From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>,
Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/20] hugetlb: Fully initialize tail struct pages of non-pre-HVOed bootmem folios
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 15:06:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30822F0C-88B8-4ACD-A0CD-F889F438EDB4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261003002123.505555-9-jthoughton@google.com>
> On Oct 3, 2026, at 08:21, James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> wrote:
>
> alloc_bootmem() marks all but the head struct page of a bootmem gigantic
> folio as noinit, and gather_bootmem_prealloc_node() then only
> initializes the first HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_RESERVE_PAGES struct pages. The
> remaining tail struct pages are initialized only if the folio ends up
> not being HVOed.
>
> This assumes that a bootmem folio is either pre-HVOed, or will not be
> HVOed at all. However, hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_bootmem_page() may skip
> pre-HVO because arch_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimization_supported() does not
> yet return true that early in boot (e.g. on arm64, where support depends
> on a system-wide CPU capability), while it does return true by the time
> hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_bootmem_folios() runs. Such folios are then
> HVOed through the regular remap path with uninitialized tail struct
> pages, which trips the PageTail() WARN in vmemmap_remap_pte().
>
> Avoid this by initializing all tail struct pages up front in
> gather_bootmem_prealloc_node() for folios that were not pre-HVOed. This
> makes the HVO-failure fallback in prep_and_add_bootmem_folios()
> unnecessary, as pre-HVOed folios are never passed through the regular
> remap path, and all other folios now already have initialized tail
> struct pages. A failed optimization either leaves the original vmemmap
> in place or restores the tail struct pages from the shared tail page.
> Remove the fallback.
>
> For folios that are not HVOed at all, this does not change the amount
> of initialization work, only where it is done.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 4dac7ed1df57..e971e2362412 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3303,17 +3303,6 @@ static void __init prep_and_add_bootmem_folios(struct hstate *h,
> hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_bootmem_folios(h, folio_list);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, tmp_f, folio_list, lru) {
> - if (!folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio)) {
> - /*
> - * If HVO fails, initialize all tail struct pages
> - * We do not worry about potential long lock hold
> - * time as this is early in boot and there should
> - * be no contention.
> - */
> - hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(folio, h,
> - HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_RESERVE_PAGES,
> - pages_per_huge_page(h));
> - }
Just for your information, I also plan to remove those code, see here [1].
I need to push this patch along quickly. I'm confident it won't take long.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260513132044.41690-15-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
Thanks,
Muchun
> hugetlb_bootmem_init_migratetype(folio, h);
> /* Subdivide locks to achieve better parallel performance */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
> @@ -3337,6 +3326,7 @@ static void __init gather_bootmem_prealloc_node(unsigned long nid)
> struct page *page = virt_to_page(m);
> struct folio *folio = (void *)page;
> const unsigned long pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
> + bool pre_hvo;
>
> h = m->hstate;
> /*
> @@ -3350,11 +3340,23 @@ static void __init gather_bootmem_prealloc_node(unsigned long nid)
> VM_BUG_ON(!hstate_is_gigantic(h));
> WARN_ON(folio_ref_count(folio) != 1);
>
> + pre_hvo = vmemmap_optimizable_order(pfn_to_section_compound_order(pfn));
> +
> + /*
> + * Pre-HVOed folios have their tail struct pages mirrored from
> + * the shared tail page, so only the first vmemmap page needs
> + * initializing. Otherwise, the tail struct pages (marked noinit
> + * in alloc_bootmem()) must all be initialized now: the folio
> + * may still be HVOed via the regular remap path (e.g. if the
> + * architecture could not determine HVO support at bootmem
> + * allocation time), which expects valid tail pages.
> + */
> hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap(folio, h,
> - HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_RESERVE_PAGES);
> + pre_hvo ? HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_RESERVE_PAGES :
> + pages_per_huge_page(h));
> init_new_hugetlb_folio(folio);
>
> - if (vmemmap_optimizable_order(pfn_to_section_compound_order(pfn)))
> + if (pre_hvo)
> folio_set_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio);
> section_set_compound_order_range(pfn, folio_nr_pages(folio), 0);
>
> --
> 2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-03 0:21 [PATCH v2 00/20] Another attempt at HVO support on arm64 James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] hugetlb: Don't restore vmemmap of non-HVOed folios on bulk restore error James Houghton
2026-10-21 9:32 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-21 21:27 ` James Houghton
2026-10-22 2:17 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64/pgtable: Clear AF with LDCLR on supported systems James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Always flush TLB if needed upon PTE remapping James Houghton
2026-10-21 9:54 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-21 21:59 ` James Houghton
2026-10-22 9:18 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-22 17:44 ` James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Leave pages partially HVOed upon restore failure James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Use try_update_vmemmap_pte to update in-use PTEs James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Allow architectures to dynamically disallow HVO James Houghton
2026-11-07 6:43 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Disable HVO sysctl if arch doesn't support HVO James Houghton
2026-11-07 7:01 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] hugetlb: Fully initialize tail struct pages of non-pre-HVOed bootmem folios James Houghton
2026-11-07 7:06 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Allow architectures to make HVO enablement boot-time only James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Expose whether HVO is enabled to architecture code James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: Add bbm_through_af capability James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: Implement try_update_vmemmap_pte using the AF trick James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: Support hugetlb vmemmap optimization James Houghton
2026-11-07 6:45 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] hugetlb_vmemmap: Add fault injection for in-place vmemmap PTE updates James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] selftests/mm: Add HugeTLB vmemmap optimization stress test James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 16/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] hugetlb_vmemmap: Use try_populate_vmemmap_pmd for replacing in-use PMDs James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 17/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] arm64: Implement try_populate_vmemmap_pmd using AF trick James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 18/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] arm64: Drop BBML3 requirement for HVO James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 19/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] hugetlb_vmemmap: Add fault injection for in-place vmemmap PMD splits James Houghton
2026-10-03 0:21 ` [PATCH v2 20/20 DO-NOT-MERGE] selftests/mm: Add HVO pmd-split fault injection tests James Houghton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30822F0C-88B8-4ACD-A0CD-F889F438EDB4@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=linu.cherian@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®