From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:15:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2646dfa6-3f0f-49d1-a7d8-4b93fbd1ec71@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqPFpUw9Y4Ui8ia-@gpd4>
On 11.09.26 11:11, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 09.09.26 18:17, Andrea Righi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>>> On 09.09.26 08:26, Andrea Righi wrote:
[...]
> I think we can avoid an arm64 override entirely and rely on the default
> implementation:
>
> int __weak arch_asym_cpu_priority(int cpu)
> {
> return -cpu;
> }
>
> The boot option would only add SD_ASYM_PACKING to the SMT domain. A rough
> prototype could look like this in kernel/sched/topology.c:
>
> static bool sched_smt_asym_packing __read_mostly;
>
> static int __init setup_sched_smt_asym_packing(char *str)
> {
> sched_smt_asym_packing = true;
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("sched_smt_asym_packing", setup_sched_smt_asym_packing);
>
> int cpu_smt_flags(void)
> {
> int flags = SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_LLC;
>
> if (sched_smt_asym_packing)
> flags |= SD_ASYM_PACKING;
>
> return flags;
> }
>
> This would make the option generic rather than specific to arm64 or Olympus.
Ah, OK, no arm64 private 'struct sched_domain_topology_level
arm64_asym_smt_topology[]' anymore.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 6:26 [PATCH v5 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 15:19 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-09 16:17 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-10 10:11 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-11 9:11 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 14:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2026-09-09 15:34 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-09 16:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-10 8:53 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-11 6:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 14:11 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-11 22:34 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-09 6:41 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-09 15:36 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-09 21:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-08 8:23 [PATCH v4 " Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 8:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 20:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-08 20:57 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-04 9:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-04 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 21:13 ` Christian Loehle
2026-08-31 21:43 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-01 6:05 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-01 8:32 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-01 19:38 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2646dfa6-3f0f-49d1-a7d8-4b93fbd1ec71@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®