* [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: set rq->idle_stamp at the end of the sched_balance_newidle
2025-11-27 5:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: update the rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU Huang Shijie
@ 2025-11-27 5:03 ` Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: update the rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the delay-dequeue task Huang Shijie
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Huang Shijie @ 2025-11-27 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot
Cc: patches, cl, Shubhang, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, linux-kernel, vschneid, vineethr, Huang Shijie
Save the idle_stamp at the beginning of sched_balance_newidle(),
if it cannot pull any task, set it for rq->idle_stamp.
This patch does not change the logic of rq->idle_stamp.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 769d7b7990df..c1a8fa043156 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12862,6 +12862,7 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
u64 t0, t1, curr_cost = 0;
struct sched_domain *sd;
int pulled_task = 0;
+ u64 idle_stamp;
update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
@@ -12877,7 +12878,9 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
* for CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, such that we measure the this duration
* as idle time.
*/
- this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
+ idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
+
+ this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
/*
* Do not pull tasks towards !active CPUs...
@@ -12989,10 +12992,11 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, next_balance))
this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
- if (pulled_task)
- this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
- else
+ if (!pulled_task) {
+ /* Set it here on purpose. */
+ this_rq->idle_stamp = idle_stamp;
nohz_newidle_balance(this_rq);
+ }
rq_repin_lock(this_rq, rf);
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: update the rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU
2025-11-27 5:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: update the rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: set rq->idle_stamp at the end of the sched_balance_newidle Huang Shijie
@ 2025-11-27 5:03 ` Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the delay-dequeue task Huang Shijie
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Huang Shijie @ 2025-11-27 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot
Cc: patches, cl, Shubhang, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, linux-kernel, vschneid, vineethr, Huang Shijie
In the newidle balance, the rq->idle_stamp may set to a non-zero value
if it cannot pull any task.
In the wakeup, it will detect the rq->idle_stamp, and updates
the rq->avg_idle, then ends the CPU idle status by setting rq->idle_stamp
to zero.
Besides the wakeup, current code does not end the CPU idle status
when a task is moved to the idle CPU, such as fork/clone, execve,
or other cases.
This patch introduces a helper: update_rq_avg_idle().
And uses it in activate_task(), so it will update the rq->avg_idle
when a task is moved to an idle CPU at:
-- wakeup
-- fork/clone
-- execve
-- idle balance
-- other cases
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0c4ff93eeb78..a946f3604548 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2135,6 +2135,7 @@ void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
sched_mm_cid_migrate_to(rq, p);
enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
+ update_rq_avg_idle(rq);
WRITE_ONCE(p->on_rq, TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED);
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(p->on_rq);
@@ -2412,6 +2413,21 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
return cpu_online(cpu);
}
+void update_rq_avg_idle(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ if (rq->idle_stamp) {
+ u64 delta = rq_clock(rq) - rq->idle_stamp;
+ u64 max = 2*rq->max_idle_balance_cost;
+
+ update_avg(&rq->avg_idle, delta);
+
+ if (rq->avg_idle > max)
+ rq->avg_idle = max;
+
+ rq->idle_stamp = 0;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* This is how migration works:
*
@@ -3645,18 +3661,6 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags,
p->sched_class->task_woken(rq, p);
rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
}
-
- if (rq->idle_stamp) {
- u64 delta = rq_clock(rq) - rq->idle_stamp;
- u64 max = 2*rq->max_idle_balance_cost;
-
- update_avg(&rq->avg_idle, delta);
-
- if (rq->avg_idle > max)
- rq->avg_idle = max;
-
- rq->idle_stamp = 0;
- }
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index b419a4d98461..0e8aef1cef96 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ static inline void update_avg(u64 *avg, u64 sample)
*avg += diff / 8;
}
+extern void update_rq_avg_idle(struct rq *);
+
/*
* Shifting a value by an exponent greater *or equal* to the size of said value
* is UB; cap at size-1.
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the delay-dequeue task
2025-11-27 5:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: update the rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: set rq->idle_stamp at the end of the sched_balance_newidle Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: update the rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU Huang Shijie
@ 2025-11-27 5:03 ` Huang Shijie
2025-11-27 5:51 ` K Prateek Nayak
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Huang Shijie @ 2025-11-27 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot
Cc: patches, cl, Shubhang, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, linux-kernel, vschneid, vineethr, Huang Shijie
When a delay-dequeue task is woken and requeued back, it may
becomes eligible, and changes the CPU idle status,
so we need to update the rq->avg_idle for it.
This patch adds a new parameter for requeue_delayed_entity(),
and updates the rq->avg_idle as needed.
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c1a8fa043156..2ac630ecdbd5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5208,7 +5208,7 @@ static void check_enqueue_throttle(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
static inline int cfs_rq_throttled(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
static void
-requeue_delayed_entity(struct sched_entity *se);
+requeue_delayed_entity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se);
static void
enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
@@ -6835,7 +6835,7 @@ static int sched_idle_cpu(int cpu)
}
static void
-requeue_delayed_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
+requeue_delayed_entity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
@@ -6862,6 +6862,10 @@ requeue_delayed_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
}
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0);
+
+ if (entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se))
+ update_rq_avg_idle(rq);
+
clear_delayed(se);
}
@@ -6894,7 +6898,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
util_est_enqueue(&rq->cfs, p);
if (flags & ENQUEUE_DELAYED) {
- requeue_delayed_entity(se);
+ requeue_delayed_entity(rq, se);
return;
}
@@ -6912,7 +6916,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
if (se->on_rq) {
if (se->sched_delayed)
- requeue_delayed_entity(se);
+ requeue_delayed_entity(rq, se);
break;
}
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the delay-dequeue task
2025-11-27 5:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the delay-dequeue task Huang Shijie
@ 2025-11-27 5:51 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-27 7:59 ` Shijie Huang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: K Prateek Nayak @ 2025-11-27 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huang Shijie, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot
Cc: patches, cl, Shubhang, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, linux-kernel, vschneid, vineethr
On 11/27/2025 10:33 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> When a delay-dequeue task is woken and requeued back, it may
> becomes eligible, and changes the CPU idle status,
> so we need to update the rq->avg_idle for it.
>
> This patch adds a new parameter for requeue_delayed_entity(),
> and updates the rq->avg_idle as needed.
Can't this be solved by moving update_rq_avg_idle() into
enqueue_task() in the previous patch? The only path that can
reenqueue a delayed task from ttwu_runnable() calls
enqueue_task() with ENQUEUE_DELAYED.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: update rq->avg_idle for the delay-dequeue task
2025-11-27 5:51 ` K Prateek Nayak
@ 2025-11-27 7:59 ` Shijie Huang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shijie Huang @ 2025-11-27 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: K Prateek Nayak, Huang Shijie, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli,
vincent.guittot
Cc: patches, cl, Shubhang, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall,
mgorman, linux-kernel, vschneid, vineethr
On 27/11/2025 13:51, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Can't this be solved by moving update_rq_avg_idle() into
> enqueue_task() in the previous patch? The only path that can
No problem, I can merge this patch into previous patch.
Thanks
Huang Shijie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread