From: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com>
To: <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>, <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
<bsegall@google.com>, <cyy@cyyself.name>,
<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
<haoxing990@gmail.com>, <hdanton@sina.com>,
<jianyong.wu@outlook.com>, <joshdon@google.com>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
<len.brown@intel.com>, <libchen@purestorage.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <luogengkun2@huawei.com>,
<mgorman@suse.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<qyousef@layalina.io>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<sshegde@linux.ibm.com>, <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
<tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
<vernhao@tencent.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<vineethr@linux.ibm.com>, <vschneid@redhat.com>,
<zhao1.liu@intel.com>, <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Reduce the overhead of task_cache_work by only scan the visisted cpus.
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:07:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414150745.225416-1-luogengkun2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4fb7a6da-447d-452a-a920-7cd39b939ccb@intel.com>
The overhead of task_cache_work is high, espeically in multi-NUMA system.
Currently, task_cache_work try to find the pref_llc by scan all cpus in the
system. However, most of these scans are meaningless, such as those for
cpus that have never been visited or were accessed a long time ago.
To address this problem, this patch introduces visited_cpus to track the
visited cpus and uses llc_epoch_visited_timeout to evict cpus that have
timed out.
Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com>
---
Thanks for the reviews. I've updated the patch based on your feedback.
v2 Changes:
1. Added a pre-check before set/clear visited_cpus to avoid C2C overhead.
2. Optimized llc_epoch_visited_timeout by using a static key to minimize overhead.
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/debug.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index dfa4bfd099c6..f2327a13fda8 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2390,6 +2390,7 @@ struct sched_cache_time {
struct sched_cache_stat {
struct sched_cache_time __percpu *pcpu_sched;
+ struct cpumask visited_cpus;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
unsigned long epoch;
u64 nr_running_avg;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 4469e1c152c8..46aa73939f9e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -247,6 +247,54 @@ static const struct file_operations sched_cache_enable_fops = {
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = single_release,
};
+
+static void sched_cache_timeout_set(void)
+{
+ if (llc_epoch_visited_timeout) {
+ if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_timeout))
+ static_branch_enable(&sched_cache_timeout);
+ } else {
+ if (static_branch_likely(&sched_cache_timeout))
+ static_branch_disable(&sched_cache_timeout);
+ }
+}
+
+static ssize_t
+sched_cache_timeout_enable_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
+ size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ int val, ret;
+
+ ret = kstrtouint_from_user(ubuf, cnt, 10, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ llc_epoch_visited_timeout = val;
+
+ sched_cache_timeout_set();
+
+ return cnt;
+}
+
+static int sched_cache_timeout_enable_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+ seq_printf(m, "%d\n", llc_epoch_visited_timeout);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sched_cache_timeout_enable_open(struct inode *inode,
+ struct file *filp)
+{
+ return single_open(filp, sched_cache_timeout_enable_show, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations sched_cache_timeout_enable_fops = {
+ .open = sched_cache_timeout_enable_open,
+ .write = sched_cache_timeout_enable_write,
+ .read = seq_read,
+ .llseek = seq_lseek,
+ .release = single_release,
+};
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
@@ -669,6 +717,8 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
llc = debugfs_create_dir("llc_balancing", debugfs_sched);
debugfs_create_file("enabled", 0644, llc, NULL,
&sched_cache_enable_fops);
+ debugfs_create_file("epoch_visited_timeout", 0644, llc, NULL,
+ &sched_cache_timeout_enable_fops);
debugfs_create_u32("aggr_tolerance", 0644, llc,
&llc_aggr_tolerance);
debugfs_create_u32("epoch_period", 0644, llc,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e4e22696a0b1..89f44ea97fee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1285,9 +1285,12 @@ static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se);
__read_mostly unsigned int llc_aggr_tolerance = 1;
__read_mostly unsigned int llc_epoch_period = EPOCH_PERIOD;
__read_mostly unsigned int llc_epoch_affinity_timeout = EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT;
+__read_mostly unsigned int llc_epoch_visited_timeout = EPOCH_LLC_AFFINITY_TIMEOUT;
__read_mostly unsigned int llc_imb_pct = 20;
__read_mostly unsigned int llc_overaggr_pct = 50;
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sched_cache_timeout);
+
static int llc_id(int cpu)
{
if (cpu < 0)
@@ -1466,6 +1469,7 @@ void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm,
raw_spin_lock_init(&mm->sc_stat.lock);
mm->sc_stat.epoch = epoch;
mm->sc_stat.cpu = -1;
+ cpumask_clear(&mm->sc_stat.visited_cpus);
/*
* The update to mm->sc_stat should not be reordered
@@ -1582,6 +1586,9 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
pcpu_sched->runtime += delta_exec;
rq->cpu_runtime += delta_exec;
epoch = rq->cpu_epoch;
+ if (sched_cache_timeout_enabled() &&
+ !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_of(rq), &mm->sc_stat.visited_cpus))
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_of(rq), &mm->sc_stat.visited_cpus);
}
/*
@@ -1724,7 +1731,10 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
return;
scoped_guard (cpus_read_lock) {
- get_scan_cpumasks(cpus, p);
+ if (!sched_cache_timeout_enabled())
+ get_scan_cpumasks(cpus, p);
+ else
+ cpumask_and(cpus, cpu_online_mask, &mm->sc_stat.visited_cpus);
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
/* XXX sched_cluster_active */
@@ -1736,8 +1746,17 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
continue;
for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
- occ = fraction_mm_sched(cpu_rq(i),
- per_cpu_ptr(mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched, i));
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+ struct sched_cache_time *pcpu_sched = per_cpu_ptr(mm->sc_stat.pcpu_sched, i);
+ /* Skip the rq that has not been hit for a long time */
+ if (sched_cache_timeout_enabled() &&
+ cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_of(rq), &mm->sc_stat.visited_cpus) &&
+ (rq->cpu_epoch - pcpu_sched->epoch) >
+ llc_epoch_visited_timeout) {
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(rq), &mm->sc_stat.visited_cpus);
+ continue;
+ }
+ occ = fraction_mm_sched(rq, pcpu_sched);
a_occ += occ;
if (occ > m_occ) {
m_occ = occ;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index b757812725f7..2ba09e9567af 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -4037,10 +4037,12 @@ static inline void mm_cid_switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_present);
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cache_active);
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sched_cache_timeout);
extern int sysctl_sched_cache_user;
extern unsigned int llc_aggr_tolerance;
extern unsigned int llc_epoch_period;
extern unsigned int llc_epoch_affinity_timeout;
+extern unsigned int llc_epoch_visited_timeout;
extern unsigned int llc_imb_pct;
extern unsigned int llc_overaggr_pct;
@@ -4051,6 +4053,10 @@ static inline bool sched_cache_enabled(void)
extern void sched_cache_active_set_unlocked(void);
+static inline bool sched_cache_timeout_enabled(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&sched_cache_timeout);
+}
#endif
void sched_domains_free_llc_id(int cpu);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 21:52 [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 01/22] sched/cache: Introduce infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:21 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-09 23:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 6:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-15 2:06 ` Vern Hao
2026-04-15 3:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-09-14 17:50 ` Zenghui Yu
2026-09-14 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-18 7:14 ` Zenghui Yu
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 02/22] sched/cache: Limit the scan number of CPUs when calculating task occupancy Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:17 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-09 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 10:12 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 7:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 10:20 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-10 17:12 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-10 17:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 7:23 ` [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: dynamically scale the period of cache work Jianyong Wu
2026-04-13 8:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-13 11:27 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 3:31 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-16 3:39 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-15 17:22 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 6:50 ` Jianyong Wu
2026-04-14 15:07 ` Luo Gengkun [this message]
2026-04-15 3:10 ` [PATCH v2] sched/cache: Reduce the overhead of task_cache_work by only scan the visisted cpus Chen, Yu C
2026-04-18 9:01 ` Luo Gengkun
2026-04-20 7:53 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-23 8:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Luo Gengkun
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 03/22] sched/cache: Record per LLC utilization to guide cache aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 04/22] sched/cache: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 05/22] sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 06/22] sched/cache: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 07/22] sched/cache: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 08/22] sched/cache: Introduce per CPU's tasks LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 09/22] sched/cache: Calculate the percpu sd task LLC preference Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 10/22] sched/cache: Count tasks prefering destination LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 11/22] sched/cache: Check local_group only once in update_sg_lb_stats() Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 12/22] sched/cache: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 13/22] sched/cache: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 14/22] sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 15/22] sched/cache: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 16/22] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:27 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 17/22] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-04-09 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-10 8:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-10 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 18/22] sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for multi LLCs NUMA node Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 19:39 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 19/22] sched/cache: Allow the user space to turn on and off cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 20/22] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 21/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Display the per LLC occupancy for each process via proc fs Tim Chen
2026-04-01 21:52 ` [Patch v4 22/22] -- DO NOT APPLY!!! -- sched/cache/debug: Add ftrace to track the load balance statistics Tim Chen
2026-04-09 13:54 ` [Patch v4 00/22] Cache aware scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-09 20:02 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-14 3:20 ` Duan Tingyin
2026-04-15 17:35 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-16 0:27 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-20 9:01 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-21 0:34 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-21 20:57 ` Tim Chen
2026-04-23 15:06 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 16:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:05 ` Qais Yousef
2026-04-23 17:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-04-25 0:14 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260414150745.225416-1-luogengkun2@huawei.com \
--to=luogengkun2@huawei.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®