* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing [not found] ` <864065cfcd3baaff212135beb781b0a5990728d8@intel.com> @ 2026-03-18 5:51 ` Rahul Bukte 2026-03-18 9:41 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Rahul Bukte @ 2026-03-18 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: Suraj Kandpal, intel-xe, intel-gfx, linux-kernel Hi, On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 03 Feb 2026, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote: > > From: Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com> > > > > When the i915 driver firmware binaries are not present, the > > set_default_submission pointer is not set. This pointer is > > dereferenced during suspend anyways. > > Which kernel vesions did this happen with? Should this have had Fixes: > or Cc: stable? Fixes: ff44ad51ebf8 ("drm/i915: Move engine->submit_request selection to a vfunc") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suraj, you mentioned that you have commited this to din [1]. Can we add this fixes and cc tags to that please? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM3PPF208195D8D000253F905FADCA379F9E36DA@DM3PPF208195D8D.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Best regards, Rahul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing 2026-03-18 5:51 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing Rahul Bukte @ 2026-03-18 9:41 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2026-03-18 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rahul Bukte, Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Suraj Kandpal, intel-xe, intel-gfx, linux-kernel On Wed, 18 Mar 2026, Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Feb 2026, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote: >> > From: Rahul Bukte <rahul.bukte@sony.com> >> > >> > When the i915 driver firmware binaries are not present, the >> > set_default_submission pointer is not set. This pointer is >> > dereferenced during suspend anyways. >> >> Which kernel vesions did this happen with? Should this have had Fixes: >> or Cc: stable? > > Fixes: ff44ad51ebf8 ("drm/i915: Move engine->submit_request selection to a vfunc") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Suraj, you mentioned that you have commited this to din [1]. Can we add > this fixes and cc tags to that please? > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM3PPF208195D8D000253F905FADCA379F9E36DA@DM3PPF208195D8D.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Tvrtko, please pick this up for drm-intel-fixes. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-18 9:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260203044839.1555147-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
[not found] ` <864065cfcd3baaff212135beb781b0a5990728d8@intel.com>
2026-03-18 5:51 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Check set_default_submission() before deferencing Rahul Bukte
2026-03-18 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®