mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	x86@kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	reinette.chatre@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
	nik.borisov@suse.com, sagis@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control wbinvd during kexec
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 14:50:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250628125001.GDaF_k-e2KTo4QlKjl@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b963fcd60abe26c7ec5dc20b42f1a2ebbcc72397.1750934177.git.kai.huang@intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:48:47PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:

...

> Doing WBINVD in stop_this_cpu() could potentially increase the chance to
> trigger the above "race" despite it's still rare to happen.

Oh the amount of text... 

Please run it and all your comments through AI to simplify formulations etc.
It is a lot to read.

> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h         |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h     |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c            | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c   | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c            | 16 +++-------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S | 15 +++++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> index f2ad77929d6e..d7e93522b93d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ relocate_kernel_fn(unsigned long indirection_page,
>  		   unsigned long pa_control_page,
>  		   unsigned long start_address,
>  		   unsigned int preserve_context,
> -		   unsigned int host_mem_enc_active);
> +		   unsigned int cache_incoherent);

So preserve_context and cache_incoherent are both a *single* bit of
information. And we use two u32s for that?!?!

How about flags please?

>  #endif
>  extern relocate_kernel_fn relocate_kernel;
>  #define ARCH_HAS_KIMAGE_ARCH
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index bde58f6510ac..a24c7805acdb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dummy);
>  void microcode_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *prev_info);
>  void store_cpu_caps(struct cpuinfo_x86 *info);
>  

So much text above - not a single comment here explaining what this var is
for.

> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, cache_state_incoherent);
> +
>  enum l1tf_mitigations {
>  	L1TF_MITIGATION_OFF,
>  	L1TF_MITIGATION_AUTO,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index f18f540db58c..4c7fde344216 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -503,6 +503,22 @@ static void early_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
>  	u64 msr;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Mark using wbinvd is needed during kexec on processors that

For all text: write insns in caps pls - WBINVD.

> +	 * support SME. This provides support for performing a successful
> +	 * kexec when going from SME inactive to SME active (or vice-versa).
> +	 *
> +	 * The cache must be cleared so that if there are entries with the
> +	 * same physical address, both with and without the encryption bit,
> +	 * they don't race each other when flushed and potentially end up
> +	 * with the wrong entry being committed to memory.
> +	 *
> +	 * Test the CPUID bit directly because the machine might've cleared
> +	 * X86_FEATURE_SME due to cmdline options.

Where?

That same function does the clearing later...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-28 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26 10:48 [PATCH v3 0/6] TDX host: kexec/kdump support Kai Huang
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control wbinvd during kexec Kai Huang
2025-06-26 17:59   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 18:42     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27  0:30       ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-30  7:09         ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-27  0:37     ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-27  0:39       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27  1:06         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-27 15:08   ` Tom Lendacky
2025-06-30 11:35     ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-28 12:50   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2025-06-28 17:04     ` Tom Lendacky
2025-06-30 11:34       ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-30 11:34     ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-01 12:12       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-07-02  3:06         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/virt/tdx: Mark memory cache state incoherent when making SEAMCALL Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:37   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 23:36     ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-27  0:52       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27  1:47         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/kexec: Disable kexec/kdump on platforms with TDX partial write erratum Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:49   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-07-01  5:37   ` Binbin Wu
2025-07-02  3:12     ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-02  8:25   ` Chao Gao
2025-07-02  8:43     ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-02 22:16       ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-07-02 23:57         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/virt/tdx: Remove the !KEXEC_CORE dependency Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:49   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/virt/tdx: Update the kexec section in the TDX documentation Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:51   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD upon reboot notifier Kai Huang
2025-06-27  0:01   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27  1:00     ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-01  6:09   ` Binbin Wu
2025-07-02  3:14     ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-02  7:54   ` Chao Gao
2025-07-02  9:22     ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-07 12:37     ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250628125001.GDaF_k-e2KTo4QlKjl@fat_crate.local \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®