* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing
[not found] ` <864065cfcd3baaff212135beb781b0a5990728d8@intel.com>
@ 2026-03-18 5:51 ` Rahul Bukte
2026-03-18 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rahul Bukte @ 2026-03-18 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: Suraj Kandpal, intel-xe, intel-gfx, linux-kernel
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2026, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com>
> >
> > When the i915 driver firmware binaries are not present, the
> > set_default_submission pointer is not set. This pointer is
> > dereferenced during suspend anyways.
>
> Which kernel vesions did this happen with? Should this have had Fixes:
> or Cc: stable?
Fixes: ff44ad51ebf8 ("drm/i915: Move engine->submit_request selection to a vfunc")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suraj, you mentioned that you have commited this to din [1]. Can we add
this fixes and cc tags to that please?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM3PPF208195D8D000253F905FADCA379F9E36DA@DM3PPF208195D8D.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
Best regards,
Rahul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing
2026-03-18 5:51 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing Rahul Bukte
@ 2026-03-18 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2026-03-18 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rahul Bukte, Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Suraj Kandpal, intel-xe, intel-gfx, linux-kernel
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026, Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2026, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
>> > From: Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com>
>> >
>> > When the i915 driver firmware binaries are not present, the
>> > set_default_submission pointer is not set. This pointer is
>> > dereferenced during suspend anyways.
>>
>> Which kernel vesions did this happen with? Should this have had Fixes:
>> or Cc: stable?
>
> Fixes: ff44ad51ebf8 ("drm/i915: Move engine->submit_request selection to a vfunc")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> Suraj, you mentioned that you have commited this to din [1]. Can we add
> this fixes and cc tags to that please?
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM3PPF208195D8D000253F905FADCA379F9E36DA@DM3PPF208195D8D.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
Tvrtko, please pick this up for drm-intel-fixes.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-18 9:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260203044839.1555147-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
[not found] ` <864065cfcd3baaff212135beb781b0a5990728d8@intel.com>
2026-03-18 5:51 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing Rahul Bukte
2026-03-18 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®