mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:43:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0B06D4.5090507@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513165210.GA1739@sgi.com>

Jack Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:34:31PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Jack found that crash with doesn't have memory on node0.
>>
>> it turns out with per_cpu changeset, node_number for BSP will be alway 0,
>> and it is consistent to cpu_to_node() that is to near node already.
>> aka when numa_set_node() for node0 is called early before per_cpu area is
>> setup
>>
>> try to set the node_number for boot cpu, after we get per_cpu area setup.
>>
>> [ Impact: fix crashing on memoryless node 0]
>>
>> Reported-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c |    8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
>> @@ -423,6 +423,14 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
>>  	early_per_cpu_ptr(x86_cpu_to_node_map) = NULL;
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
>> +	/*
>> +	 * make sure boot cpu node_number is right, when boot cpu is on the
>> +	 * node that doesn't have mem installed
>> +	 */
>> +	per_cpu(node_number, boot_cpu_id) = cpu_to_node(boot_cpu_id);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  	/* Setup node to cpumask map */
>>  	setup_node_to_cpumask_map();
>>  
> 
> With the patch above PLUS the patch below, I verified that all of our strange
> configurations boot to shell prompt & run simple commands. There are certainly
> some corner cases that have not been tested.
> 
> Note that both patches are required. The system panics in early boot if either
> patch is omitted.
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> Ignore offline nodes when building the zone lists. This
> fix is needed to support configurations that hax PXMs with
> cpus but no memory.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
> 
> 
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux/mm/page_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c	2009-05-12 17:06:59.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c	2009-05-13 09:54:09.000000000 -0500
> @@ -2370,6 +2370,8 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *p
>  		 * If another node is sufficiently far away then it is better
>  		 * to reclaim pages in a zone before going off node.
>  		 */
> +		if (!node_online(node))
> +			continue;
>  		if (distance > RECLAIM_DISTANCE)
>  			zone_reclaim_mode = 1;
>  

that means that node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] is still not right.

and it should be done by
/*
 * early_calculate_totalpages()
 * Sum pages in active regions for movable zone.
 * Populate N_HIGH_MEMORY for calculating usable_nodes.
 */
static unsigned long __init early_calculate_totalpages(void)
{
        int i;
        unsigned long totalpages = 0;

        for (i = 0; i < nr_nodemap_entries; i++) {
                unsigned long pages = early_node_map[i].end_pfn -
                                                early_node_map[i].start_pfn;
                totalpages += pages;
                if (pages)
                        node_set_state(early_node_map[i].nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY);
        }
        return totalpages;
}
     

also

void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
...



somehow that is broken?

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-13 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-09  6:45 [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  6:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  7:05   ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-05-12  1:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-11 21:53     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 20:59       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 17:16         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:21           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-13  5:39             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:34               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:58                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  6:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 17:53   ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 19:15     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:36       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:27     ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 21:26         ` Alan Cox
2009-05-11 22:25         ` David Rientjes
2009-05-12 15:06           ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 15:10             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 16:16               ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 16:40                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 18:03                   ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 21:31                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:58                       ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 23:13                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 23:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 15:43             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13  1:34             ` [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13  8:00               ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 15:58                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 13:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 16:52               ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-13 17:43                 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-05-13 18:08                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12  7:15         ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 21:33       ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 22:56         ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 23:00           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12  7:09       ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-12  1:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13  5:29   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13  6:13   ` [PATCH] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 14:59     ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-14 16:38       ` [PATCH 1/5] " Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:40         ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:41         ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:40           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix node_possible_map logic tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:42         ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: fix system without memory on node0 -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:40           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: fix system without memory on node0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:43         ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:54           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:05             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 17:25               ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:34                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:44                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04  5:16                   ` [RESEND PATCH] " Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 16:38                     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 16:48                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 17:11                         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 17:26                           ` [PATCH] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  6:42                             ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19  8:18                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  8:43                                 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19 16:16                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20 23:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-22  4:39                                     ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-22 15:38                                       ` [PATCH] x86: only clear node_states for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2009-06-26 20:54                                         ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 21:09                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-27 17:17                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27 20:40                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-29  7:39                                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:39         ` [tip:x86/mm] mm, x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
     [not found] ` <20090511095022.GA23121@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <20090511163158.c4e4d334.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]     ` <20090512090704.GC18004@elte.hu>
     [not found]       ` <4A0A6700.3070100@kernel.org>
     [not found]         ` <20090513133635.GB7384@elte.hu>
     [not found]           ` <4A0AFA6E.5050200@kernel.org>
     [not found]             ` <20090515173521.GA29647@elte.hu>
2009-05-15 21:38               ` tip: patches in git for irq and numa Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:29                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 13:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 13:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:03                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 15:09                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:11                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 17:23                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19  9:37                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 10:31                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 12:26                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19  9:39                           ` [tip:irq/numa] x86, io-apic: Don't mark pin_programmed early tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19 12:30                           ` tip-bot for Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A0B06D4.5090507@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome