mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chuyi Zhou" <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
	 <paulmck@kernel.org>, <muchun.song@linux.dev>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	 <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 22:29:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <261ae19f-e3d1-4017-be1e-90b5c6d91dc7@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205105704.GA245049@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Hi Peter,

在 2026/2/5 18:57, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 10:52:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 07:23:55PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>>
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Prevent the current CPU from going offline.
>>> +	 * Being migrated to another CPU and calling csd_lock_wait() may cause
>>> +	 * UAF due to smpcfd_dead_cpu() during the current CPU offline process.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	migrate_disable();
>>
>> This is horrible crap. migrate_disable() is *NOT* supposed to be used to
>> serialize cpu hotplug.
> 
> This was too complicated or something?
> 

Now most callers of smp_call*() explicitly use preempt_disable(). IIUC, 
if we want to use cpus_read_lock(), we first need to clean up all these 
preempt_disable() calls.

Maybe a stupid question: Why can't migrate_disable prevent CPU removal?

Before takedown_cpu(), all tasks need to be migrated to other CPUs, and 
all kthreads on that CPU must be parked, except the stopper thread and 
the hotplug thread.



> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -802,19 +802,20 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
>   					unsigned int scf_flags,
>   					smp_cond_func_t cond_func)
>   {
> -	int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -	struct call_function_data *cfd;
> +	struct call_function_data *cfd = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_data);
> +	struct cpumask *cpumask = cfd->cpumask;
>   	bool wait = scf_flags & SCF_WAIT;
> -	bool preemptible_wait = true;
>   	cpumask_var_t cpumask_stack;
> -	struct cpumask *cpumask;
> +	int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu;
>   	int nr_cpus = 0;
>   	bool run_remote = false;
>   
> -	lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
> +	if (wait && !alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask_stack, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +		cpumask = cpumask_stack;
>   
> -	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask_stack, GFP_ATOMIC))
> -		preemptible_wait = false;
> +	cpus_read_lock();
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
> @@ -836,10 +837,6 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
>   
>   	/* Check if we need remote execution, i.e., any CPU excluding this one. */
>   	if (cpumask_any_and_but(mask, cpu_online_mask, this_cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
> -		cfd = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_data);
> -
> -		cpumask = preemptible_wait ? cpumask_stack : cfd->cpumask;
> -
>   		cpumask_and(cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
>   		__cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, cpumask);
>   
> @@ -897,6 +894,7 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
>   		csd_do_func(func, info, NULL);
>   		local_irq_restore(flags);
>   	}
> +	preempt_enable();
>   
>   	if (run_remote && wait) {
>   		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
> @@ -907,8 +905,8 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (preemptible_wait)
> -		free_cpumask_var(cpumask_stack);
> +	cpus_read_unlock();
> +	free_cpumask_var(cpumask_stack);
>   }
>   
>   /**

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03 11:23 [PATCH 00/11] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05  6:05   ` Muchun Song
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05  3:55   ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] smp: Remove get_cpu from smp_call_function_any Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05  6:03   ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05  9:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06  8:54     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Use on-stack cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05  9:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06  9:07     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05  9:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Enable preemption early " Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05  9:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-05 10:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-05 14:29       ` Chuyi Zhou [this message]
2026-02-05 14:59         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06  8:43           ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-06  9:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 11:45               ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-09  7:56     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Remove preempt_disable from smp_call_function Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Remove preempt_disable from on_each_cpu_cond_mask Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable in scftorture_invoke_one Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:24 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/mm: Enable preemption during native_flush_tlb_multi Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:24 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/mm: Enable preemption during flush_tlb_kernel_range Chuyi Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=261ae19f-e3d1-4017-be1e-90b5c6d91dc7@bytedance.com \
    --to=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®