mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	cl@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
	ntl@pobox.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, steiner@sgi.com, rientjes@google.com,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: only clear node_states for 64bit
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:40:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4683B2.106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090627171714.GD21595@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:38:50 -0700
>>> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nathan reported that
>>>> | commit 73d60b7f747176dbdff826c4127d22e1fd3f9f74
>>>> | Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>>> | Date:   Tue Jun 16 15:33:00 2009 -0700
>>>> |
>>>> |    page-allocator: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before we set it again
>>>> |    
>>>> |    SRAT tables may contains nodes of very small size.  The arch code may
>>>> |    decide to not activate such a node.  However, currently the early boot
>>>> |    code sets N_HIGH_MEMORY for such nodes.  These nodes therefore seem to be
>>>> |    active although these nodes have no present pages.
>>>> |    
>>>> |    For 64bit N_HIGH_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY, so that works for 64 bit too
>>>>
>>>> the cpuset.mems cgroup attribute on an i386 kvm guest
>>>>
>>>> fix it by only clearing node_states[N_NORMAL_MEMORY] for 64bit only.
>>>> and need to do save/restore for that in find_zone_movable_pfn
>>>>
>>> There appear to be some words omitted from this changelog - it doesn't
>>> make sense.
>>>
>>> I think that perhaps a line got deleted before "the cpuset.mems cgroup
>>> ...".  That was the line which actualy describes the bug which we're
>>> fixing.  Or perhaps it was a single word?  "zeroes".
>>>
>>>
>>> I did this:
>>>
>>> Nathan reported that
>>> : 
>>> : | commit 73d60b7f747176dbdff826c4127d22e1fd3f9f74
>>> : | Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>> : | Date:   Tue Jun 16 15:33:00 2009 -0700
>>> : |
>>> : |    page-allocator: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before we set it again
>>> : |
>>> : |    SRAT tables may contains nodes of very small size.  The arch code may
>>> : |    decide to not activate such a node.  However, currently the early boot
>>> : |    code sets N_HIGH_MEMORY for such nodes.  These nodes therefore seem to be
>>> : |    active although these nodes have no present pages.
>>> : |
>>> : |    For 64bit N_HIGH_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY, so that works for 64 bit too
>>> : 
>> "
>>> : unintentionally and incorrectly clears the cpuset.mems cgroup attribute on
>>> : an i386 kvm guest
>> "
>> ==> 
>>
>> 32bit assume NORMAL_MEMORY bit and HIGH_MEMORY bit are set for 
>> Node0 always.
> 
> Where in the code is this assumption?

in mm/page_alloc.c
/*
 * Array of node states.
 */
nodemask_t node_states[NR_NODE_STATES] __read_mostly = {
        [N_POSSIBLE] = NODE_MASK_ALL,
        [N_ONLINE] = { { [0] = 1UL } },
#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
        [N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } },
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
        [N_HIGH_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } },
#endif
        [N_CPU] = { { [0] = 1UL } },
#endif  /* NUMA */
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_states);

for x86 64bit, we clear POSSIBLE and ONLINE in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c::initmem_init
and this patch clear NORMAL in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c::paging_init

for x86 32bit: ONLINE get cleared in get_memcfg_from_srat()
and NORMAL and HIGH_MEMORY are not cleared
before try to set new in mm/page_alloc.c::free_area_init_nodes

> 
>> and some code only check if HIGH_MEMORY is there to know if 
>> NORMAL_MEMORY is there.
> 
> Which code is that exactly?
> 
with grep:
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:	nodes_clear(node_states[N_NORMAL_MEMORY]);
drivers/base/node.c:	return print_nodes_state(N_NORMAL_MEMORY, buf);
include/linux/nodemask.h:	N_NORMAL_MEMORY,	/* The node has regular memory */
include/linux/nodemask.h:	N_HIGH_MEMORY = N_NORMAL_MEMORY,
mm/memcontrol.c:	if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY))
mm/page_alloc.c:	[N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } },
mm/page_alloc.c:			node_set_state(zone_to_nid(zone), N_NORMAL_MEMORY);
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:		for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:		for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
mm/slub.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)

Documentation/cgroups/cpusets.txt:automatically tracks the value of node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]--i.e.,
Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt:status_change_nid is set node id when N_HIGH_MEMORY of nodemask is (will be)
arch/ia64/kernel/uncached.c:		if (!node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
drivers/base/node.c:	return print_nodes_state(N_HIGH_MEMORY, buf);
include/linux/cpuset.h:#define cpuset_current_mems_allowed (node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY])
include/linux/nodemask.h:	N_HIGH_MEMORY,		/* The node has regular or high memory */
include/linux/nodemask.h:	N_HIGH_MEMORY = N_NORMAL_MEMORY,
kernel/cpuset.c: * found any online mems, return node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
kernel/cpuset.c: * of node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
kernel/cpuset.c:					node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
kernel/cpuset.c:					node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
kernel/cpuset.c:		*pmask = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
kernel/cpuset.c:	BUG_ON(!nodes_intersects(*pmask, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]));
kernel/cpuset.c:	 * top_cpuset.mems_allowed tracks node_stats[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
kernel/cpuset.c:				node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
kernel/cpuset.c:		    nodes_subset(cp->mems_allowed, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
kernel/cpuset.c:						node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
kernel/cpuset.c: * Keep top_cpuset.mems_allowed tracking node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
kernel/cpuset.c: * Call this routine anytime after node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] changes.
kernel/cpuset.c:		top_cpuset.mems_allowed = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
kernel/cpuset.c:	top_cpuset.mems_allowed = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
kernel/cpuset.c: * subset of node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], even if this means going outside the
mm/memcontrol.c:		for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
mm/memory_hotplug.c:		node_set_state(zone_to_nid(zone), N_HIGH_MEMORY);
mm/mempolicy.c:	if (!nodes_subset(new, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY])) {
mm/mempolicy.c:	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
mm/mempolicy.c:		if (!nodes_subset(nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
mm/mempolicy.c:			nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
mm/mempolicy.c:			&node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], MPOL_MF_STATS, md);
mm/mempolicy.c:	for_each_node_state(n, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
mm/migrate.c:			if (!node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
mm/oom_kill.c:	nodemask_t nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
mm/page-writeback.c:	for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
mm/page_alloc.c:	[N_HIGH_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } },
mm/page_alloc.c: * tasks mems_allowed, or node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].)
mm/page_alloc.c:					&node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
mm/page_alloc.c:	for_each_node_state(n, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
mm/page_alloc.c:				(nodes_weight(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) + 1);
mm/page_alloc.c: * Populate N_HIGH_MEMORY for calculating usable_nodes.
mm/page_alloc.c:			node_set_state(early_node_map[i].nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY);
mm/page_alloc.c:	nodemask_t saved_node_state = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
mm/page_alloc.c:	int usable_nodes = nodes_weight(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
mm/page_alloc.c:	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
mm/page_alloc.c:	node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] = saved_node_state;
mm/page_alloc.c:			node_set_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY);
mm/vmalloc.c:		for_each_node_state(nr, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
mm/vmscan.c:		for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
mm/vmscan.c:	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
mm/vmstat.c:	if (!node_state(pgdat->node_id, N_HIGH_MEMORY))

for 64bit N_HIGH_MEMORY == NORMAL_MEMORY

for 32bit, there are more reference to N_HIGH_MEMORY...

YH


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-27 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-09  6:45 [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  6:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  7:05   ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-05-12  1:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-11 21:53     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 20:59       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 17:16         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:21           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-13  5:39             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:34               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:58                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-09  6:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 17:53   ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 19:15     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:36       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-11 19:27     ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 21:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 21:26         ` Alan Cox
2009-05-11 22:25         ` David Rientjes
2009-05-12 15:06           ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 15:10             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 16:16               ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 16:40                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 18:03                   ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 21:31                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 21:58                       ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-12 23:13                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 23:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12 15:43             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13  1:34             ` [PATCH] x86: fix system without memory on node0 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13  8:00               ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-13 15:58                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 13:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-13 16:52               ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-13 17:43                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 18:08                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12  7:15         ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 21:33       ` Jack Steiner
2009-05-11 22:56         ` David Rientjes
2009-05-11 23:00           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-12  7:09       ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-12  1:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code Christoph Lameter
2009-05-12 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13  5:29   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-13  6:13   ` [PATCH] x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-13 14:59     ` Mel Gorman
2009-05-14 16:38       ` [PATCH 1/5] " Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:40         ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: add numa_move_cpus_to_node Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:41         ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: fix node_possible_map logic -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:40           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix node_possible_map logic tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:42         ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: fix system without memory on node0 -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:40           ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: fix system without memory on node0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:43         ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 16:54           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:05             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 17:25               ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-14 17:34                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-14 19:44                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04  5:16                   ` [RESEND PATCH] " Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 16:38                     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 16:48                       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-04 17:11                         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-04 17:26                           ` [PATCH] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  6:42                             ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19  8:18                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19  8:43                                 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-19 16:16                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20 23:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-22  4:39                                     ` Nathan Lynch
2009-06-22 15:38                                       ` [PATCH] x86: only clear node_states for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2009-06-26 20:54                                         ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 21:09                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-27 17:17                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-27 20:40                                               ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-06-29  7:39                                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:39         ` [tip:x86/mm] mm, x86: remove MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE related code tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
     [not found] ` <20090511095022.GA23121@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <20090511163158.c4e4d334.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]     ` <20090512090704.GC18004@elte.hu>
     [not found]       ` <4A0A6700.3070100@kernel.org>
     [not found]         ` <20090513133635.GB7384@elte.hu>
     [not found]           ` <4A0AFA6E.5050200@kernel.org>
     [not found]             ` <20090515173521.GA29647@elte.hu>
2009-05-15 21:38               ` tip: patches in git for irq and numa Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18  7:29                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 13:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 13:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:03                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-18 15:09                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 15:11                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 17:23                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19  9:37                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 10:31                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 12:26                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19  9:39                           ` [tip:irq/numa] x86, io-apic: Don't mark pin_programmed early tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2009-05-19 12:30                           ` tip-bot for Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A4683B2.106@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome