From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] smp: Remove get_cpu from smp_call_function_any
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:42:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205094226.GF232055@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203112401.3889029-4-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 07:23:53PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> Now smp_call_function_single() would enable preemption before
> csd_lock_wait() to reduce the critical section. To allow callers of
> smp_call_function_any() to also benefit from this optimization, remove
> get_cpu()/put_cpu() from smp_call_function_any().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
> ---
> kernel/smp.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 0858553f3666..f572716c3c7d 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -772,13 +772,18 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
> unsigned int cpu;
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Prevent migration to another CPU after selecting the current CPU
> + * as the target.
> + */
> + guard(migrate)();
> +
> /* Try for same CPU (cheapest) */
> - cpu = get_cpu();
> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
> cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(mask, 0, cpu_to_node(cpu));
>
> ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
> - put_cpu();
> return ret;
Urgh, that's horrible.
Basically what you want is something like so:
bool enable = true;
unsigned int cpu;
int ret;
preempt_disable();
cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask)) {
cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(mask, 0, cpu_to_node(cpu))
enable = false;
preempt_enable();
}
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
if (enable)
preempt_enable();
return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 11:23 [PATCH 00/11] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 6:05 ` Muchun Song
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 3:55 ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] smp: Remove get_cpu from smp_call_function_any Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 6:03 ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-02-06 8:54 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Use on-stack cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 9:07 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Enable preemption early " Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-05 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-05 14:29 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 8:43 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-06 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 11:45 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-09 7:56 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Remove preempt_disable from smp_call_function Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Remove preempt_disable from on_each_cpu_cond_mask Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable in scftorture_invoke_one Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:24 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/mm: Enable preemption during native_flush_tlb_multi Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:24 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/mm: Enable preemption during flush_tlb_kernel_range Chuyi Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205094226.GF232055@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®