From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch v4 20/22] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 14:52:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38b46d29cf56285992f4604b450abbf91ecf3313.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Introduce a set of debugfs knobs to control how aggressive the
cache aware scheduling do the task aggregation.
(1) aggr_tolerance
With sched_cache enabled, the scheduler uses a process's RSS as a
proxy for its LLC footprint to determine if aggregating tasks on the
preferred LLC could cause cache contention. If RSS exceeds the LLC
size, aggregation is skipped. Some workloads with large RSS but small
actual memory footprints may still benefit from aggregation. Since
the kernel cannot efficiently track per-task cache usage (resctrl is
user-space only), userspace can provide a more accurate hint.
Introduce /sys/kernel/debug/sched/llc_balancing/aggr_tolerance to
let users control how strictly RSS limits aggregation. Values range
from 0 to 100:
- 0: Cache-aware scheduling is disabled.
- 1: Strict; tasks with RSS larger than LLC size are skipped.
- >=100: Aggressive; tasks are aggregated regardless of RSS.
For example, with a 32MB L3 cache:
- aggr_tolerance=1 -> tasks with RSS > 32MB are skipped.
- aggr_tolerance=99 -> tasks with RSS > 784GB are skipped
(784GB = (1 + (99 - 1) * 256) * 32MB).
Similarly, /sys/kernel/debug/sched/llc_balancing/aggr_tolerance also
controls how strictly the number of active threads is considered when
doing cache aware load balance. The number of SMTs is also considered.
High SMT counts reduce the aggregation capacity, preventing excessive
task aggregation on SMT-heavy systems like Power10/Power11.
Yangyu suggested introducing separate aggregation controls for the
number of active threads and memory RSS checks. Since there are plans
to add per-process/task group controls, fine-grained tunables are
deferred to that implementation.
(2) epoch_period, epoch_affinity_timeout,
imb_pct, overaggr_pct are also turned into tunable.
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>
Suggested-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
Notes:
v3->v4:
Create the debugfs knobs under debug/sched/llc_balancing directory.
(Peter Zijlstra)
kernel/sched/debug.c | 10 ++++++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 3019412d8009..4469e1c152c8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -669,6 +669,16 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
llc = debugfs_create_dir("llc_balancing", debugfs_sched);
debugfs_create_file("enabled", 0644, llc, NULL,
&sched_cache_enable_fops);
+ debugfs_create_u32("aggr_tolerance", 0644, llc,
+ &llc_aggr_tolerance);
+ debugfs_create_u32("epoch_period", 0644, llc,
+ &llc_epoch_period);
+ debugfs_create_u32("epoch_affinity_timeout", 0644, llc,
+ &llc_epoch_affinity_timeout);
+ debugfs_create_u32("overaggr_pct", 0644, llc,
+ &llc_overaggr_pct);
+ debugfs_create_u32("imb_pct", 0644, llc,
+ &llc_imb_pct);
#endif
debugfs_create_file("debug", 0444, debugfs_sched, NULL, &sched_debug_fops);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a2d1b8b2a188..e4e22696a0b1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1282,6 +1282,11 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se);
*/
#define EPOCH_PERIOD (HZ / 100) /* 10 ms */
#define EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT 5 /* 50 ms */
+__read_mostly unsigned int llc_aggr_tolerance = 1;
+__read_mostly unsigned int llc_epoch_period = EPOCH_PERIOD;
+__read_mostly unsigned int llc_epoch_affinity_timeout = EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT;
+__read_mostly unsigned int llc_imb_pct = 20;
+__read_mostly unsigned int llc_overaggr_pct = 50;
static int llc_id(int cpu)
{
@@ -1316,10 +1321,22 @@ static inline bool valid_llc_buf(struct sched_domain *sd,
return true;
}
+static inline int get_sched_cache_scale(int mul)
+{
+ if (!llc_aggr_tolerance)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (llc_aggr_tolerance >= 100)
+ return INT_MAX;
+
+ return (1 + (llc_aggr_tolerance - 1) * mul);
+}
+
static bool exceed_llc_capacity(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu)
{
struct cacheinfo *ci;
u64 rss, llc;
+ int scale;
/*
* get_cpu_cacheinfo_level() can not be used
@@ -1344,13 +1361,42 @@ static bool exceed_llc_capacity(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu)
rss = get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES) +
get_mm_counter(mm, MM_SHMEMPAGES);
- return (llc < (rss * PAGE_SIZE));
+ /*
+ * Scale the LLC size by 256*llc_aggr_tolerance
+ * and compare it to the task's RSS size.
+ *
+ * Suppose the L3 size is 32MB. If the
+ * llc_aggr_tolerance is 1:
+ * When the RSS is larger than 32MB, the process
+ * is regarded as exceeding the LLC capacity. If
+ * the llc_aggr_tolerance is 99:
+ * When the RSS is larger than 784GB, the process
+ * is regarded as exceeding the LLC capacity:
+ * 784GB = (1 + (99 - 1) * 256) * 32MB
+ * If the llc_aggr_tolerance is 100:
+ * ignore the RSS.
+ */
+ scale = get_sched_cache_scale(256);
+ if (scale == INT_MAX)
+ return false;
+
+ return ((llc * (u64)scale) < (rss * PAGE_SIZE));
}
static bool exceed_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu)
{
+ int scale;
+
+ /*
+ * Scale the number of 'cores' in a LLC by llc_aggr_tolerance
+ * and compare it to the task's active threads.
+ */
+ scale = get_sched_cache_scale(1);
+ if (scale == INT_MAX)
+ return false;
+
return !fits_capacity((mm->sc_stat.nr_running_avg * cpu_smt_num_threads),
- per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu));
+ (scale * per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu)));
}
static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1448,9 +1494,9 @@ static inline void __update_mm_sched(struct rq *rq,
long delta = now - rq->cpu_epoch_next;
if (delta > 0) {
- n = (delta + EPOCH_PERIOD - 1) / EPOCH_PERIOD;
+ n = (delta + llc_epoch_period - 1) / max(llc_epoch_period, 1U);
rq->cpu_epoch += n;
- rq->cpu_epoch_next += n * EPOCH_PERIOD;
+ rq->cpu_epoch_next += n * llc_epoch_period;
__shr_u64(&rq->cpu_runtime, n);
}
@@ -1543,7 +1589,7 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
* has only 1 thread, invalidate its preferred state.
*/
if (time_after(epoch,
- READ_ONCE(mm->sc_stat.epoch) + EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT) ||
+ READ_ONCE(mm->sc_stat.epoch) + llc_epoch_affinity_timeout) ||
get_nr_threads(p) <= 1 ||
exceed_llc_nr(mm, cpu_of(rq)) ||
exceed_llc_capacity(mm, cpu_of(rq))) {
@@ -10018,7 +10064,7 @@ static inline int task_is_ineligible_on_dst_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int dest_
*/
static bool fits_llc_capacity(unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
{
- u32 aggr_pct = 50;
+ u32 aggr_pct = llc_overaggr_pct;
/*
* For single core systems, raise the aggregation
@@ -10038,7 +10084,7 @@ static bool fits_llc_capacity(unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
*/
/* Allows dst util to be bigger than src util by up to bias percent */
#define util_greater(util1, util2) \
- ((util1) * 100 > (util2) * 120)
+ ((util1) * 100 > (util2) * (100 + llc_imb_pct))
static __maybe_unused bool get_llc_stats(int cpu, unsigned long *util,
unsigned long *cap)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 5561bdcc8bf5..b757812725f7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -4038,6 +4038,11 @@ static inline void mm_cid_switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_present);
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_active);
extern int sysctl_sched_cache_user;
+extern unsigned int llc_aggr_tolerance;
+extern unsigned int llc_epoch_period;
+extern unsigned int llc_epoch_affinity_timeout;
+extern unsigned int llc_imb_pct;
+extern unsigned int llc_overaggr_pct;
static inline bool sched_cache_enabled(void)
{
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 21:52 [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 01/22] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-09 23:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 6:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-15 2:06 ` Vern Hao
2026-04-15 3:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 02/22] sched/cache: Limit the scan number of CPUs when calculating task occupancy Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:17 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-09 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 10:12 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 7:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 10:20 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 17:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-10 17:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 7:23 ` [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: dynamically scale the period of cache work Jianyong Wu
2026-04-13 8:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 11:27 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 3:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-16 3:39 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 17:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 6:50 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-14 15:07 ` [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Reduce the overhead of task_cache_work by only scan the visisted cpus Luo Gengkun
2026-04-15 3:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-18 9:01 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-20 7:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-23 8:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Luo Gengkun
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 03/22] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 04/22] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 05/22] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 06/22] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 07/22] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 08/22] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 09/22] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 10/22] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 11/22] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 12/22] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 13/22] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 14/22] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 15/22] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 16/22] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:27 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 17/22] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 8:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 18/22] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:39 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 19/22] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 21/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 22/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:54 ` [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 20:02 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-14 3:20 ` Duan Tingyin
2026-04-15 17:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 0:27 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-20 9:01 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-21 0:34 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-21 20:57 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-23 15:06 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 16:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:05 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:14 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38b46d29cf56285992f4604b450abbf91ecf3313.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox