From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: rob@landley.net, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andre.przywara@amd.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pjt@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:38:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C6BFB9.7030405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355127754-8444-3-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
Hi Alex,
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> There is 4 situations in the function:
> 1, no task allowed group;
> so min_load = ULONG_MAX, this_load = 0, idlest = NULL
> 2, only local group task allowed;
> so min_load = ULONG_MAX, this_load assigned, idlest = NULL
> 3, only non-local task group allowed;
> so min_load assigned, this_load = 0, idlest != NULL
> 4, local group + another group are task allowed.
> so min_load assigned, this_load assigned, idlest != NULL
>
> Current logical will return NULL in first 3 kinds of scenarios.
> And still return NULL, if idlest group is heavier then the
> local group in the 4th situation.
>
> Actually, I thought groups in situation 2,3 are also eligible to host
> the task. And in 4th situation, agree to bias toward local group.
> So, has this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index df99456..b40bc2b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2953,6 +2953,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
> int this_cpu, int load_idx)
> {
> struct sched_group *idlest = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
> + struct sched_group *this_group = NULL;
> unsigned long min_load = ULONG_MAX, this_load = 0;
> int imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct-100)/2;
>
> @@ -2987,14 +2988,19 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
>
> if (local_group) {
> this_load = avg_load;
> - } else if (avg_load < min_load) {
> + this_group = group;
> + }
> + if (avg_load < min_load) {
> min_load = avg_load;
> idlest = group;
> }
> } while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
>
> - if (!idlest || 100*this_load < imbalance*min_load)
> - return NULL;
> + if (this_group && idlest != this_group)
> + /* Bias toward our group again */
> + if (100*this_load < imbalance*min_load)
> + idlest = this_group;
If the idlest group is heavier than this_group(or to put it better if
the difference in the loads of the local group and idlest group is less
than a threshold,it means there is no point moving the load from the
local group) you return NULL,that immediately means this_group is chosen
as the candidate group for the task to run,one does not have to
explicitly return that.
Let me explain:
find_idlest_group()-if it returns NULL to mark your case4,it means there
is no idler group than the group to which this_cpu belongs to, at that
level of sched domain.Which is fair enough.
So now the question is under such a circumstance which is the idlest
group so far.It is the group containing this_cpu,i.e.this_group.After
this sd->child is chosen which is nothing but this_group(sd hierarchy
moves towards the cpu it belongs to). Again here the idlest group search
begins.
> +
> return idlest;
> }
>
>
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-11 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-10 8:22 [PATCH 0/18] sched: simplified fork, enable load average into LB and power awareness scheduling Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up Alex Shi
2012-12-11 4:23 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 5:28 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-11 6:30 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 11:53 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 5:26 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-21 4:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 12:17 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical Alex Shi
2012-12-11 5:08 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2012-12-11 5:29 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-11 5:50 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 11:55 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 05/18] sched: load tracking bug fix Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 06/18] sched: set initial load avg of new forked task as its load weight Alex Shi
2012-12-21 4:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 12:00 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2012-12-12 3:57 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-12 5:52 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-13 8:45 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-21 4:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 11:42 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks Alex Shi
2012-12-12 4:41 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-12 6:26 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-21 4:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 12:29 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 09/18] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] sched: add sched_policy in kernel Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] sched: add power/performance balance allowed flag Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] sched: don't care if the local group has capacity Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] sched: pull all tasks from source group Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] sched: power aware load balance, Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] sched: lazy powersaving balance Alex Shi
2012-12-11 0:51 ` [PATCH 0/18] sched: simplified fork, enable load average into LB and power awareness scheduling Alex Shi
2012-12-11 12:10 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-11 15:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-11 16:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-12-11 16:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-11 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-12-12 9:52 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-12-12 13:55 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 14:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-12-13 2:51 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-13 3:07 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-13 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-14 1:56 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 1:14 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C6BFB9.7030405@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome