From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: rob@landley.net, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andre.przywara@amd.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pjt@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] sched: set initial load avg of new forked task as its load weight
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:33:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9t8f2ic.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355127754-8444-7-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> (Alex Shi's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:22:22 +0800")
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:22:22 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> New task has no runnable sum at its first runnable time, that make
> burst forking just select few idle cpus to put tasks.
> Set initial load avg of new forked task as its load weight to resolve
> this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5dafac3..093f9cd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ struct sched_domain;
> #else
> #define ENQUEUE_WAKING 0
> #endif
> +#define ENQUEUE_NEWTASK 8
>
> #define DEQUEUE_SLEEP 1
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index e6533e1..96fa5f1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1648,7 +1648,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p)
> #endif
>
> rq = __task_rq_lock(p);
> - activate_task(rq, p, 0);
> + activate_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NEWTASK);
> p->on_rq = 1;
> trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, true);
> check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 1faf89f..61c8d24 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1277,8 +1277,9 @@ static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
> /* Add the load generated by se into cfs_rq's child load-average */
> static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> struct sched_entity *se,
> - int wakeup)
> + int flags)
> {
> + int wakeup = flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
> /*
> * We track migrations using entity decay_count <= 0, on a wake-up
> * migration we use a negative decay count to track the remote decays
> @@ -1312,6 +1313,12 @@ static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> update_entity_load_avg(se, 0);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * set the initial load avg of new task same as its load
> + * in order to avoid brust fork make few cpu too heavier
> + */
> + if (flags & ENQUEUE_NEWTASK)
> + se->avg.load_avg_contrib = se->load.weight;
> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> /* we force update consideration on load-balancer moves */
> update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, !wakeup);
> @@ -1476,7 +1483,8 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> */
> update_curr(cfs_rq);
> account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
> - enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> + enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags &
> + (ENQUEUE_WAKEUP | ENQUEUE_NEWTASK));
It seems that just passing 'flags' is enough.
>
> if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) {
> place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
> @@ -2586,6 +2594,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
>
> flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
> + flags &= ~ENQUEUE_NEWTASK;
Why is this needed?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> }
>
> for_each_sched_entity(se) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-10 8:22 [PATCH 0/18] sched: simplified fork, enable load average into LB and power awareness scheduling Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 01/18] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up Alex Shi
2012-12-11 4:23 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 5:28 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-11 6:30 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 11:53 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 5:26 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-21 4:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 12:17 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 02/18] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical Alex Shi
2012-12-11 5:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 5:29 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-11 5:50 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-11 11:55 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 03/18] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 04/18] sched: remove domain iterations in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 05/18] sched: load tracking bug fix Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 06/18] sched: set initial load avg of new forked task as its load weight Alex Shi
2012-12-21 4:33 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-12-23 12:00 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 07/18] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2012-12-12 3:57 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-12 5:52 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-13 8:45 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-21 4:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 11:42 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 08/18] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks Alex Shi
2012-12-12 4:41 ` Preeti U Murthy
2012-12-12 6:26 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-21 4:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-12-23 12:29 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 09/18] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 10/18] sched: add sched_policy in kernel Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 12/18] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 13/18] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 14/18] sched: add power/performance balance allowed flag Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 15/18] sched: don't care if the local group has capacity Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 16/18] sched: pull all tasks from source group Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 17/18] sched: power aware load balance, Alex Shi
2012-12-10 8:22 ` [PATCH 18/18] sched: lazy powersaving balance Alex Shi
2012-12-11 0:51 ` [PATCH 0/18] sched: simplified fork, enable load average into LB and power awareness scheduling Alex Shi
2012-12-11 12:10 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-11 15:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-11 16:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-12-11 16:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-11 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-12-12 9:52 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-12-12 13:55 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 14:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-12-13 2:51 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-13 3:07 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-13 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-12-14 1:56 ` Alex Shi
2012-12-12 1:14 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a9t8f2ic.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome