From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch v4 16/22] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 14:52:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47cc4cffecdac2770a719c84bec3b459a1256def.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
A performance regression was observed by Prateek when running hackbench
with many threads per process (high fd count). To avoid this, processes
with a large number of active threads are excluded from cache-aware
scheduling.
With sched_cache enabled, record the number of active threads in each
process during the periodic task_cache_work(). While iterating over
CPUs, if the currently running task belongs to the same process as the
task that launched task_cache_work(), increment the active thread count.
If the number of active threads within the process exceeds the number
of Cores(divided by SMTs number) in the LLC, do not enable cache-aware
scheduling. However, on system with smaller number of CPUs within 1 LLC,
like Power10/Power11 with SMT4 and LLC size of 4, this check effectively
disables cache-aware scheduling for any process. One possible solution
suggested by Peter is to use a LLC-mask instead of a single LLC value
for preference. Once there are a 'few' LLCs as preference, this constraint
becomes a little easier. It could be an enhancement in the future.
For users who wish to perform task aggregation regardless, a debugfs knob
is provided for tuning in a subsequent patch.
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
Notes:
v3->v4:
Use cpu_smt_num_threads instead of cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu))
(Peter Zijlstra)
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 526108acc483..dfa4bfd099c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2392,6 +2392,7 @@ struct sched_cache_stat {
struct sched_cache_time __percpu *pcpu_sched;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
unsigned long epoch;
+ u64 nr_running_avg;
int cpu;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9541e94370e7..077ae7875e2e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1316,6 +1316,12 @@ static inline bool valid_llc_buf(struct sched_domain *sd,
return true;
}
+static bool exceed_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu)
+{
+ return !fits_capacity((mm->sc_stat.nr_running_avg * cpu_smt_num_threads),
+ per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu));
+}
+
static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
@@ -1507,7 +1513,8 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
*/
if (time_after(epoch,
READ_ONCE(mm->sc_stat.epoch) + EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT) ||
- get_nr_threads(p) <= 1) {
+ get_nr_threads(p) <= 1 ||
+ exceed_llc_nr(mm, cpu_of(rq))) {
if (mm->sc_stat.cpu != -1)
mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1;
}
@@ -1592,13 +1599,31 @@ static void get_scan_cpumasks(cpumask_var_t cpus, struct task_struct *p)
cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_online_mask);
}
+static inline void update_avg_scale(u64 *avg, u64 sample)
+{
+ int factor = per_cpu(sd_llc_size, raw_smp_processor_id());
+ s64 diff = sample - *avg;
+ u32 divisor;
+
+ /*
+ * Scale the divisor based on the number of CPUs contained
+ * in the LLC. This scaling ensures smaller LLC domains use
+ * a smaller divisor to achieve more precise sensitivity to
+ * changes in nr_running, while larger LLC domains are capped
+ * at a maximum divisor of 8 which is the default smoothing
+ * factor of EWMA in update_avg().
+ */
+ divisor = clamp_t(u32, (factor >> 2), 2, 8);
+ *avg += div64_s64(diff, divisor);
+}
+
static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
{
- struct task_struct *p = current;
+ struct task_struct *p = current, *cur;
+ int cpu, m_a_cpu = -1, nr_running = 0;
+ unsigned long curr_m_a_occ = 0;
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
unsigned long m_a_occ = 0;
- unsigned long curr_m_a_occ = 0;
- int cpu, m_a_cpu = -1;
cpumask_var_t cpus;
WARN_ON_ONCE(work != &p->cache_work);
@@ -1608,6 +1633,13 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
return;
+ if (get_nr_threads(p) <= 1) {
+ if (mm->sc_stat.cpu != -1)
+ mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1;
+
+ return;
+ }
+
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
return;
@@ -1631,6 +1663,12 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
m_occ = occ;
m_cpu = i;
}
+ scoped_guard (rcu) {
+ cur = rcu_dereference_all(cpu_rq(i)->curr);
+ if (cur && !(cur->flags & (PF_EXITING | PF_KTHREAD)) &&
+ cur->mm == mm)
+ nr_running++;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -1674,6 +1712,7 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
mm->sc_stat.cpu = m_a_cpu;
}
+ update_avg_scale(&mm->sc_stat.nr_running_avg, nr_running);
free_cpumask_var(cpus);
}
@@ -10105,6 +10144,13 @@ static enum llc_mig can_migrate_llc_task(int src_cpu, int dst_cpu,
if (cpu < 0 || cpus_share_cache(src_cpu, dst_cpu))
return mig_unrestricted;
+ /* skip cache aware load balance for single/too many threads */
+ if (get_nr_threads(p) <= 1 || exceed_llc_nr(mm, dst_cpu)) {
+ if (mm->sc_stat.cpu != -1)
+ mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1;
+ return mig_unrestricted;
+ }
+
if (cpus_share_cache(dst_cpu, cpu))
to_pref = true;
else if (cpus_share_cache(src_cpu, cpu))
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 21:52 [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 01/22] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-09 23:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 6:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-15 2:06 ` Vern Hao
2026-04-15 3:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 02/22] sched/cache: Limit the scan number of CPUs when calculating task occupancy Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:17 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-09 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 10:12 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 7:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 10:20 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 17:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-10 17:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 7:23 ` [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: dynamically scale the period of cache work Jianyong Wu
2026-04-13 8:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 11:27 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 3:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-16 3:39 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 17:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 6:50 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-14 15:07 ` [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Reduce the overhead of task_cache_work by only scan the visisted cpus Luo Gengkun
2026-04-15 3:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-18 9:01 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-20 7:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-23 8:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Luo Gengkun
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 03/22] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 04/22] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 05/22] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 06/22] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 07/22] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 08/22] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 09/22] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 10/22] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 11/22] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 12/22] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 13/22] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 14/22] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 15/22] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-04-09 12:43 ` [Patch v4 16/22] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:27 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 17/22] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 8:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 18/22] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:39 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 19/22] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 20/22] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 21/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 22/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:54 ` [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 20:02 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-14 3:20 ` Duan Tingyin
2026-04-15 17:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 0:27 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-20 9:01 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-21 0:34 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-21 20:57 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-23 15:06 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 16:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:05 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:14 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47cc4cffecdac2770a719c84bec3b459a1256def.1775065312.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox