From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Kyle McMartin <jkkm@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/rt: Have RT_PUSH_IPI be default off for non PREEMPT_RT
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 08:09:04 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag34wA_f7OJbJTsb@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <310c1f04-562e-4e81-9d39-0f28e1cc414c@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:34:35PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> By any chance it is running with preempt=none/voluntary?
> If so it might never call schedule until it goes back to user space.
I think this might be it. In the production dump, the locked up cpus were
often running btrfs compression / decompression. The kernel is PREEMPT_NONE
and while that path has resched_curr()'s, with high enough irq frequency, it
wouldn't be that difficult to catch the cpu enough times before it reaches
the resched point.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 14:37 Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-15 18:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 18:47 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-15 18:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 22:27 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-18 8:47 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-05-20 6:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-20 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 17:04 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-20 18:09 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-05-20 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-21 10:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag34wA_f7OJbJTsb@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jkkm@meta.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®