From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
"Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeouts B and C
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:58:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-_Je7evunNi7kz0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z--m5rTDLLbyWEE5@earth.li>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:31:18AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 11:10:12AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 09:51:29AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:43:19PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 09:45:21PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 06:45:40PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > > > > > With some Infineon chips the timeouts in tpm_tis_send_data (both B and
> > > > > > > C) can reach up to about 2250 ms.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Extend the timeout duration to accommodate this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem here is the bump of timeout_c is going to interact poorly with
> > > > > > the Infineon errata workaround, as now we'll wait 4s instead of 200ms to
> > > > > > detect the stuck status change.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (Also shouldn't timeout_c already end up as 750ms, as it's
> > > > > > max(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT, TPM2_TIMEOUT_C), and TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT is 750 vs 200
> > > > > > for TPM2_TIMEOUT_C? That doesn't seem to be borne out by your logs, nor my
> > > > > > results.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Just noticed that the commit did not end up having fixes etc. tags:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git/commit/?id=de9e33df7762abbfc2a1568291f2c3a3154c6a9d
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we forward to stable?
> > > >
> > > > It's a TPM bug rather than a kernel issue, so I don't think there's a valid
> > > > Fixes: for it, but it's certainly stable material in my mind.
> > >
> > > In the more general sense of Fixes: indicating where the fix is
> > > applicable it would be any kernel that supports TPM2.
> >
> > I tried applying the patch on 6.1-stable:
> >
> > ~/work/kernel.org/stable/linux tags/v6.1.132
> > $ git am -3 ~/Downloads/infineon.patch
> > Applying: tpm, tpm_tis: Workaround failed command reception on Infineon devices
> > Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> > M drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > M drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> > M include/linux/tpm.h
> > Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> > Auto-merging include/linux/tpm.h
> > Auto-merging drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> > Auto-merging drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> >
> > If no counter-opinions, I'd add:
> >
> > stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.1+
> >
> > I based this on Bookworm kernel.
>
> It looks like Sasha has already autoselected it for 6.1, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 +
> 6.14.
Right! I can see also those mails, and exactly the version range I would
have proposed :-) Perfect, thanks Sasha!
>
> J.
>
> --
> How does it work? I don't know but it does!
> This .sig brought to you by the letter R and the number 21
> Product of the Republic of HuggieTag
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 17:21 Michal Suchanek
2025-04-02 17:45 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-02 20:07 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 9:31 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 11:00 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-03 11:56 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 13:00 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-03 14:11 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-03 18:25 ` [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeout B Michal Suchanek
2025-04-03 18:28 ` Paul Menzel
2025-04-04 8:23 ` [PATCH v3] tpm: tis: Double the timeout B to 4s Michal Suchanek
2025-04-04 8:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-05-14 12:10 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-05-15 1:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-05-15 11:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 18:49 ` [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeout B Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-04 7:53 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-04 8:12 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-04 8:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 18:45 ` [PATCH] tpm: tis: Increase the default for timeouts B and C Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-03 20:43 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-04 7:51 ` Michal Suchánek
2025-04-04 8:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-04-04 9:31 ` Jonathan McDowell
2025-04-04 11:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-04-03 18:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-_Je7evunNi7kz0@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=noodles@earth.li \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®