@@ -256,6 +261,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(srso_safe_ret, SYM_L_GLO
 	ret
 	int3
 	int3
+	/* end of movabs */
 	lfence
 	call srso_safe_ret
 	ud2
@@ -263,12 +269,19 @@ SYM_CODE_END(srso_safe_ret)
 SYM_FUNC_END(srso_untrain_ret)
 __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret)
 
-SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
+SYM_CODE_START(srso_return_thunk)
 	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
 	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
-	ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp __ret", "call srso_safe_ret", X86_FEATURE_SRSO, \
-			"call srso_safe_ret_alias", X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS
+	call srso_safe_ret
 	ud2
+SYM_CODE_END(srso_return_thunk)
+
+SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
+	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
+	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
+	ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
+	ret
+	int3
 SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__x86_return_thunk)
 
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -829,6 +829,6 @@ bool arch_is_rethunk(struct symbol *sym)
 
 bool arch_is_embedded_insn(struct symbol *sym)
 {
-	return !strcmp(sym->name, "__ret") ||
+	return !strcmp(sym->name, "zen_return_thunk") ||
 	       !strcmp(sym->name, "srso_safe_ret");
 }



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14 11:44 [PATCH v2 00/11] Fix up SRSO stuff Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] x86/cpu: Fixup __x86_return_thunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/cpu: Fix __x86_return_thunk symbol type tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] x86/cpu: Fix up srso_safe_ret() and __x86_return_thunk() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 12:54   ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 11:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 20:31       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-16 22:08         ` [PATCH] objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 22:22           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-17  8:39       ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/alternative: Make custom return thunk unconditional Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-08-14 13:02   ` [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 17:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-15 21:29   ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-15 22:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 14:52         ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 15:08           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 18:58     ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 19:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 19:30         ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 19:42           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 19:57             ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed methods Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 19:41   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/cpu: Rename srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1 Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/alternatives: Simplify ALTERNATIVE_n() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-15 20:49   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-15 22:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07  8:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-07 11:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 11:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 11:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 15:06       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-07 15:30         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-09  7:50           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-09  9:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-09  9:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-10 14:42               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-12  9:27                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12  9:44                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13  4:37                     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-13  8:46                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13 14:38                         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-13 16:14                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15  7:46                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15  7:51                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15 12:05                               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-13  4:24                   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86/cpu: Use fancy alternatives to get rid of entry_untrain_ret() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Fix up SRSO stuff Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 19:51   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-14 19:57     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 20:01     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-14 20:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-15 14:26         ` [PATCH] x86/srso: Explain the untraining sequences a bit more Borislav Petkov
2023-08-15 15:41           ` Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230814121148.842775684@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®