Re: [PATCH 04/11] smp: Use on-stack cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond

["Chuyi Zhou" <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>]

在 2026/2/5 17:44, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 07:23:54PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>> This patch use on-stack cpumask to replace percpu cfd cpumask in
>> smp_call_function_many_cond(). alloc_cpumask_var() may fail when
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is enabled. In such extreme case, fall back to
>> cfd->cpumask. This is a preparation for the next patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/smp.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index f572716c3c7d..35948afced2e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -805,11 +805,17 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>>   	int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>   	struct call_function_data *cfd;
>>   	bool wait = scf_flags & SCF_WAIT;
>> +	bool preemptible_wait = true;
>> +	cpumask_var_t cpumask_stack;
>> +	struct cpumask *cpumask;
>>   	int nr_cpus = 0;
>>   	bool run_remote = false;
>>   
>>   	lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
>>   
>> +	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask_stack, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> +		preemptible_wait = false;
> 
> IIRC this breaks RT, must not allocate with preemption disabled.

Thank you for the reminder.

Perhaps another feasible approach is only consider 
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n.

Of course, if we use cpus_read_lock and ensure that the caller’s context 
is sleepable, this issue would also be eliminated.