From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>, Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched: decouple PREFERRED_CPU from PARAVIRT in Kconfig.preempt
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 18:30:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66ccd713-5571-4c1a-b59e-29adbc9852e3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9273846b-d815-4c40-a7a0-960281515878@linux.ibm.com>
Hi.
On 11/2/26 5:04 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>
>
> On 11/2/26 12:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 11:16:30AM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/1/26 20:21, Yury Norov wrote:
>>>> The IBM s390 doesn't enable PARAVIRT config for their hardware
>>>> virtualized Logical Partitions (LPAR). However, the steal time is
>>>> accounted for the LPARs, once the config VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
>>>> is enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Preferred cpumask doesn't rely on any feature gated by PARAVIRT config,
>>>> and requires it to minimize the configuration space and runtime overhead,
>>>> with the lack of non-paravirt user. Now that s390 wants to adopt preferred
>>>> cpumask, there's no reason to keep it coupled to paravirt.
>>>>
>>>> Make PREFERRED_CPU a user-configurable option, even if paravirtualization
>>>> is not enabled, and drop PARAVIRT dependency on the steal governor.
>>>>
>>>> Keep the default module selection conditional on PARAVIRT so other SMP
>>>> configurations can opt in without enabling the governor by default.
>>>>
>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4605dad5-aab2-49e3-b919-bf9897181834@linux.ibm.com/
>>>> CC: Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Can be applied independently from the rest of the series.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/virt/Kconfig | 8 ++++++--
>>>> kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> This is really useful to us, since even though s390 is nominally
>>> paravirtualized, it does not technically benefit from defining
>>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
>>
>> And therefore removing PARAVIRT is the only possible solution?
>>
>>> Specifically, steal time accounting happens by
>>> computing a difference between wall time and CPU time, and not by
>>> explicitly querying the hypervisor.
>>
>> Nobody explicitly asks the hypervisor, that would be horrendously slow.
>>
>> Something trivial like this should do.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/virt/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
>> index 1163736de1f9..8980054beb52 100644
>> --- a/arch/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
>> @@ -1080,6 +1080,15 @@ config HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
>> config HAVE_PV_STEAL_CLOCK_GEN
>> bool
>> +#
>> +# Archs that can account CPUTIME_STEAL; normal route is through PARAVIRT which
>> +# selects HAVE_PV_STEAL_CLOCK_GEN. Directly selected by s390 and PPC-LPAR
>> +# which have their own thing and don't go through generic cputime accounting.
>> +#
>> +config HAVE_CPUTIME_STEAL
>> + bool
>> + default y if HAVE_PV_STEAL_CLOCK_GEN
>> +
Can't PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING be the kconfig we can rely upon.
s390 can add it to the config (similar to HAVE_CPUTIME_STEAL)?
I guess it is selected currently where the steal time reporting happens.
>> config HAVE_MOVE_PUD
>> bool
>> help
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
>> index 7d125e288f6e..3c49baf606d7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ config PPC_SPLPAR
>> depends on PPC_PSERIES
>> select PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS if PPC_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
>> select PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>> + select HAVE_CPUTIME_STEAL
>> default y
>> help
>> Enabling this option will make the kernel run more efficiently
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> index 7138d923d86f..03a884355218 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ config S390
>> select USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
>> select VDSO_GETRANDOM
>> select VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
>> + select HAVE_CPUTIME_STEAL
>> select VMAP_STACK
>> select ZONE_DMA
>> # Note: keep the above list sorted alphabetically
>> diff --git a/drivers/virt/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/Kconfig
>> index eeb84e578ddf..a3721d34a55c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virt/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/virt/Kconfig
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ config FSL_HV_MANAGER
>> config STEAL_GOVERNOR
>> tristate "Dynamic vCPU management based on steal time"
>> - depends on PARAVIRT && SMP
>> + depends on SMP && HAVE_CPUTIME_STEAL
>> select PREFERRED_CPU
>> default m
>> help
>
> I can't comment on the PPC part, but for s390 this works fine with the
> following addition:
>
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> @@ -197,4 +197,4 @@ config SCHED_CLASS_EXT
>
> config PREFERRED_CPU
> bool
> - depends on SMP && PARAVIRT
> + depends on SMP && HAVE_CPUTIME_STEAL
PS: I haven't read the series yet.
Will try to do so when it get little bit of time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 19:21 [PATCH 0/6] sched: Expose writable interface for preferred CPUs mask Yury Norov
2026-11-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: decouple PREFERRED_CPU from PARAVIRT in Kconfig.preempt Yury Norov
2026-11-02 10:16 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-11-02 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-02 11:34 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-11-02 13:00 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-11-02 13:41 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2026-11-02 14:57 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-11-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] cpumask: Add reset_preferred_cpumask() helper Yury Norov
2026-11-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Restore preferred CPUs when hotplug removes the last one Yury Norov
2026-11-01 19:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: serialize preferred cpumask update better Yury Norov
2026-11-01 19:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] virt: steal_governor: Warn on unexpected preferred mask states Yury Norov
2026-11-01 19:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpu: Add per-CPU preferred sysfs control Yury Norov
2026-11-02 8:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] sched: Expose writable interface for preferred CPUs mask Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66ccd713-5571-4c1a-b59e-29adbc9852e3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=ynorov@nvidia.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®