From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:57:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205105704.GA245049@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205095236.GI232055@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 10:52:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 07:23:55PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > + * Prevent the current CPU from going offline.
> > + * Being migrated to another CPU and calling csd_lock_wait() may cause
> > + * UAF due to smpcfd_dead_cpu() during the current CPU offline process.
> > + */
> > + migrate_disable();
>
> This is horrible crap. migrate_disable() is *NOT* supposed to be used to
> serialize cpu hotplug.
This was too complicated or something?
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -802,19 +802,20 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
unsigned int scf_flags,
smp_cond_func_t cond_func)
{
- int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct call_function_data *cfd;
+ struct call_function_data *cfd = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_data);
+ struct cpumask *cpumask = cfd->cpumask;
bool wait = scf_flags & SCF_WAIT;
- bool preemptible_wait = true;
cpumask_var_t cpumask_stack;
- struct cpumask *cpumask;
+ int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu;
int nr_cpus = 0;
bool run_remote = false;
- lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
+ if (wait && !alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask_stack, GFP_ATOMIC))
+ cpumask = cpumask_stack;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask_stack, GFP_ATOMIC))
- preemptible_wait = false;
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ preempt_disable();
+ this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
/*
* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
@@ -836,10 +837,6 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
/* Check if we need remote execution, i.e., any CPU excluding this one. */
if (cpumask_any_and_but(mask, cpu_online_mask, this_cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
- cfd = this_cpu_ptr(&cfd_data);
-
- cpumask = preemptible_wait ? cpumask_stack : cfd->cpumask;
-
cpumask_and(cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
__cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, cpumask);
@@ -897,6 +894,7 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
csd_do_func(func, info, NULL);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+ preempt_enable();
if (run_remote && wait) {
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
@@ -907,8 +905,8 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
}
}
- if (preemptible_wait)
- free_cpumask_var(cpumask_stack);
+ cpus_read_unlock();
+ free_cpumask_var(cpumask_stack);
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 11:23 [PATCH 00/11] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 6:05 ` Muchun Song
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 3:55 ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] smp: Remove get_cpu from smp_call_function_any Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 6:03 ` Muchun Song
2026-02-05 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 8:54 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] smp: Use on-stack cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 9:07 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] smp: Enable preemption early " Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-05 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-02-05 14:29 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-05 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 8:43 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-06 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-06 11:45 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-09 7:56 ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] smp: Remove preempt_disable from smp_call_function Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] smp: Remove preempt_disable from on_each_cpu_cond_mask Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable in scftorture_invoke_one Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:24 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/mm: Enable preemption during native_flush_tlb_multi Chuyi Zhou
2026-02-03 11:24 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/mm: Enable preemption during flush_tlb_kernel_range Chuyi Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205105704.GA245049@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®