From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Kyle McMartin <jkkm@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/rt: Have RT_PUSH_IPI be default off for non PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 12:27:12 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agedwG-ZQNCrBDdn@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515145608.2039b4cf@gandalf.local.home>
Hello,
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 02:56:08PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I just want to make sure that my analysis is correct. Since only one CPU
> can initiate the RT_PUSH_IPI. That for this to be a problem, other CPUs
> need to be constantly running RT tasks for short periods of time so that
> when the RT task schedules off the CPU, the CPU then initiates the "pull".
> And it's not that it happens all at once. It's more serialized where the RT
> tasks are scheduling off at different times to constantly feed the
> RT_PUSH_IPI logic without seeing that it's already in place.
>
> It would require this to happen enough times to keep the overloaded CPU
> from finishing the softirq until a time when the softirq is scheduled
> again. And it would maintain this abuse for long enough to trigger the
> watchdog.
>
> Does that fit the scenario of your environment?
Yeah, I think that's coming from the FIFO threaded irq handling for mpi3mr.
We tried two mitigations - one dropping the irq threads to SCHED_OTHER and
NO_RT_PUSH_IPI. Both worked. While the former is not conclusive in itself,
it is in line with the theory at least.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 14:37 Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-15 18:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 18:47 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-15 18:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 22:27 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-05-18 8:47 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-05-20 6:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-20 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 17:04 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-20 18:09 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-20 19:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-21 10:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-05-20 8:33 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agedwG-ZQNCrBDdn@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jkkm@meta.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®