From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
x86@kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
nik.borisov@suse.com, sagis@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control wbinvd during kexec
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 14:50:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250628125001.GDaF_k-e2KTo4QlKjl@fat_crate.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b963fcd60abe26c7ec5dc20b42f1a2ebbcc72397.1750934177.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:48:47PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
...
> Doing WBINVD in stop_this_cpu() could potentially increase the chance to
> trigger the above "race" despite it's still rare to happen.
Oh the amount of text...
Please run it and all your comments through AI to simplify formulations etc.
It is a lot to read.
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 16 +++-------------
> arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S | 15 +++++++++++----
> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> index f2ad77929d6e..d7e93522b93d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ relocate_kernel_fn(unsigned long indirection_page,
> unsigned long pa_control_page,
> unsigned long start_address,
> unsigned int preserve_context,
> - unsigned int host_mem_enc_active);
> + unsigned int cache_incoherent);
So preserve_context and cache_incoherent are both a *single* bit of
information. And we use two u32s for that?!?!
How about flags please?
> #endif
> extern relocate_kernel_fn relocate_kernel;
> #define ARCH_HAS_KIMAGE_ARCH
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index bde58f6510ac..a24c7805acdb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dummy);
> void microcode_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *prev_info);
> void store_cpu_caps(struct cpuinfo_x86 *info);
>
So much text above - not a single comment here explaining what this var is
for.
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, cache_state_incoherent);
> +
> enum l1tf_mitigations {
> L1TF_MITIGATION_OFF,
> L1TF_MITIGATION_AUTO,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index f18f540db58c..4c7fde344216 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -503,6 +503,22 @@ static void early_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> u64 msr;
>
> + /*
> + * Mark using wbinvd is needed during kexec on processors that
For all text: write insns in caps pls - WBINVD.
> + * support SME. This provides support for performing a successful
> + * kexec when going from SME inactive to SME active (or vice-versa).
> + *
> + * The cache must be cleared so that if there are entries with the
> + * same physical address, both with and without the encryption bit,
> + * they don't race each other when flushed and potentially end up
> + * with the wrong entry being committed to memory.
> + *
> + * Test the CPUID bit directly because the machine might've cleared
> + * X86_FEATURE_SME due to cmdline options.
Where?
That same function does the clearing later...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 10:48 [PATCH v3 0/6] TDX host: kexec/kdump support Kai Huang
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control wbinvd during kexec Kai Huang
2025-06-26 17:59 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 18:42 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27 0:30 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-30 7:09 ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-27 0:37 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-27 0:39 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27 1:06 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-27 15:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-06-30 11:35 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-28 12:50 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2025-06-28 17:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-06-30 11:34 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-30 11:34 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-01 12:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-07-02 3:06 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/virt/tdx: Mark memory cache state incoherent when making SEAMCALL Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:37 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 23:36 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-27 0:52 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27 1:47 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/kexec: Disable kexec/kdump on platforms with TDX partial write erratum Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:49 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-07-01 5:37 ` Binbin Wu
2025-07-02 3:12 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-02 8:25 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-02 8:43 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-02 22:16 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-07-02 23:57 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/virt/tdx: Remove the !KEXEC_CORE dependency Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:49 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/virt/tdx: Update the kexec section in the TDX documentation Kai Huang
2025-06-26 18:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-26 10:48 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD upon reboot notifier Kai Huang
2025-06-27 0:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-27 1:00 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-01 6:09 ` Binbin Wu
2025-07-02 3:14 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-02 7:54 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-02 9:22 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-07 12:37 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250628125001.GDaF_k-e2KTo4QlKjl@fat_crate.local \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®