From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 23:50:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0527CB.4020807@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A05269D.8000701@kernel.org>
recently there are some changes to about meaning of node_possible_map
and it is some strange:
the node without memory would be set in node_possible_map
but some node with less NODE_MIN_SIZE will be kicked out of node_possible_map.
try to fix it by adding strict_setup_node_bootmem.
also remove unparse_node.
so result will be:
1. cpu_to_node will return online node only (nearest one)
2. apicid_to_node still return the node that could be not online but is set
in node_possible_map.
3. node_possible_map will include nodes that mem on it are less NODE_MIN_SIZE
v2: after move_cpus_to_node change.
[ Impact: get node_possible_map right ]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 4 ++++
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 7 +++++++
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 29 ++---------------------------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -36,10 +36,6 @@ static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
static struct bootnode node_memblk_range[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
static int memblk_nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
-/* Too small nodes confuse the VM badly. Usually they result
- from BIOS bugs. */
-#define NODE_MIN_SIZE (4*1024*1024)
-
static __init int setup_node(int pxm)
{
return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
@@ -338,17 +334,6 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(con
return 1;
}
-static void __init unparse_node(int node)
-{
- int i;
- node_clear(node, nodes_parsed);
- node_clear(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; i++) {
- if (apicid_to_node[i] == node)
- apicid_to_node[i] = NUMA_NO_NODE;
- }
-}
-
void __init acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void) {}
/* Use the information discovered above to actually set up the nodes. */
@@ -360,18 +345,8 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
return -1;
/* First clean up the node list */
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++)
cutoff_node(i, start, end);
- /*
- * don't confuse VM with a node that doesn't have the
- * minimum memory.
- */
- if (nodes[i].end &&
- (nodes[i].end - nodes[i].start) < NODE_MIN_SIZE) {
- unparse_node(i);
- node_set_offline(i);
- }
- }
if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) {
bad_srat();
@@ -404,7 +379,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
continue;
- if (!node_isset(node, node_possible_map))
+ if (!node_online(node))
numa_clear_node(i);
}
numa_init_array();
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodei
if (!end)
return;
+ /*
+ * don't confuse VM with a node that doesn't have the
+ * minimum memory.
+ */
+ if (end && (end - start) < NODE_MIN_SIZE)
+ return;
+
start = roundup(start, ZONE_ALIGN);
printk(KERN_INFO "Bootmem setup node %d %016lx-%016lx\n", nodeid,
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodei
unsigned long end);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+/* Too small nodes confuse the VM badly. Usually they result
+ from BIOS bugs. */
+#define NODE_MIN_SIZE (4*1024*1024)
+
extern void __init init_cpu_to_node(void);
extern void numa_set_node(int cpu, int node);
extern void numa_clear_node(int cpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-09 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-09 6:45 [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09 6:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09 7:05 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-05-12 1:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-11 21:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 17:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-13 5:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09 6:50 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-05-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 19:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:27 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 21:26 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-11 22:25 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-12 15:06 ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 15:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 16:16 ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 16:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 18:03 ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 21:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:58 ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 23:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 23:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 15:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 1:34 ` [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 8:00 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 15:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 16:52 ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-13 17:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 18:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 21:33 ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 22:56 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 23:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 7:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-12 1:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13 5:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 9:55 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13 6:13 ` [PATCH] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 14:59 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-14 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 7:40 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix node_possible_map logic tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: fix system without memory on node0 -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 7:40 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: fix system without memory on node0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:54 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 17:25 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 5:16 ` [RESEND PATCH] " Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 16:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 17:26 ` [PATCH] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19 6:42 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19 8:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19 8:43 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19 16:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20 23:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-22 4:39 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-22 15:38 ` [PATCH] x86: only clear node_states for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2009-06-26 20:54 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 21:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-27 17:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27 20:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-29 7:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 7:39 ` [tip:x86/mm] mm, x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <20090511095022.GA23121@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20090511163158.c4e4d334.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20090512090704.GC18004@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4A0A6700.3070100@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20090513133635.GB7384@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4A0AFA6E.5050200@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20090515173521.GA29647@elte.hu>
2009-05-15 21:38 ` tip: patches in git for irq and numa Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 13:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 13:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 15:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 17:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 12:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 9:39 ` [tip:irq/numa] x86, io-apic: Don't mark pin_programmed early tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19 12:30 ` tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0527CB.4020807@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome