From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce debugfs 'x86/scanned_cpuid/[0-ncpus]'
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:56:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e9286b1-6d76-4f30-97bd-8fcc3ca8f211@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506050437.10264-8-darwi@linutronix.de>
On 5/5/2025 10:04 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Introduce the debugfs files 'x86/scanned_cpuid/[0-ncpus]' to dump the
> scanned CPUID table for each CPU.
>
I tried out the patches. The debugfs hierarchy mentioned here doesn't
match the code.
The code actually builds:
x86/scanned_cpuid/cpus/[0-ncpus].
Can we simplify it to below? The "scanned_" part seems unnecessary.
x86/cpuid/[0-ncpus]
I would also suggest slight changes to the formatting to make it easier
to read.
1) Indent for the printed register values.
2) Move the * to the front of the value to make it more prominent.
Current
-------
Leaf 0x00000001, subleaf 0:
cached: EAX=0x000306e4 EBX=0x00200800 ECX=0x77bee3ff* EDX=0xbfebfbff
actual: EAX=0x000306e4 EBX=0x00200800 ECX=0x7fbee3ff EDX=0xbfebfbff
Leaf 0x00000002, subleaf 0:
cached: EAX=0x76036301 EBX=0x00f0b2ff ECX=0x00000000 EDX=0x00ca0000
actual: EAX=0x76036301 EBX=0x00f0b2ff ECX=0x00000000 EDX=0x00ca0000
Leaf 0x00000004, subleaf 0:
cached: EAX=0x3c004121 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
actual: EAX=0x3c004121 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
Leaf 0x00000004, subleaf 1:
cached: EAX=0x3c004122 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
actual: EAX=0x3c004122 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
Suggested
---------
Leaf 0x00000001, subleaf 0:
cached: EAX=0x000306e4 EBX=0x00200800 *ECX=0x77bee3ff EDX=0xbfebfbff
actual: EAX=0x000306e4 EBX=0x00200800 ECX=0x7fbee3ff EDX=0xbfebfbff
Leaf 0x00000002, subleaf 0:
cached: EAX=0x76036301 EBX=0x00f0b2ff ECX=0x00000000 EDX=0x00ca0000
actual: EAX=0x76036301 EBX=0x00f0b2ff ECX=0x00000000 EDX=0x00ca0000
Leaf 0x00000004, subleaf 0:
cached: EAX=0x3c004121 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
actual: EAX=0x3c004121 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
Leaf 0x00000004, subleaf 1:
cached: EAX=0x3c004122 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
actual: EAX=0x3c004122 EBX=0x01c0003f ECX=0x0000003f EDX=0x00000000
> While dumping the tables, for each cached CPUID leaf/subleaf entry, run
> the corresponding CPUID instruction on the target CPU. Compare the live
> hardware output with the cached register values. If a cached register
> differs, mark its cached value output entry with an asterisk.
>
> This should help with tricky bug reports in the future, if/when the
> scanned CPUID tables get (unexpectedly) out of sync with actual hardware
> state. It also simplifies the development and testing of adding new
> CPUID leaves and custom read functions to the CPUID scanner.
>
> Note, add an extern 'cpuid_common_scan_entries[]' declaration to the
> "cpuid_scanner.h" internal header to allow the debugfs code to access the
> CPUID scan entries directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid_debugfs.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid_scanner.c | 6 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid_scanner.h | 3 +
> 4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid_debugfs.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 994539fd0e17..eb9cd1dee58e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST) += vmware.o hypervisor.o mshyperv.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ACRN_GUEST) += acrn.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += debugfs.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += cpuid_debugfs.o
>
How about reusing the same line since the config option is the same?
> obj-$(CONFIG_X86_BUS_LOCK_DETECT) += bus_lock.o
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 5:04 [PATCH v1 00/26] x86: Introduce centralized CPUID model Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 01/26] tools/x86/kcpuid: Update bitfields to x86-cpuid-db v2.4 Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:06 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 02/26] x86/cpu: Sanitize CPUID(0x80000000) output Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:15 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-07 8:50 ` [PATCH v1 02/26] " Andrew Cooper
2025-05-08 20:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-08 20:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-05-08 22:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-09 9:23 ` Ahmed S. Darwish (dev)
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 03/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce <asm/cpuid/leaves.h> Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 04/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce centralized CPUID data Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-14 4:18 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-05-15 21:23 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-15 22:12 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 05/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce CPUID scanner Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 06/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x80000000) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 07/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce debugfs 'x86/scanned_cpuid/[0-ncpus]' Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-14 2:56 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-05-15 21:04 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 08/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce external CPUID table accessors Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 09/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x0) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 10/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x80000001) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 11/26] x86/lib: Add CPUID(0x1) CPU family and model calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 12/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x1) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07 7:36 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 13/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06 8:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 14/26] x86/cpuid: Introduce scanned CPUID(0x2) API Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 15/26] x86/cpu: Use scanned CPUID(0x2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 16/26] x86/cacheinfo: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 17/26] x86/cpuid: Remove direct CPUID(0x2) query API Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07 9:15 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 18/26] x86/cpuid: Scan deterministic cache params CPUID leaves Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 19/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x4) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06 8:50 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 20/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x8000001d) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 21/26] x86/cpuid: Scan CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 22/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use auto-generated data types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 23/26] x86/cacheinfo: Use scanned CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 24/26] x86/cpuid: scanner: Add CPUID table rescan support Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 25/26] x86/cpu: Rescan CPUID table after PSN disable Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 5:04 ` [PATCH v1 26/26] x86/cpu: Rescan CPUID table after unlocking the full CPUID range Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 8:23 ` [PATCH v1 00/26] x86: Introduce centralized CPUID model Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06 8:48 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-06 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-07 8:35 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-07 8:45 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-07 9:32 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-05-09 9:28 ` Ahmed S. Darwish (dev)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e9286b1-6d76-4f30-97bd-8fcc3ca8f211@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®