mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, mel@csn.ul.ie, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, steiner@sgi.com,
	rientjes@google.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v4
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:18:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3B49BA.40100@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bpokiv0u.fsf@pobox.com>

Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:
>> SRAT tables may contains nodes of very small size. The arch code may
>> decide to not activate such a node. However, currently the early boot code
>> sets N_HIGH_MEMORY for such nodes. These nodes therefore seem to be active
>> although these nodes have no present pages.
>>
>> for 64bit N_HIGH_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY, so that works for 64 bit too
>>
>> v4: update description according to Christoph
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai@kernel.org>
>> Tested-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
>> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
>>
>> ---
>>  mm/page_alloc.c |    5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -4041,6 +4041,11 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigne
>>  						early_node_map[i].start_pfn,
>>  						early_node_map[i].end_pfn);
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes/early_calculate_totalpages init
>> +	 * that node_mask, clear it at first
>> +	 */
>> +	nodes_clear(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
>>  	/* Initialise every node */
>>  	mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
>>  	setup_nr_node_ids();
> 
> This patch breaks the cpuset.mems cgroup attribute on an i386 kvm guest.
> 
> With v2.6.30:
> 
> # uname -r
> 2.6.30
> # cat /cgroup/cpuset.mems
> 0
> # mkdir /cgroup/test
> # for i in cpus mems ; do cat /cgroup/cpuset.$i > /cgroup/test/cpuset.$i ; done
> # echo $$ > /cgroup/test/tasks
> # echo $?
> 0
> 
> With a pulled-today Linus tree:
> 
> # uname -r
> 2.6.30-06725-g1d89b30
> # cat /cgroup/cpuset.mems
> 
> # mkdir /cgroup/test
> # for i in cpus mems ; do cat /cgroup/cpuset.$i > /cgroup/test/cpuset.$i ; done
> # echo $$ > /cgroup/test/tasks
> -bash: echo: write error: No space left on device
> 
> (Note that in addition to the ENOSPC error, /cgroup/cpuset.mems is empty
> rather than '0' in the second test.)
> 
> I bisected to the commit containing this change.  Reverting fixes the
> problem.
> 

can you use following patch to see what happens to that nodemask?

YH

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index a5f3c27..eb89e8b 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4189,6 +4189,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
 {
 	unsigned long nid;
 	int i;
+	char buf[512];
 
 	/* Sort early_node_map as initialisation assumes it is sorted */
 	sort_node_map();
@@ -4244,6 +4245,9 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
 	 * find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes/early_calculate_totalpages init
 	 * that node_mask, clear it at first
 	 */
+	memset(buf, 0, 512);
+	nodemask_scnprintf(buf, 512, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "before clear: node_states [%d]: %s\n", N_HIGH_MEMORY, buf);
 	nodes_clear(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
 	/* Initialise every node */
 	mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
@@ -4258,6 +4262,9 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
 			node_set_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY);
 		check_for_regular_memory(pgdat);
 	}
+	memset(buf, 0, 512);
+	nodemask_scnprintf(buf, 512, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "after online check: node_states [%d]: %s\n", N_HIGH_MEMORY, buf);
 }
 
 static int __init cmdline_parse_core(char *p, unsigned long *core)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-19  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-09  6:45 [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  6:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  7:05   ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-05-12  1:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-11 21:53     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 20:59       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 17:16         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:21           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-13  5:39             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:34               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:58                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  6:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 17:53   ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 19:15     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:36       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:27     ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 21:26         ` Alan Cox
2009-05-11 22:25         ` David Rientjes
2009-05-12 15:06           ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 15:10             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 16:16               ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 16:40                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 18:03                   ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 21:31                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:58                       ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 23:13                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 23:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 15:43             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13  1:34             ` [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13  8:00               ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 15:58                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 13:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 16:52               ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-13 17:43                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 18:08                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12  7:15         ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 21:33       ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 22:56         ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 23:00           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12  7:09       ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-12  1:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13  5:29   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13  6:13   ` [PATCH] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 14:59     ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-14 16:38       ` [PATCH 1/5] " Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:40         ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:41         ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:40           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix node_possible_map logic tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:42         ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: fix system without memory on node0 -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:40           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: fix system without memory on node0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:43         ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:54           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:05             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 17:25               ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:34                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:44                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04  5:16                   ` [RESEND PATCH] " Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 16:38                     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 16:48                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 17:11                         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 17:26                           ` [PATCH] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  6:42                             ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19  8:18                               ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-06-19  8:43                                 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19 16:16                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20 23:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-22  4:39                                     ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-22 15:38                                       ` [PATCH] x86: only clear node_states for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2009-06-26 20:54                                         ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 21:09                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-27 17:17                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27 20:40                                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-29  7:39                                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:39         ` [tip:x86/mm] mm, x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
     [not found] ` <20090511095022.GA23121@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <20090511163158.c4e4d334.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]     ` <20090512090704.GC18004@elte.hu>
     [not found]       ` <4A0A6700.3070100@kernel.org>
     [not found]         ` <20090513133635.GB7384@elte.hu>
     [not found]           ` <4A0AFA6E.5050200@kernel.org>
     [not found]             ` <20090515173521.GA29647@elte.hu>
2009-05-15 21:38               ` tip: patches in git for irq and numa Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:29                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 13:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 13:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:03                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 15:09                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:11                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 17:23                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19  9:37                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 10:31                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 12:26                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19  9:39                           ` [tip:irq/numa] x86, io-apic: Don't mark pin_programmed early tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19 12:30                           ` tip-bot for Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A3B49BA.40100@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome