From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: submitting-patches: Clarify half-baked review tags
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:44:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxQD7SNOOL3uZ49@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWA1LNNaih3DHUM7yxpoyrnUndWDKpOjqb6_hSWWs7KHw@mail.gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by even with the "# subpart" still appears in person's credits
> > > and reviewing entire patch of 700 lines of diff code (like Frank's SPI
> > > patch) is not the same as 10 diff codes for one driver.
> >
> > Yes, if you want to spoil that, you'd need to introduce
> >
> > Partly-reviewed-by: ...
> >
> > or something.
>
> With a parameter taking a percentage or number of files or lines,
> to serve as input for the Big Statistics Calculation?
I assume Krzysztof addresses people playing number games. While I do
understand this motivation to raise the bar, I also know people will
find ways to jump over the higher bar etc...
Quoting Joshua/WOPR: "A STRANGE GAME. THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO
PLAY"
Maybe we should stop publishing development statistics? ;)
Seriously, the main thing I am aiming at is to improve code maintenance.
And so, the "# subparts" are much more interesting to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:27 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 8:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 8:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 9:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 10:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 11:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 11:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 11:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 12:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 14:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 9:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-11-05 9:44 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-11-05 9:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 9:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 9:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 10:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:30 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-11-05 15:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 15:44 ` Juergen Gross
2026-11-05 15:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 15:59 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-11-05 16:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auxQD7SNOOL3uZ49@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®