mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David.Kaplan@amd.com, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	nik.borisov@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:29:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230815212931.GA3863294@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814121148.842775684@infradead.org>

Hi Peter,

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 01:44:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

<snip>

>  arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h |    6 ++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c           |    8 ++++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S        |    2 -
>  arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S             |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c      |    2 -
>  5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> @@ -342,9 +342,15 @@ extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_
>  extern retpoline_thunk_t __x86_indirect_jump_thunk_array[];
>  
>  extern void __x86_return_thunk(void);
> +
> +extern void zen_return_thunk(void);
> +extern void srso_return_thunk(void);
> +extern void srso_alias_return_thunk(void);
> +
>  extern void zen_untrain_ret(void);
>  extern void srso_untrain_ret(void);
>  extern void srso_untrain_ret_alias(void);
> +
>  extern void entry_ibpb(void);
>  
>  extern void (*x86_return_thunk)(void);
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitig
>  	case RETBLEED_MITIGATION_UNRET:
>  		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
>  		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_UNRET);
> +		x86_return_thunk = zen_return_thunk;
>  
>  		if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
>  		    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> @@ -2451,10 +2452,13 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigatio
>  			 */
>  			setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK);
>  
> -			if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19)
> +			if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x19) {
>  				setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS);
> -			else
> +				x86_return_thunk = srso_alias_return_thunk;
> +			} else {
>  				setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SRSO);
> +				x86_return_thunk = srso_return_thunk;
> +			}
>  			srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_SAFE_RET;
>  		} else {
>  			pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with CPU_SRSO.\n");
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_backing_store);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RETHUNK
> -. = ASSERT((__ret & 0x3f) == 0, "__ret not cacheline-aligned");
> +. = ASSERT((zen_return_thunk & 0x3f) == 0, "zen_return_thunk not cacheline-aligned");
>  . = ASSERT((srso_safe_ret & 0x3f) == 0, "srso_safe_ret not cacheline-aligned");
>  #endif
>  
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
> @@ -151,22 +151,20 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__x86_indirect_jump_thunk_a
>  	.section .text..__x86.rethunk_untrain
>  
>  SYM_START(srso_untrain_ret_alias, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
> +	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
>  	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
>  	ASM_NOP2
>  	lfence
> -	jmp __x86_return_thunk
> +	jmp srso_alias_return_thunk
>  SYM_FUNC_END(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
>  __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret_alias)
>  
>  	.section .text..__x86.rethunk_safe
>  #endif
>  
> -/* Needs a definition for the __x86_return_thunk alternative below. */
>  SYM_START(srso_safe_ret_alias, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SRSO
>  	lea 8(%_ASM_SP), %_ASM_SP
>  	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> -#endif
>  	ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
>  	ret
>  	int3
> @@ -174,9 +172,16 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
>  
>  	.section .text..__x86.return_thunk
>  
> +SYM_CODE_START(srso_alias_return_thunk)
> +	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> +	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> +	call srso_safe_ret_alias
> +	ud2
> +SYM_CODE_END(srso_alias_return_thunk)
> +
>  /*
>   * Safety details here pertain to the AMD Zen{1,2} microarchitecture:
> - * 1) The RET at __x86_return_thunk must be on a 64 byte boundary, for
> + * 1) The RET at zen_return_thunk must be on a 64 byte boundary, for
>   *    alignment within the BTB.
>   * 2) The instruction at zen_untrain_ret must contain, and not
>   *    end with, the 0xc3 byte of the RET.
> @@ -184,7 +189,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(srso_safe_ret_alias)
>   *    from re-poisioning the BTB prediction.
>   */
>  	.align 64
> -	.skip 64 - (__ret - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
> +	.skip 64 - (zen_return_thunk - zen_untrain_ret), 0xcc
>  SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_NONE)
>  	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
>  	/*
> @@ -192,16 +197,16 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
>  	 *
>  	 *   TEST $0xcc, %bl
>  	 *   LFENCE
> -	 *   JMP __x86_return_thunk
> +	 *   JMP zen_return_thunk
>  	 *
>  	 * Executing the TEST instruction has a side effect of evicting any BTB
>  	 * prediction (potentially attacker controlled) attached to the RET, as
> -	 * __x86_return_thunk + 1 isn't an instruction boundary at the moment.
> +	 * zen_return_thunk + 1 isn't an instruction boundary at the moment.
>  	 */
>  	.byte	0xf6
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * As executed from __x86_return_thunk, this is a plain RET.
> +	 * As executed from zen_return_thunk, this is a plain RET.
>  	 *
>  	 * As part of the TEST above, RET is the ModRM byte, and INT3 the imm8.
>  	 *
> @@ -213,13 +218,13 @@ SYM_START(zen_untrain_ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL,
>  	 * With SMT enabled and STIBP active, a sibling thread cannot poison
>  	 * RET's prediction to a type of its choice, but can evict the
>  	 * prediction due to competitive sharing. If the prediction is
> -	 * evicted, __x86_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
> +	 * evicted, zen_return_thunk will suffer Straight Line Speculation
>  	 * which will be contained safely by the INT3.
>  	 */
> -SYM_INNER_LABEL(__ret, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> +SYM_INNER_LABEL(zen_return_thunk, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>  	ret
>  	int3
> -SYM_CODE_END(__ret)
> +SYM_CODE_END(zen_return_thunk)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure the TEST decoding / BTB invalidation is complete.
> @@ -230,7 +235,7 @@ SYM_CODE_END(__ret)
>  	 * Jump back and execute the RET in the middle of the TEST instruction.
>  	 * INT3 is for SLS protection.
>  	 */
> -	jmp __ret
> +	jmp zen_return_thunk
>  	int3
>  SYM_FUNC_END(zen_untrain_ret)
>  __EXPORT_THUNK(zen_untrain_ret)
> @@ -256,6 +261,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(srso_safe_ret, SYM_L_GLO
>  	ret
>  	int3
>  	int3
> +	/* end of movabs */
>  	lfence
>  	call srso_safe_ret
>  	ud2
> @@ -263,12 +269,19 @@ SYM_CODE_END(srso_safe_ret)
>  SYM_FUNC_END(srso_untrain_ret)
>  __EXPORT_THUNK(srso_untrain_ret)
>  
> -SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
> +SYM_CODE_START(srso_return_thunk)
>  	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
>  	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> -	ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp __ret", "call srso_safe_ret", X86_FEATURE_SRSO, \
> -			"call srso_safe_ret_alias", X86_FEATURE_SRSO_ALIAS
> +	call srso_safe_ret
>  	ud2
> +SYM_CODE_END(srso_return_thunk)
> +
> +SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
> +	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> +	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> +	ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
> +	ret
> +	int3
>  SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__x86_return_thunk)
>  
> --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,6 @@ bool arch_is_rethunk(struct symbol *sym)
>  
>  bool arch_is_embedded_insn(struct symbol *sym)
>  {
> -	return !strcmp(sym->name, "__ret") ||
> +	return !strcmp(sym->name, "zen_return_thunk") ||
>  	       !strcmp(sym->name, "srso_safe_ret");
>  }
> 
> 

I applied this change on top of -tip master and linux-next, where it
appears to break i386_defconfig (I see this error in other
configurations too but defconfig is obviously a simple target) with both
GCC and LLVM:

  i386-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o: in function `cpu_select_mitigations':
  bugs.c:(.init.text+0xe61): undefined reference to `zen_return_thunk'
  i386-linux-ld: bugs.c:(.init.text+0xe66): undefined reference to `x86_return_thunk'

  ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: x86_return_thunk
  >>> referenced by bugs.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o:(retbleed_select_mitigation) in archive vmlinux.a

  ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: zen_return_thunk
  >>> referenced by bugs.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o:(retbleed_select_mitigation) in archive vmlinux.a

It is still present at the head of the series, just with the function
rename.

  i386-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o: in function `cpu_select_mitigations':
  bugs.c:(.init.text+0xe61): undefined reference to `retbleed_return_thunk'
  i386-linux-ld: bugs.c:(.init.text+0xe66): undefined reference to `x86_return_thunk'

  ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: x86_return_thunk
  >>> referenced by bugs.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o:(retbleed_select_mitigation) in archive vmlinux.a

  ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: retbleed_return_thunk
  >>> referenced by bugs.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o:(retbleed_select_mitigation) in archive vmlinux.a

This configuration does have

  # CONFIG_RETHUNK is not set

but turning it on does not resolve the x86_return_thunk error...

  i386-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/static_call.o: in function `__static_call_transform':
  static_call.c:(.ref.text+0x4a): undefined reference to `x86_return_thunk'
  i386-linux-ld: static_call.c:(.ref.text+0x137): undefined reference to `x86_return_thunk'
  i386-linux-ld: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o: in function `cpu_select_mitigations':
  bugs.c:(.init.text+0xef2): undefined reference to `x86_return_thunk'

  ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: x86_return_thunk
  >>> referenced by static_call.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/static_call.o:(__static_call_transform) in archive vmlinux.a
  >>> referenced by static_call.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/static_call.o:(__static_call_transform) in archive vmlinux.a
  >>> referenced by bugs.c
  >>>               arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.o:(retbleed_select_mitigation) in archive vmlinux.a

I'd keep digging but I am running out of time for the day, hence just
the report rather than a fix.

Cheers,
Nathan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-15 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14 11:44 [PATCH v2 00/11] Fix up SRSO stuff Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] x86/cpu: Fixup __x86_return_thunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/cpu: Fix __x86_return_thunk symbol type tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] x86/cpu: Fix up srso_safe_ret() and __x86_return_thunk() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 12:54   ` Andrew.Cooper3
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 11:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 20:31       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-16 22:08         ` [PATCH] objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 22:22           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-17  8:39       ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/alternative: Make custom return thunk unconditional Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 13:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 17:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-15 21:29   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-08-15 22:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:38       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 14:52         ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 15:08           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 18:58     ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 19:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 19:30         ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 19:42           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 19:57             ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed methods Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 19:41   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/cpu: Rename srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1 Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16  7:55   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-16 21:20   ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/alternatives: Simplify ALTERNATIVE_n() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-15 20:49   ` Nikolay Borisov
2023-08-15 22:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07  8:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-07 11:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 11:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 11:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-07 15:06       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-07 15:30         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-09  7:50           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-09  9:25             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-09  9:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-10 14:42               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-12  9:27                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12  9:44                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13  4:37                     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-13  8:46                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13 14:38                         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-13 16:14                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15  7:46                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15  7:51                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15 12:05                               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-09-13  4:24                   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86/cpu: Use fancy alternatives to get rid of entry_untrain_ret() Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-14 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] Fix up SRSO stuff Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 19:51   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-14 19:57     ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-14 20:01     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-08-14 20:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-08-15 14:26         ` [PATCH] x86/srso: Explain the untraining sequences a bit more Borislav Petkov
2023-08-15 15:41           ` Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230815212931.GA3863294@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®