mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Ben Horgan" <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	"Ștefania Ion" <stefion@google.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Pankaj Patil" <pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Jinjie Ruan" <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	"Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/23] arm64: cpufeature: Add read_cpuid_with_overrides()
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2026 11:07:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009100738.31288-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009100738.31288-1-will@kernel.org>

From: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>

__cpuinfo_store_cpu() stores the ID registers raw. Its gates on reading
a feature's register test those raw values. The exception is
gmid_el1_accessible(), which open-codes MTE's command-line override. It
checks the override with arm64_ftr_safe_value(), since
init_cpu_features() hasn't yet removed an unsafe one. The other gates
still read a feature's register when the command line disabled it. That's
the read that trapped on GMID_EL1.

Add read_cpuid_with_overrides(), which applies every valid override to
any register in arm64_ftr_regs[]. An override is valid when
arm64_ftr_safe_value() returns it unchanged. validate_ftr_regs() has
checked the table by the first store, so the lookup is safe there.
arm64_apply_feature_override() can't do this: it takes one field and no
descriptor to check the override against.

Store ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 through it, and replace gmid_el1_accessible()
with a test on the stored value at its three callers, as for SME.

Other readers of the stored value see the override too. With
arm64.nosme, __cpuinfo_store_cpu() no longer reads SMIDR_EL1. CPUs that
differ only in an ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 field the command line turned off no
longer taint the kernel. init_cpu_ftr_reg() logs a valid override as
"already set" rather than "forced".

The helper is Suzuki's override_cpu_ftr_reg(), without its other two
call sites.

Co-developed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/afc5bd00-28ca-413b-b047-ee53589c285d@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h        |  1 -
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 11 ++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++---------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c         |  4 +-
 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
index f332fbd8e46d..6d2a5ac4c2f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -79,6 +79,5 @@ void __init validate_ftr_regs(void);
 void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
 void update_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
 				 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot);
-bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
 
 #endif /* __ASM_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 4f04ad82ea34..5a4d25325856 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -627,6 +627,13 @@ static inline bool id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(u64 pfr1)
 	return val > 0;
 }
 
+static inline bool id_aa64pfr1_mte(u64 pfr1)
+{
+	u32 val = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_SHIFT);
+
+	return val >= ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2;
+}
+
 void __init setup_boot_cpu_features(void);
 void __init setup_system_features(void);
 void __init setup_user_features(void);
@@ -957,6 +964,10 @@ static inline unsigned int get_vmid_bits(u64 mmfr1)
 
 s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new, s64 cur);
 struct arm64_ftr_reg *get_arm64_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id);
+u64 arm64_ftr_reg_override(u32 sys_id, u64 val);
+
+/* Read this CPU's ID register with each valid command-line override applied. */
+#define read_cpuid_with_overrides(reg)	arm64_ftr_reg_override(SYS_##reg, read_cpuid(reg))
 
 extern struct arm64_ftr_override id_aa64mmfr0_override;
 extern struct arm64_ftr_override id_aa64mmfr1_override;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 727e1665c987..3161531ad401 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -962,6 +962,32 @@ s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+u64 arm64_ftr_reg_override(u32 sys_id, u64 val)
+{
+	struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_id);
+	const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
+
+	if (!reg || !reg->override->mask)
+		return val;
+
+	for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
+		u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
+		s64 ftr_new, ftr_ovr;
+
+		if ((ftr_mask & reg->override->mask) != ftr_mask)
+			continue;
+
+		ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, val);
+		ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, reg->override->val);
+
+		/* An unsafe override is left for init_cpu_ftr_reg() to remove. */
+		if (arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new) == ftr_ovr)
+			val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_ovr);
+	}
+
+	return val;
+}
+
 void __init validate_ftr_regs(void)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -1178,33 +1204,6 @@ static bool detect_ftr_has_mpam(void)
 	return id_aa64pfr0_mpam(pfr0) || id_aa64pfr1_mpamfrac(pfr1);
 }
 
-bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
-{
-	const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
-	s64 mte, ovr;
-	u64 ftr_mask;
-
-	/* No ID register reflects CONFIG_ARM64_MTE. */
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE))
-		return false;
-
-	for (ftrp = ftr_id_aa64pfr1; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
-		if (ftrp->shift == ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_SHIFT)
-			break;
-	}
-
-	ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
-	mte = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, info->reg_id_aa64pfr1);
-
-	/* The boot CPU runs before init_cpu_ftr_reg() strips unsafe overrides. */
-	if ((id_aa64pfr1_override.mask & ftr_mask) == ftr_mask) {
-		ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, id_aa64pfr1_override.val);
-		mte = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ovr, mte);
-	}
-
-	return mte >= ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2;
-}
-
 void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 {
 	init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, info->reg_ctr);
@@ -1254,7 +1253,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MPAMIDR_EL1, info->reg_mpamidr);
 	}
 
-	if (gmid_el1_accessible(info))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) && id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_GMID_EL1, info->reg_gmid);
 }
 
@@ -1516,7 +1515,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 	 * they read/write depends on the GMID_EL1.BS field. Check that the
 	 * value is the same on all CPUs.
 	 */
-	if (gmid_el1_accessible(info))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) && id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_GMID_EL1, cpu,
 					      info->reg_gmid, boot->reg_gmid);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 45c63f3d75c5..d48167fe4218 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -496,13 +496,13 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 	info->reg_id_aa64mmfr3 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64mmfr4 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64pfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
-	info->reg_id_aa64pfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1);
+	info->reg_id_aa64pfr1 = read_cpuid_with_overrides(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64pfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR2_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64zfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64smfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1);
 	info->reg_id_aa64fpfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64FPFR0_EL1);
 
-	if (gmid_el1_accessible(info))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) && id_aa64pfr1_mte(info->reg_id_aa64pfr1))
 		info->reg_gmid = read_cpuid(GMID_EL1);
 
 	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
-- 
2.56.0.385.gd3acb90ef8-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 10:07 [PATCH v2 00/23] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] cpu/hotplug: Clean up cmpxchg() logic in cpuhp_can_boot_ap() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] cpu/hotplug: Avoid trying to bring up CPUs that are already online Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:46   ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-09 11:07     ` Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] cpu/hotplug: Propagate bring-up status to arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] arm64: cpufeature: Check arm64_ftr_regs[] before the first store Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] arm64: cpufeature: Read MPAMIDR_EL1 in __cpuinfo_store_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 15:44   ` Ben Horgan
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] arm64: cpufeature: Store every ID register with its overrides applied Will Deacon
2026-10-09 15:51   ` Ben Horgan
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] arm64: smp: Tidy up smp_prepare_cpus() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] arm64: smp: Defer update of secondary CPU capabilities Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] arm64: smp: Don't bother printing the I-cache policy for each CPU Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP " Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] arm64: cpu_ops: Make 'cpu_operations' pointer global instead of per-cpu Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] arm64: cpu_ops: Introduce get_secondary_cpu_ops() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] firmware/psci: Cache PSCI v0.2+ version number to avoid redundant SMCs Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] firmware/psci: Extend ->cpu_on() callback to take an additional argument Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] arm64: cpu_ops: Expose optional argument to target cpu in ->cpu_boot() Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] arm64: smp: Pass secondary CPU boot parameters via firmware if possible Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_PARALLEL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] arm64: smp: Harden parallel CPU bringup against broken PSCI firmware Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009100738.31288-7-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=stefion@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®