From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, "Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 01:39:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef19ea63-a4bc-407a-bca2-40a2818a3671@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908082345.103087-2-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hello Andrea,
On 9/8/2026 1:53 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> NVIDIA Olympus implements spatial SMT with symmetric steady-state PE
> capacity but two different resource modes. One-Thread Active mode gives
> one PE the full core, while waking the other PE restores Two-Thread
> Active mode and partitions decode, issue, cache, TLB, and vector
> resources. Returning to full-resource mode requires the sibling to
> remain in WFI for 10 Ki cycles.
>
> Measurements show that pinned workloads perform equally on either PE,
> but freely migratable workloads lose substantial throughput when they
> alternate between PE identities. Consistently selecting PE0 keeps PE1
> idle, avoids repeated SMT repartitioning, and restores
> one-thread-per-core performance.
>
> Describe this scheduling preference with SD_ASYM_PACKING and give PE0,
> identified by MPIDR_EL1.Aff0, the higher arch_asym_cpu_priority(). This
> is independent of SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY: SMT siblings retain equal
> capacity, while physical cores with different maximum frequencies are
> handled by a higher scheduling domain.
>
> Firmware currently provides no interface for describing the preferred
> SMT sibling. Detect Olympus by MIDR until such an interface is
> available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Feel free to include:
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Just one nit below ...
> +/*
> + * Switching the active PE on an NVIDIA Olympus SMT core can keep the core in
> + * two-thread active mode, with resources partitioned between the PEs.
> + *
> + * Prefer PE0 so PE1 can remain idle and the core can stay in full-resource
> + * mode. Firmware does not currently describe this preference, so detect
> + * Olympus by MIDR until a firmware interface is available.
> + */
> +static bool olympus_prefer_pe0 __ro_after_init;
nit. What is the purpose of "olympus_prefer_pe0"?
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +static int arm64_smt_flags(void)
> +{
> + int flags = cpu_smt_flags();
> +
> + if (olympus_prefer_pe0)
> + flags |= SD_ASYM_PACKING;
If this flag function is being used, olympus_prefer_pe0 is always true,
and the scheduler will never call into arch_asym_cpu_priority() without
SD_ASYM_PACKING being set so olympus_prefer_pe0 is always true there
too.
Seems redundant unless you were planning to do set_sched_topology()
unconditionally for whole of arm64.
> +
> + return flags;
> +}
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 8:23 [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 8:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 20:09 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-09-08 20:57 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 8:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-08 19:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-08 20:49 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-09 14:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-09 15:18 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 15:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-09 16:22 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 7:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-09 7:26 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 12:39 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 13:53 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-11 22:43 ` Andrea Righi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-09 6:26 [PATCH v5 " Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 6:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-09 15:19 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-09 16:17 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-10 10:11 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-11 9:11 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-11 14:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-09 15:34 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-09 16:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-10 8:53 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-11 6:50 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-07 16:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-09-04 9:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-04 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: topology: Prefer PE0 on NVIDIA Olympus SMT cores Andrea Righi
2026-08-31 21:13 ` Christian Loehle
2026-08-31 21:43 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-01 6:05 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-01 8:32 ` Christian Loehle
2026-09-01 19:38 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef19ea63-a4bc-407a-bca2-40a2818a3671@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®