mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 19/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x4)
Date: Tue,  6 May 2025 07:04:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250506050437.10264-20-darwi@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506050437.10264-1-darwi@linutronix.de>

Refactor the Intel CPUID(0x4) cacheinfo logic to use scanned CPUID access
instead of issuing direct CPUID queries.

Since scanned CPUID access requires a cpuinfo_x86 reference, propagate it
down from <linux/cacheinfo.h>'s populate_cache_leaves() to all the
relevant functions.

Use the scanned CPUID access macro:

    cpudata_cpuid_nr_entries(c, 0x4)

to determine the number of Intel CPUID(0x4) cache leaves instead of
calling find_num_cache_leaves(), which issues direct CPUID queries.

Given that find_num_cache_leaves() is no longer needed for Intel code
paths, make it AMD-specific.  Rename it to amd_find_num_cache_leaves()
and remove its Intel CPUID(0x4) logic.  Adjust AMD paths accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index 665f3b187964..9de75c8b76ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -252,38 +252,35 @@ static int amd_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4)
 	return cpuid4_info_fill_done(id4, eax, ebx, ecx);
 }
 
-static int intel_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4)
+static int intel_fill_cpuid4_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4)
 {
-	union _cpuid4_leaf_eax eax;
-	union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx;
-	union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx ecx;
-	u32 ignored;
+	const struct cpuid_regs *regs = cpudata_cpuid_index_regs(c, 0x4, index);
 
-	cpuid_count(4, index, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx.full, &ignored);
-
-	return cpuid4_info_fill_done(id4, eax, ebx, ecx);
+	return cpuid4_info_fill_done(id4,
+				     (union _cpuid4_leaf_eax)(regs->eax),
+				     (union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx)(regs->ebx),
+				     (union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx)(regs->ecx));
 }
 
-static int fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4)
+static int fill_cpuid4_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4)
 {
 	u8 cpu_vendor = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
 
 	return (cpu_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || cpu_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON) ?
 		amd_fill_cpuid4_info(index, id4) :
-		intel_fill_cpuid4_info(index, id4);
+		intel_fill_cpuid4_info(c, index, id4);
 }
 
-static int find_num_cache_leaves(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+static int amd_find_num_cache_leaves(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, op;
+	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 	union _cpuid4_leaf_eax cache_eax;
 	int i = -1;
 
-	/* Do a CPUID(op) loop to calculate num_cache_leaves */
-	op = (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON) ? 0x8000001d : 4;
+	/* Do a CPUID(0x8000001d) loop to calculate num_cache_leaves */
 	do {
 		++i;
-		cpuid_count(op, i, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+		cpuid_count(0x8000001d, i, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 		cache_eax.full = eax;
 	} while (cache_eax.split.type != CTYPE_NULL);
 	return i;
@@ -313,7 +310,7 @@ void cacheinfo_amd_init_llc_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u16 die_id)
 		 * of threads sharing the L3 cache.
 		 */
 		u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx, num_sharing_cache = 0;
-		u32 llc_index = find_num_cache_leaves(c) - 1;
+		u32 llc_index = amd_find_num_cache_leaves(c) - 1;
 
 		cpuid_count(0x8000001d, llc_index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
 		if (eax)
@@ -344,7 +341,7 @@ void init_amd_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(c->cpu_index);
 
 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT))
-		ci->num_leaves = find_num_cache_leaves(c);
+		ci->num_leaves = amd_find_num_cache_leaves(c);
 	else if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000006)
 		ci->num_leaves = (cpuid_edx(0x80000006) & 0xf000) ? 4 : 3;
 }
@@ -353,7 +350,7 @@ void init_hygon_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(c->cpu_index);
 
-	ci->num_leaves = find_num_cache_leaves(c);
+	ci->num_leaves = amd_find_num_cache_leaves(c);
 }
 
 static void intel_cacheinfo_done(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int l3,
@@ -425,7 +422,7 @@ static bool intel_cacheinfo_0x4(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * that the number of leaves has been previously initialized.
 	 */
 	if (!ci->num_leaves)
-		ci->num_leaves = find_num_cache_leaves(c);
+		ci->num_leaves = cpudata_cpuid_nr_entries(c, 0x4);
 
 	if (!ci->num_leaves)
 		return false;
@@ -434,7 +431,7 @@ static bool intel_cacheinfo_0x4(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		struct _cpuid4_info id4 = {};
 		int ret;
 
-		ret = intel_fill_cpuid4_info(i, &id4);
+		ret = intel_fill_cpuid4_info(c, i, &id4);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			continue;
 
@@ -618,13 +615,14 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
 	struct cacheinfo *ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
 	u8 cpu_vendor = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor;
 	struct amd_northbridge *nb = NULL;
 	struct _cpuid4_info id4 = {};
 	int idx, ret;
 
 	for (idx = 0; idx < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; idx++) {
-		ret = fill_cpuid4_info(idx, &id4);
+		ret = fill_cpuid4_info(c, idx, &id4);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-06  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06  5:04 [PATCH v1 00/26] x86: Introduce centralized CPUID model Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 01/26] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.4 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  8:06   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 02/26] x86/cpu: Sanitize CPUID(0x80000000) output Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  8:15   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-07  8:50   ` [PATCH v1 02/26] " Andrew Cooper
2025-05-08 20:40     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-08 20:58       ` Andrew Cooper
2025-05-08 22:37         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-09  9:23     ` Ahmed S. Darwish (dev)
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 03/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce <asm/cpuid/leaves.h> Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 04/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce centralized CPUID data Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-14  4:18   ` Sohil Mehta
2025-05-15 21:23     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-15 22:12       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 05/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce CPUID scanner Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 06/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x80000000) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 07/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce debugfs 'x86/scanned_cpuid/[0-ncpus]' Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-14  2:56   ` Sohil Mehta
2025-05-15 21:04     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 08/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce external CPUID table accessors Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 09/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x0) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 10/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x80000001) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 11/26] x86/lib: Add CPUID(0x1) CPU family and model calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 12/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x1) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  8:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07  7:36     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 13/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  8:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06  8:47     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 10:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 14/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce scanned CPUID(0x2) API Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 15/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 16/26] x86/cacheinfo: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 17/26] x86/cpuid: Remove direct CPUID(0x2) query API Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  8:59   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07  9:15     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 18/26] x86/cpuid: Scan deterministic cache params CPUID leaves Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-05-06  8:10   ` [PATCH v1 19/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x4) Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06  8:50     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 20/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x8000001d) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 21/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 22/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use auto-generated data types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 23/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 24/26] x86/cpuid: scanner: Add CPUID table rescan support Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 25/26] x86/cpu: Rescan CPUID table after PSN disable Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  5:04 ` [PATCH v1 26/26] x86/cpu: Rescan CPUID table after unlocking the full CPUID range Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  8:23 ` [PATCH v1 00/26] x86: Introduce centralized CPUID model Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06  8:48   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06  9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07  8:35   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-07  8:45     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-07  9:32   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-09  9:28     ` Ahmed S. Darwish (dev)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250506050437.10264-20-darwi@linutronix.de \
    --to=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®